BACKGROUND: Iron supplementation is recommended for pregnant women to meet their iron requirement for a healthy pregnancy. The benefits and risks of universal iron supplementation during pregnancy in malaria endemic countries are currently being debated. As part of a broader study that focused on the effect of heme/HO-1 on pregnancy outcomes in malaria in pregnancy, we determined the association between iron supplementation and free heme levels in blood of pregnant women with and without malaria in Ghana. We hypothesized that pregnant women with malaria who took iron supplements will have higher levels of Heme/HO-1 than those who did not take iron supplements. METHODS: A total of 337 women were recruited for this study. Blood samples were collected for malaria diagnosis and heme/HO-1 measurement. Quantification of heme was done using a heme colorimetric assay kit and HO-1 levels were performed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) on plasma samples. RESULTS: Malaria positive iron supplemented women, in their third trimester, had significantly higher median levels of heme 59.3(43.1 - 60.4) than non-malaria iron supplemented women 35.7(33.0 - 62.2), p = 0.026. Also, malaria positive iron supplemented women had significant higher median levels of HO-16.2(IQR 4.9 - 8.1) than pregnant women who did not take iron supplements 2.9 (IQR 2.1 - 3.8), p = <0.001. CONCLUSION: Although iron supplementation may be highly beneficial and improve pregnancy outcomes for iron deficient or anemic mothers, it is also likely that iron supplementation for pregnant women who are not iron deficient may put this group of women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Findings from this study sheds light on the effect of iron supplementation on malaria derived heme in pregnancy, which may inform how iron supplementation is recommended for pregnant women who are not iron deficient.
BACKGROUND:Iron supplementation is recommended for pregnant women to meet their iron requirement for a healthy pregnancy. The benefits and risks of universal iron supplementation during pregnancy in malaria endemic countries are currently being debated. As part of a broader study that focused on the effect of heme/HO-1 on pregnancy outcomes in malaria in pregnancy, we determined the association between iron supplementation and free heme levels in blood of pregnant women with and without malaria in Ghana. We hypothesized that pregnant women with malaria who took iron supplements will have higher levels of Heme/HO-1 than those who did not take iron supplements. METHODS: A total of 337 women were recruited for this study. Blood samples were collected for malaria diagnosis and heme/HO-1 measurement. Quantification of heme was done using a heme colorimetric assay kit and HO-1 levels were performed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) on plasma samples. RESULTS:Malaria positive iron supplemented women, in their third trimester, had significantly higher median levels of heme 59.3(43.1 - 60.4) than non-malariairon supplemented women 35.7(33.0 - 62.2), p = 0.026. Also, malaria positive iron supplemented women had significant higher median levels of HO-16.2(IQR 4.9 - 8.1) than pregnant women who did not take iron supplements 2.9 (IQR 2.1 - 3.8), p = <0.001. CONCLUSION: Although iron supplementation may be highly beneficial and improve pregnancy outcomes for iron deficient or anemic mothers, it is also likely that iron supplementation for pregnant women who are not iron deficient may put this group of women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Findings from this study sheds light on the effect of iron supplementation on malaria derived heme in pregnancy, which may inform how iron supplementation is recommended for pregnant women who are not iron deficient.
Entities:
Keywords:
Heme; Heme oxygenase-1; Iron supplementation; Placental malaria; Preterm delivery
Authors: Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Tahmeed Ahmed; Robert E Black; Simon Cousens; Kathryn Dewey; Elsa Giugliani; Batool A Haider; Betty Kirkwood; Saul S Morris; H P S Sachdev; Meera Shekar Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ana Pamplona; Ana Ferreira; József Balla; Viktória Jeney; György Balla; Sabrina Epiphanio; Angelo Chora; Cristina D Rodrigues; Isabel Pombo Gregoire; Margarida Cunha-Rodrigues; Silvia Portugal; Miguel P Soares; Maria M Mota Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-05-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Adriana Harbuzariu; Sidney Pitts; Juan Carlos Cespedes; Keri Oxendine Harp; Annette Nti; Andrew P Shaw; Mingli Liu; Jonathan K Stiles Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Catherine D Morffy Smith; Brittany N Russ; Alicer K Andrew; Caitlin A Cooper; Julie M Moore Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.379