| Literature DB >> 28124769 |
Pathmanathan Rajadurai1, Ho Kean Fatt2, Foo Yoke Ching3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Erbb2/HER2) overexpression, which was previously detected in invasive breast cancer, has now been implicated in advanced gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEC). A study was conducted to determine the rate of HER2 positivity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC and GEC in Malaysia and to assess the impact of various demographic and clinical parameters on HER2 positivity.Entities:
Keywords: DISH; Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal junction cancer; Genes; HER2; Immunohistochemistry; Malaysia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 28124769 PMCID: PMC5948243 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-9921-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer
Patient demographic and tumor characteristics (n = 228)
| Variable | Value, |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| M/F ratio | 142 (62.2)/86 (37.7) |
| Ethnicity | |
| Chinese | 169 (74.1) |
| Indian | 16 (7.0) |
| Malay | 15 (6.6) |
| Others | 28 (12.3) |
| Age (years; [mean ± SD]) | 60.3 ± 13.7 |
| Age group (years) | |
| ≤30 | 5 (2.2) |
| 31–45 | 31 (13.6) |
| 46–59 | 65 (28.5) |
| ≥ 60 | 127 (55.7) |
| HER2 expression | |
| Negative | 172 (75.4) |
| Positive | 56 (24.6) |
| Tumor location | |
| Gastric body | 175 (76.8) |
| GEC | 53 (23.3) |
| Tumor subtype | |
| Intestinal | 103 (45.2) |
| Diffuse | 94 (41.2) |
| Indeterminate | 29 (12.7) |
| Tumor differentiation | |
| Well differentiated | 6 (2.6) |
| Moderately differentiated | 97 (42.5) |
| Poorly differentiated | 125 (54.8) |
| TNM staging | |
| II | 6 (2.63) |
| III | 137 (60.08) |
| IV | 43 (18.85) |
| Not known | 42 (18.4) |
| c-ERB-2 gene amplification | |
| Amplified | 47 (20.61) |
Tumor characteristics by HER2 positivity
| Tumor characteristics | HER2-negative | HER2-positive |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.024* | ||
| Male | 100 (70.4) | 42 (29.6) | |
| Female | 72 (83.7) | 14 (16.3) | |
| Age group (years) | 0.382 | ||
| <30 | 5 (100) | 0 (0) | |
| 31–45 | 22 (71.0) | 9 (29.0) | |
| 46–60 | 53 (81.5) | 12 (18.5) | |
| >60 | 92 (72.4) | 35 (27.6) | |
| Ethnicity | 0.596 | ||
| Chinese | 129 (76.3) | 40 (23.7) | |
| Indian | 12 (75) | 4 (25) | |
| Malay | 8 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | |
| Others | 23 (82.1) | 5 (17.9) | |
| Tumor location | 0.070 | ||
| Gastric body | 137 (78.3) | 38 (21.7) | |
| GEC | 35 (66.0) | 18 (34.0) | |
| Tumor subtype | <0.001* | ||
| Intestinal | 80 (85.1) | 14 (14.9) | |
| Diffuse | 62 (60.2) | 41 (39.8) | |
| Indeterminate | 29 (100) | 0 (0) | |
| Tumor differentiation | 0.063 | ||
| Well differentiated | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | |
| Moderately differentiated | 68 (70.1) | 29 (29.9) | |
| Poorly differentiated | 101 (80.8) | 24 (19.2) | |
| TNM staging | 0.284 | ||
| II | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| III | 108 (75.8) | 29 (24.2) | |
| IV | 29 (67.4) | 14 (32.6) | |
| NK | 30 (71.4) | 12 (28.6) |
*p < 0.05
Fig. 1Association of HER2 status with different tumor subtypes
c-erb2 gene amplification
| No. of samples tested on DISH which are positive on IHC (2+ and 3+) ( | 44 (78.6) |
| Not tested | 12 (21.4) |
| Gene amplification ( | |
| Amplified | 40 (90.1) |
| Non-amplified | 4 (9.9) |