Literature DB >> 28126409

Who Should Pick the Winners of Climate Change?

Michael S Webster1, Madhavi A Colton2, Emily S Darling3, Jonathan Armstrong4, Malin L Pinsky5, Nancy Knowlton6, Daniel E Schindler7.   

Abstract

Many conservation strategies identify a narrow subset of genotypes, species, or geographic locations that are predicted to be favored under different scenarios of future climate change. However, a focus on predicted winners, which might not prove to be correct, risks undervaluing the balance of biological diversity from which climate-change winners could otherwise emerge. Drawing on ecology, evolutionary biology, and portfolio theory, we propose a conservation approach designed to promote adaptation that is less dependent on uncertain predictions about the identity of winners and losers. By designing actions to facilitate numerous opportunities for selection across biological and environmental conditions, we can allow nature to pick the winners and increase the probability that ecosystems continue to provide services to humans and other species.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28126409     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  7 in total

1.  Community-wide scan identifies fish species associated with coral reef services across the Indo-Pacific.

Authors:  Eva Maire; Sébastien Villéger; Nicholas A J Graham; Andrew S Hoey; Joshua Cinner; Sebastian C A Ferse; Catherine Aliaume; David J Booth; David A Feary; Michel Kulbicki; Stuart A Sandin; Laurent Vigliola; David Mouillot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Science-based approach to using growth rate to assess coral performance and restoration outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J Edmunds; Hollie M Putnam
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Using naturally occurring climate resilient corals to construct bleaching-resistant nurseries.

Authors:  Megan K Morikawa; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Artificial selection on reproductive timing in hatchery salmon drives a phenological shift and potential maladaptation to climate change.

Authors:  Michael D Tillotson; Heidy K Barnett; Mary Bhuthimethee; Michele E Koehler; Thomas P Quinn
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  A fast-moving target: achieving marine conservation goals under shifting climate and policies.

Authors:  Gil Rilov; Simonetta Fraschetti; Elena Gissi; Carlo Pipitone; Fabio Badalamenti; Laura Tamburello; Elisabetta Menini; Paul Goriup; Antonios D Mazaris; Joaquim Garrabou; Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi; Roberto Danovaro; Charles Loiseau; Joachim Claudet; Stelios Katsanevakis
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  The World Coral Conservatory (WCC): A Noah's ark for corals to support survival of reef ecosystems.

Authors:  Didier Zoccola; Nadia Ounais; Dominique Barthelemy; Robert Calcagno; Françoise Gaill; Stephane Henard; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Max Janse; Jean Jaubert; Hollie Putnam; Bernard Salvat; Christian R Voolstra; Denis Allemand
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Coral bleaching response is unaltered following acclimatization to reefs with distinct environmental conditions.

Authors:  Katie L Barott; Ariana S Huffmyer; Jennifer M Davidson; Elizabeth A Lenz; Shayle B Matsuda; Joshua R Hancock; Teegan Innis; Crawford Drury; Hollie M Putnam; Ruth D Gates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.