Literature DB >> 28126491

The relative reinforcing value of sweet versus savory snack foods after consumption of sugar- or non-nutritive sweetened beverages.

Shanon L Casperson1, LuAnn Johnson2, James N Roemmich2.   

Abstract

The effects of sugar-sweetened (SSB) and non-nutritive sweetened (NSB) beverages on the regulation of appetite, energy intake and body weight regulation remain controversial. Using a behavioral choice paradigm, we sought to determine the effects of consuming a SSB or NSB on appetite and the reinforcing value of sweet relative to salty/savory snack foods. In a randomized crossover study, 21 healthy weight adults consumed 360 ml of SSB (sucrose; 31 g) or NSB (sucralose; 4 g) with a standardized meal. Hedonic ratings for the sweet and salty/savory snack foods used for the reinforcement task were assessed prior to the start of the study. Satiety and the desire to eat foods with a specific taste profile were assessed before and every 30 min post-meal for 4 h. The relative reinforcing value of the snack foods was assessed using a computer-based choice task (operant responding with concurrent schedules of reinforcement) 4 h post-meal. Hedonic ratings did not differ between the most highly liked sweet and salty/savory snack foods. Beverage type did not influence measures of satiety or the desire to eat foods with a specific taste. However, sweet snacks were more (p < 0.05) reinforcing relative to salty/savory snack foods after consuming a NSB than after a SSB. In conclusion, this is the first study to demonstrate that NSB can increase the motivation to gain access to sweet snacks relative to salty/savory snack foods later in the day. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food reinforcement; Non-nutritive sweetened; Snack foods; Sugar-sweetened; “Diet” drinks

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28126491     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  7 in total

1.  Energy compensation in response to aerobic exercise training in overweight adults.

Authors:  Kyle D Flack; Kelsey Ufholz; LuAnn Johnson; John S Fitzgerald; James N Roemmich
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  The consequences of exercise-induced weight loss on food reinforcement. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kyle D Flack; Harry M Hays; Jack Moreland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Increasing the Reinforcing Value of Exercise in Overweight Adults.

Authors:  Kyle D Flack; Kelsey Ufholz; LuAnn Johnson; James N Roemmich
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 4.  Low-calorie sweeteners in the human diet: scientific evidence, recommendations, challenges and future needs. A symposium report from the FENS 2019 conference.

Authors:  Alison M Gallagher; Margaret Ashwell; Jason C G Halford; Charlotte A Hardman; Niamh G Maloney; Anne Raben
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Impact of Dietary Protein and Gender on Food Reinforcement.

Authors:  Shanon L Casperson; James N Roemmich
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape.

Authors:  Szimonetta Lohner; Ingrid Toews; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Alexandra G Yunker; Jasmin M Alves; Shan Luo; Brendan Angelo; Alexis DeFendis; Trevor A Pickering; John R Monterosso; Kathleen A Page
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.