Further evidence for the variability of the 18S rDNA loci in the family Tingidae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera).

As of now, within the lace bug family Tingidae (Cimicomorpha), only 1.5% of the species described have been cytogenetically studied. In this paper, male karyotypes of Stephanitis caucasica, Stephanitis pyri, Physatocheila confinis, Lasiacantha capucina, Dictyla rotundata and Dictyla echii were studied using FISH mapping with an 18S rDNA marker. The results show variability: the major rDNA sites are predominantly located on a pair of autosomes but occasionally on the X and Y chromosomes. All currently available data on the distribution of the major rDNA in the Tingidae karyotypes are summarized and shortly discussed. Our main concern is to clarify whether the chromosomal position of rDNA loci can contribute to resolving the phylogenetic relationships among the Tingidae taxa.

Introduction

The true bug family is a relatively large and widespread group of phytophagous (sap-sucking) insects, some of which are important agricultural and forestry pests. The insects of this family are commonly known as the lace bugs due to a reticulation of the pronotum and fore wings. The family is included in the true bug infraorder PageBreak (, ) and considered as the closest relative to the family , lace bugs being either placed within the superfamily (Drake and Davis 1960, Schuh and Štys 1991, Schuh et al. 2006, 2009, etc.), or taken as an the independent superfamily close to the (Scudder 1959, Štys and Kerzhner 1975, Froeschner 1996, Golub and Popov 2016, etc.)

The relationships within the are not entirely clear (Guilbert et al. 2014). The family currently comprises approximately 2200 species classified in 280 genera (Golub and Popov 2012, Golub et al. 2012). However, chromosome sets of only 31 species (1.5%) and 17 genera (6%) are known up to now (Grozeva and Nokkala 2001, Golub et al. 2015, for other references see Ueshima 1979).

Like other , lace bugs possess holokinetic chromosomes characterized by a non-localised centromere (Hughes-Schrader and Schrader 1961, Ueshima 1979). In spite of several studies, the karyological evolution of the family remains poorly understood. The lace bugs’ karyotypes seem to be highly conserved, with 12 autosomes reported for all so far studied species; the autosomes represent a series gradually decreasing in size. Most species have an XY type of sex determination while a few species have an X(0) system.

Until recently, only conventional chromosome staining techniques were used for the . The first attempt to use a differential staining protocol was made by Grozeva and Nokkala (2001). They adapted C-banding to chromosomes of 13 species from 10 genera of lace bugs. This study revealed in karyotypes clear C-bands, which are useful for chromosome identification. Specifically, three species of the genus Westwood, 1840, sharing the same karyotype of 2n = 12 + X(0), were demonstrated to differ in the number, size and location of C-heterochromatin blocks. These findings showed that C-heterochromatin distribution has had a role in the karyotype evolution of the family .

A molecular hybridization technique such as is a very useful method for studying molecular structure of chromosomes and differentiating separate chromosomes in different species. The chromosomal location of the rRNA genes is currently the most widely exploited marker in comparative cytogenetics of the (for a review see Grozeva et al. 2014). The nuclear genes coding for the ribosomal RNA are organized into the two distinct multigene families: the major rDNA repeats (genes for the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNAs) and the minor rDNA repeats (genes for the 5S rRNA). The major rDNA sites are often arranged in tandem arrays and undergo concerted evolution (the co-evolution of DNA sequences) being mapped to the same chromosomal region in the species karyotypes. Recently we (Golub et al. 2015) reported for the first FISH with an 18S rDNA probe in four lace bug species and discussed usefulness of the major rRNA gene cluster as a marker for revealing differences between species with similar karyotypes.

fluorescence in situ hybridization

In the context of the above studies, we examined here the location of the 18S rDNA loci through FISH in six further species from the genera Stål, 1873, Fieber, 1861, Stål, 1874 and Stål, 1873. The standard karyotypes of four species, , , and were studied for the first time.

Materials and methods

The lace bug species used here were collected in 2015 in the Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus and in Voronezh Province, Russia (Table 1). The species identification was made by V. Golub.

Table 1.

Material used for chromosome analysis.

