Literature DB >> 28127260

Barriers to accessing urethroplasty.

Michael J Consolo1, Kirin K Syed2, Christopher Robison1, Jacob McFadden3, David I Shalowitz4, Gordon A Brown1, David O Sussman5, Bradley D Figler6.   

Abstract

Urethroplasty is an effective treatment for men with anterior urethral strictures, but is utilized less frequently than ineffective treatments such as internal urethrotomy. We sought to identify provider-level barriers to urethroplasty. An anonymous online survey was emailed to all Mid-Atlantic American Urological Association members. Six scenarios in which urethroplasty was the most appropriate treatment were presented. Primary outcome was recommendation for urethroplasty in ≥ three clinical scenarios. Other factors measured include practice zip code, urethroplasty training, and proximity to a urethroplasty surgeon. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with increased likelihood of urethroplasty recommendation. Of 670 members emailed, 109 (16%) completed the survey. Final analysis included 88 respondents. Mean years in practice was 17.2. Most respondents received formal training in urethroplasty: 43 (49%) in residency, 5 (6%) in fellowship, and 10 (11%) in both; 48 respondents (55%) had a urethroplasty surgeon in their practice, whereas 18 (20%) had a urethroplasty surgeon within 45 minutes of his or her primary practice location. The only covariate that was associated with an increased likelihood of recommending urethroplasty in ≥ three scenarios was formal urethroplasty training. Most members (68%) reported no barriers to referring patients for urethroplasty; the most common barriers cited were long distance to urethroplasty surgeon (n 5 13, 15%) and concern about complications (n 5 8, 9%). Urethroplasty continues to be underutilized in men with anterior urethral strictures, potentially due to lack of knowledge dissemination and access to a urethroplasty surgeon. Appropriate urethroplasty utilization may increase with greater exposure to urethroplasty in training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Physician practice patterns; Urethral stricture; Urethroplasty

Year:  2016        PMID: 28127260      PMCID: PMC5260948          DOI: 10.3909/riu0731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  13 in total

1.  Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Gerald H Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States.

Authors:  Travis L Bullock; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup.

Authors:  V Pansadoro; P Emiliozzi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Minimally invasive methods for bulbar urethral strictures: a survey of members of the American Urological Association.

Authors:  Genoa G Ferguson; Travis L Bullock; Ryan E Anderson; Ryan E Blalock; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Patterns of management of urethral stricture disease in the Veterans Affairs system.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Victoria C S Scott; Claudia Sevilla; Mingming Wang; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty?

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Jill C Buckley; Richard A Santucci; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Male urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Richard A Santucci; Geoffrey F Joyce; Matthew Wise
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison.

Authors:  J W Steenkamp; C F Heyns; M L de Kock
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Urethrotomy has a much lower success rate than previously reported.

Authors:  Richard Santucci; Lauren Eisenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  High regional variation in urethroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Bradley D Figler; John L Gore; Sarah K Holt; Bryan B Voelzke; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.

Authors:  Robert Pickard; Beatriz Goulao; Sonya Carnell; Jing Shen; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Matt Breckons; Luke Vale; Paul Whybrow; Tim Rapley; Rebecca Forbes; Stephanie Currer; Mark Forrest; Jennifer Wilkinson; Elaine McColl; Daniela Andrich; Stewart Barclay; Jonathan Cook; Anthony Mundy; James N'Dow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Socioeconomic and patient-related factors for the management of male urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Ryan A Dornbier; Eric J Kirshenbaum; Marc H Nelson; Robert H Blackwell; Gopal N Gupta; Ahmer V Farooq; Christopher M Gonzalez
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Effect of body mass index on recurrence following urethroplasty.

Authors:  David E Rapp; James T Mills; Luriel I Smith-Harrison; Ryan P Smith; Raymond A Costabile
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

4.  Diagnosis and treatment of anterior urethral strictures in China: an internet-based survey.

Authors:  Changhao Hou; Yubo Gu; Wei Yuan; Zeyu Wang; Jiahao Lin; Qiang Fu; Lujie Song
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.