Literature DB >> 28125900

Geometry of the Valgus Knee: Contradicting the Dogma of a Femoral-Based Deformity.

Helge Eberbach1, Julian Mehl2, Matthias J Feucht1, Gerrit Bode1, Norbert P Südkamp1, Philipp Niemeyer1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Realignment osteotomies of valgus knee deformities are usually performed at the distal femur, as valgus alignment is considered to be a femoral-based deformity. This dogma, however, has not been proven in a large patient population. Valgus malalignment may also be caused by a tibial deformity or a combined tibial and femoral deformity.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the coronal geometry of patients with valgus malalignment and identify the location of the underlying deformity and (2) to investigate the proportion of cases that require realignment osteotomy at the tibia, the femur, or both locations to avoid an oblique joint line. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The analysis included 420 standing full-leg radiographs of patients with valgus malalignment (mechanical femorotibial angle [mFTA], ≥4°). A systematic analysis of the coronal leg geometry was performed including the mFTA, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint-line convergence angle (JLCA). The localization of the deformity was determined according to the malalignment test described by Paley, and patients were assigned to 1 of 4 groups: femoral-based valgus deformity, tibial-based valgus deformity, femoral- and tibial-based valgus deformity, or intra-articular/ligamentary-based valgus deformity. Subsequently, the ideal osteotomy site was identified with the goal of a postoperative change of the joint line of two different maximum values, ±2° and ±4°, from its physiological varus position of 3°.
RESULTS: Measurements of the coronal alignment revealed a mean (±SD) mFTA of 7.4° ± 4.3° (range, 4°-28.2°). The mean mLDFA and mean mMPTA were 84.8° ± 2.4° and 90.9° ± 2.6°, respectively. The mean JLCA was 1.2° ± 3.1°. The majority (41.0%) of valgus deformities were tibial based, 23.6% were femoral based, 26.9% were femoral and tibial based, and 8.6% were intra-articular/ligamentary based. To achieve a straight-leg axis and an anatomic postoperative joint line with a tolerance of ±4°, the ideal site of a corrective osteotomy was tibial in 55.2% of cases and femoral in 19.5% of cases. A double-level osteotomy would be necessary in 25.2% of cases. With a tolerance of ±2°, the ideal osteotomy site was the proximal tibia in 41.0% of cases and the distal femur in 13.6% of cases; a double-level osteotomy would be necessary in 45.5% of cases.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to the widespread belief that valgus malalignment is usually caused by a femoral deformity, this study found that valgus malalignment was attributable to tibial deformity in the majority of patients. In addition, a combined femoral- and tibial-based deformity was more common than an isolated femoral-based deformity. As a clinical consequence, varus osteotomies to treat lateral compartment osteoarthritis must be performed at the tibial site or as a double-level osteotomy in a relevant number of patients to avoid an oblique joint line.

Entities:  

Keywords:  joint line; osteoarthritis; osteotomy; valgus malalignment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28125900     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516676266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Over-voluming predicted by pre-operative planning in 24% of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Marmor; Eric Renault; Jeremy Valluy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Knee realignment osteotomy in adults].

Authors:  Markus Heinecke; Eric Röhner; Stefan Pietsch; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Medial meniscus extrusion increases with age and BMI and is depending on different loading conditions.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Wolf Petersen; Lukas Willinger; Andreas Sauter; Michael Rasper; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas B Imhoff; Theresa Diermeier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Smoking and obesity influence the risk of nonunion in lateral opening wedge, closing wedge and torsional distal femoral osteotomies.

Authors:  Franz Liska; Bernhard Haller; Andreas Voss; Julian Mehl; Florian B Imhoff; Lukas Willinger; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical outcome and success rates of ACI for cartilage defects of the patella: a subgroup analysis from a controlled randomized clinical phase II trial (CODIS study).

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Volker Laute; Wolfgang Zinser; Christoph Becher; Peter Diehl; Thomas Kolombe; Jakob Fay; Rainer Siebold; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  [Research progress of osteotomy around knee in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Yunfei Liu; Xuetao Xie; Congfeng Luo
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 7.  Optimizing indications and technique in osteotomies around the knee.

Authors:  Andrea Ferrera; Jacques Menetrey
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-06-08

8.  [Osteotomy close to the knee joint in adults].

Authors:  Markus Heinecke; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-04-13

9.  Factors Associated With Distal Femoral Osteotomy Survivorship: Data From the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) Registry.

Authors:  Cory K Mayfield; Ioanna K Bolia; Erik N Mayer; Keemia Soraya Heidari; Nathanael Heckmann; William C Pannell; Jeffrey Ryan Hill; Braden McKnight; C Thomas Vangsness; George F Hatch; Alexander E Weber
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-25

10.  Tibial and femoral osteotomies in varus deformities - radiological and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Julian Fürmetz; Sven Patzler; Florian Wolf; Nikolaus Degen; Wolf Christian Prall; Chris Soo; Wolfgang Böcker; Peter Helmut Thaller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.