Species	Number of males examined	Host plant, date and locality of collection
Dictyla echii (Schrank, 1782)	6	Echium sp., 22-26.07.2015, Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus, Russia.
Dictyla rotundata (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835)	9	Echium sp., 27.07.2015, Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus, Russia.
Lasiacantha capucina (Germar, 1837)	3	Thymus sp., 02.08.2015, Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus, Russia.
Physatocheila confinis (Horváth, 1906)	3	Crataegus sp., 2.08.2015, Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus, Russia.
Stephanitis caucasica Kiritshenko, 1939	12	Rhododendron caucasicum Pallas, 1786, 30.07.2015, Teberda Nature Reserve, North Caucasus, Russia.
Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775)	8	Malus sp., Pyrus sp., 15.08.2015, Voronezh Prov., Russia.

Only males were used in chromosome analysis. The specimens were fixed in the field in 3:1 Carnoy solution (96% ethanol: glacial acetic acid) and stored at 4°C. In the laboratory, testes were dissected out in a drop of 45% acetic acid and squashed on the slide. The cover slips were removed using dry ice. The preparations were stained using a Feulgen-Giemsa method by Grozeva and Nokkala (1996). To determine the number and chromosomal position of the major rDNA clusters, we carried out 18S rDNA FISH on meiotic chromosomes. In fluorescence in situ hybridization we followed Grozeva et al. (2014) protocol with some modifications described in Golub et al. (2015).

Chromosome slides were analyzed under a Leica DM 6000 B microscope. Images were taken with a Leica DFC 345 FX camera using Leica Application Suite 3.7 software with an Image Overlay module.

Results

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: absent

At spermatocyte , six bivalents of autosomes and X and Y univalent chromosomes are present suggesting diploid karyotype of 2n = 14 (12 + XY). All bivalents are of similar size. The sex chromosomes show different sizes, the larger being PageBreakPageBreakpresumably the X, and are situated alongside each other (Fig. 1). During an all chromosomes undergo segregation, with X and Y chromosomes segregating ahead of the autosomes (Fig. 2).

Figures 1–11.

Meiotic chromosomes of the species with 2n = 12 + XY studied using conventional staining technique and 18S rDNA FISH. 1–3 1, 2 conventional staining: MI (1), AI (2) 3 FISH: MI 4, 5 4 conventional staining: MI 5 FISH: MI 6, 7 6 conventional staining: MI/AI transition 7 FISH: early MI 8, 9 8 conventional staining: MI 9 FISH: MI 10 FISH: early MI 11 FISH: prophase I. rDNA FISH signals are indicated by arrows. X and Y chromosomes are indicated by arrowheads. Bar = 10µm.

metaphase I

anaphase I

18S rDNA FISH resulted in bright signals on an autosomal bivalent at MI. The signals are most likely located subterminally on each homolog. Sex chromosomes are placed very close to each other (Fig. 3).

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: absent

At spermatocyte MI, six bivalents of autosomes and X and Y univalent chromosomes are present suggesting diploid karyotype of 2n = 14 (12 + XY). All bivalents are of similar size. The sex chromosomes show slightly different sizes, the larger being presumably the X, and are situated alongside each other (Fig. 4).

18S rDNA FISH resulted in bright signals on an autosomal bivalent at MI. The signals are located interstitially on each homolog. The sex chromosomes are mutually co-orientated on the spindle (Fig. 5).

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: absent

At spermatocyte MI/AI transition, six bivalents of autosomes and X and Y univalent chromosomes are present suggesting diploid karyotype of 2n = 14 (12 + XY). All bivalents are of similar size. The sex chromosomes show distinctly different sizes, the larger being presumably the X. The sex chromosomes segregate ahead of the autosomes (Fig. 6).

18S rDNA FISH resulted in bright signals on an autosomal bivalent at MI. The signals are located interstitially on each homolog (Fig. 7).

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: absent

At spermatocyte MI, six bivalents of autosomes and X and Y univalent chromosomes are present suggesting diploid karyotype of 2n = 14 (12 + XY). All bivalents are of similar size. The sex chromosomes show a similar size and are situated alongside each other (Fig. 8).

