Literature DB >> 28126951

Reply to "On the Impact Factor and the ASM Editorial Policy".

Ferric C Fang1, Arturo Casadevall2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID： 28126951      PMCID： PMC5278168          DOI： 10.1128/IAI.00989-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN： 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies.

Authors:  Douglas S Katz; Anthony V Proto; William W Olmsted
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Melissa J Shauver; Sunitha Malay; Lin Zhong; Aaron Weinstein; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Important science--it's all about the SPIN.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; R Smith; N Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Stefano Bertuzzi; Michael J Buchmeier; Roger J Davis; Harold Drake; Ferric C Fang; Jack Gilbert; Barbara M Goldman; Michael J Imperiale; Philip Matsumura; Alexander J McAdam; Marcela F Pasetti; Rozanne M Sandri-Goldin; Thomas Silhavy; Louis Rice; Jo-Anne H Young; Thomas Shenk
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Impacted science: impact is not importance.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 8.  Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.867
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?"

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 7.867
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.