Literature DB >> 2812655

The prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology for stage I endometrial cancer.

D A Turner1, D M Gershenson, N Atkinson, N Sneige, A T Wharton.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of 567 patients treated for surgical stage I endometrial cancer was undertaken to resolve the controversy over the significance of malignant peritoneal cytology findings in early-stage disease. Twenty-eight women (4.9%) had peritoneal cytology positive for malignant cells. Comparisons were made between the groups with positive and negative cytology. Subgroups used in analysis included stage according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, treatment regimen, histology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and cervical Papanicolaou smear results. Cervical smear status was the only subgroup in which a statistically significant difference was found, with the positive peritoneal cytology patients having a higher incidence of positive Papanicolaou smears (P = .01). Forty-nine women (8.6%) developed recurrent tumor, 7% of the negative-cytology group and 32% of the positive-cytology group (P = .0002). The progression-free survival rate was lowered significantly by positive peritoneal cytology (P less than .0001); patients with negative peritoneal cytology had a significantly better 5-year survival rate, 96 versus 84% (P = .0001). When multivariate analysis was performed on the 477 cases that had no missing values, peritoneal cytology remained significant for both survival rate (P = .01) and progression-free interval (P = .002). Positive peritoneal cytology is a poor prognostic factor for patients with surgical stage I endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2812655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  [Changes in the TNM classification of gynecological tumors].

Authors:  L-C Horn; M W Beckmann; A Beller; D Schmidt; U Ulrich; P Hantschmann; C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Feng Gao; Jason D Wright; Andrea R Hagemann; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  [Current TNM/FIGO classification for cervical and endometrial cancer as well as malignant mixed müllerian tumors. Facts and background].

Authors:  L-C Horn; K Schierle; D Schmidt; U Ulrich; A Liebmann; C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma confined to the uterus.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; T Onda; N Katsumata; M Sawada; T Yamada; R Tsunematsu; K Ohmi; Y Sasajima; Y Matsuno
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Impact of SurePath® liquid-based preparation in cytological analysis of peritoneal washing in practice of gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Ruchita Tyagi; Nalini Gupta; Priyanka Bhagat; Shalini Gainder; Bhavna Rai; L K Dhaliwal; Arvind Rajwanshi
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Diagnostic Cytopathology of Peritoneal Washings.

Authors:  Rosemary E Zuna
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Impact of positive cytology in uterine serous carcinoma: A reassessment.

Authors:  Logan Corey; Juliana Fucinari; Mohamed Elshaikh; Daniel Schultz; Rami Musallam; Feras Zaiem; Fayez Daaboul; Omar Fehmi; Greg Dyson; Julie Ruterbusch; Robert Morris; Michelle L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.