18S rDNA FISH resulted in bright signals on an autosomal bivalent at MI. The signals are located interstitially on each homolog (Fig. 9).

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: 2n = 14 (12 + XY) in Grozeva and Nokkala (2001)

At early spermatocyte MI, there are six bivalents of autosomes and X and Y univalent chromosomes. All bivalents are of similar size. The sex chromosomes show a similar size and are placed not far from each other. Bright 18S rDNA FISH signals are located at one end of each sex chromosome (Fig. 10).

, 2n = 14 (12 + XY)

Published data: 2n = 14 (12 + XY) in Grozeva and Nokkala (2001)

At spermatocyte prophase I, there are six bivalents of autosomes which have diffuse structure at this stage. The X and Y chromosomes are positively heteropycnotic and placed very close to each other. Bright 18S rDNA FISH signals are located interstitially on each homolog of a bivalent (Fig. 11).

Discussion

Comparative karyotype analysis of six lace bug species was achieved using standard chromosome staining along with the 18S rDNA FISH marker. All species were found to have 2n = 14 (12 + XY). The karyotypes of , , and were studied for the first time. The karyotypes of and were previously studied by Grozeva and Nokkala (2001) who also reported 2n = 14 (12 + XY) for each of these species.

The results of this study confirmed the assumption of the high degree of karyotype conservation for the (Ueshima 1979, Grozeva and Nokkala 2001, Golub et al. 2015). Including our new data, a total of 35 species from 17 genera were karyologically studied, but this represents less than 2% of known lace bug species of the world fauna. All studied species have the same number of autosomes, i.e., 12 in diploid karyotypes. The only exception might be (Fallén, 1807), for which different authors reported karyotypes of 2n = 12 + X(0) and 2n = 10 + XY discovered in populations from Finland and British Isles respectively (Southwood and Leston 1959, Grozeva and Nokkala 2001; for discussion, see Golub et al. 2015). Considering that have holokinetic chromosomes, which are assumed to be susceptible to fission and fusion (Hughes-Schrader 1935), the conservation of the autosome number suggests that these rearrangements are not characteristic of lace bugs. This is supported also by the fact that in all tingid species the autosomes are of similar size, the pattern which can be considered as a ground plan feature of the family.

Despite the relative conservatism of the karyotype structure in general, some lace bug species clearly differ in size of sex chromosomes. For example, X and Y chromosomes appear noticeably heteromorphic in size in , while they are evenly-sized in and (Figs 6–10). Of particular interest, detectable size differences may provide an important criterion for identification of some closely related species. For example, possesses an enlarged X chromosome in comparison to the Y, whereas in both sex chromosomes appear similar in size (Figs 1–5).

Some other true bug families also demonstrate interspecies difference in size of sex chromosomes (Bardella et al. 2014, Fairbairn et al. 2016). One of the important sources of chromosome size variability seems to be related to the constitutive heterochromatin variation (White 1973). A series of lace bug species studied by C-banding was shown to differ considerably in the C-heterochromatin content and its location. Most significant variation occurs in sex chromosomes, which appear variously heterochromatin-rich in different species (Grozeva and Nokkala 2001). Although no direct information is available, the X and Y chromosome variation might be a consequence of gain and loss of heterochromatic segments during the evolution of the sex chromosomes in the .

In the , the major rRNA gene FISH has yielded a significant body of literature (Grozeva et al. 2011, Panzera et al. 2012, Pita et al. 2013, Bardella et al. 2013, Chirino et al. 2013, Grozeva et al. 2014). These studies have shown that the major rDNA cluster is localized variously in tested families (reviewed in Grozeva et al. 2014). However in the , only 10 species have been analyzed to date (Golub et al. 2015, present paper). The mapping results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Distribution of the major rDNA loci in the .

Species	Karyotype	18S rDNA-bearing chromosomes	The chromosomal location of 18S rDNA clusters	References
Agramma femorale Thomson, 1871	12 + XY	X	Subterminal	Golub et al. 2015
Dictyla echii (Schrank, 1782)	12 + XY	XY	Subterminal both on X and Y	Present paper
Dictyla rotundata (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835)	12 + XY	AA	Interstitial	Present paper
Elasmotropis testacea testacea (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1830)	12 + XY	AA	Subterminal	Golub et al. 2015
Lasiacantha capucina (Germar, 1837)	12 + XY	AA	Interstitial	Present paper
Physatocheila confinis (Horvath, 1906)	12 + XY	AA	Interstitial	Present paper
Stephanitis caucasica Kiritshenko, 1939	12 + XY	AA	Subterminal	Present paper
Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775)	12 + XY	AA	Interstitial	Present paper
Tingis crispata (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1838)	12 + XY	X,Y*	Interstitial on X, subterminal on Y	Golub et al. 2015
Tingis cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)	12 + XY	AA**	Interstitial	Golub et al. 2015

*X,Y – sex chromosomes; **AA – autosomal bivalent

Despite the same chromosome number, the 18S rDNA clusters were found to vary in number (one or two in diploid karyotype) and location (sex chromosomes or autosomes) in lace bug species. The rDNA signals were observed either on the X chromosome as in , or on both sex chromosomes as in and , or on a pair of autosomes as in the remaining species. The congeneric species can demonstrate both similarity and dissimilarity in the rDNA location pattern. For example, both studied species ( and ) were found to have rDNA clusters on autosomes. A different situation arises with genera Fabricius, 1803 and , where the congeneric species have rDNA either on autosomes or on sex chromosomes. Different mechanisms have been appointed to play a role in the rDNA evolutionary dynamics, particularly the transposition of the rRNA genes to new chromosome location in closely related species without changes in chromosome number (e.g., Granger et al. 2004, Cabrero and Camacho 2008, Nguyen et al. 2010, Panzera et al. 2012, Pita et al. 2013) and were mentioned in our previous publication (Golub et al. 2015).

Besides, the interspecific differences were found in the position of 18S rDNA clusters within chromosomes – subterminal or interstitial, and such differences are occurring likewise in congeneric species (Table 2). Specifically, subterminal clusters PageBreakappeared in autosomes of , and ; in the X chromosome of ; in the Y chromosome of ; and in both sex chromosomes of . Furthermore, interstitial (intercalary) clusters appeared in the X chromosome of but in autosomes of , and (Table 2). Differences observed within the genus indicate that in its evolution an inversion has occurred which changed the subterminal rDNA locus in to an interstitial position in or vice versa.

The results presented here show that the major rDNA loci in the lace bug karyotypes may be considered as essential cytological markers to compare karyotypes of phylogenetically related species and to disclose chromosomal differentiation in species with similar karyotypes. This is likewise true for the species of the subfamily () which share the karyotype of 2n = 12 + XY and show extremely high dynamics of rDNA clusters, with the variation observed both between and within the species (Panzera et al. 2012, 2014, Bardella et al. 2013, Pita et al. 2013). Because of this, the chromosomal position of rDNA loci might be a useful marker for identifying recently diverged species or populations (Pita et al. 2013).

Based on the currently available data, the autosomal major rRNA gene location appears prevalent in the being found in 6 genera out of the 7 genera tested. The occurrence of major rDNA sites in autosomes of the is similar to the pattern that is most frequent in the order (e.g., Panzera et al. 2012,PageBreak Pita et al. 2013, Bardella et al. 2014, Grozeva et al. 2014). Because lace bugs have holokinetic chromosomes (without morphological markers such as centromeres), rather small chromosome size and similar karyotype structure (with all the autosomes being of similar size, so that in conventionally stained preparations the bivalents cannot be recognized on the basis of their size), it is uncertain whether an rDNA-bearing pair of autosomes is the same (homeologous) in different species. The resolution of this important issue will have to await further study based on new approaches and new discriminatory chromosomal landmarks.

In summary, the interspecific similarities and differences in the distribution of the major rDNA clusters make them promising markers for the further study of chromosome evolution in lace bugs. However, because of insufficient taxon sampling, the currently available data are inadequate to clarify the phylogenetic relationships within the .