| Literature DB >> 28123536 |
Hao Wu1, Cheng Lu1, Ming Chen1.
Abstract
The effects between minimally invasive percutaneous laser ablation and open surgery in the treatment of children with osteoid osteoma were compared in the present study. A total of 72 cases of children with osteoid osteoma were divided into control and observational groups, containing 36 cases in each group. The control group underwent conventional open surgery while the observational group underwent minimally invasive CT guided percutaneous laser ablation. Effects of both operations were compared. The operation duration, blood loss and plaster fixation duration of the observational group were significantly less than those of the control group. The postoperative pain score (VAS) at 1 day and 7 days were significantly lower than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The lesion resection rate, effective rate of bone hyperplasia, effective rate of swelling and effusion and total effective rate of the observational group were significantly higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Incidence of adverse reactions of observational group was significantly lower (P<0.05) than that of the control group. However, the difference was not significant when comparing 1-year recurrence rate for the two groups. The minimally invasive percutaneous laser ablation has better surgery effects compared with open surgery in the treatment of children with osteoid osteoma.Entities:
Keywords: effective rate; minimally invasive percutaneous laser ablation; osteoid osteoma of children; recurrence rate
Year: 2016 PMID: 28123536 PMCID: PMC5244906 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Comparison of surgical indexes.
| VAS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Operation duration (min) | Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | Gypsum fixation duration (days) | Preoperative | Postoperative day 1 | Postoperative day 7 |
| Control | 72.4±13.3 | 213.5±34.7 | 6.8±1.3 | 3.2±0.7 | 4.5±1.2 | 2.2±0.6 |
| Observation | 46.8±12.2 | 64.9±21.6 | 2.6±1.0 | 3.3±0.6 | 2.1±0.4 | 0.3±0.1 |
| t-test | 4.968 | 6.532 | 5.120 | 0.322 | 6.127 | 5.857 |
| P-value | 0.036 | 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.864 | 0.021 | 0.025 |
VAS, postoperative pain score.
Comparison of lesion resection rate and effective rate of treatment [case (%)].
| Groups | Cases | Lesion resection rate | Effective rate of tumor nest volume | Effective rate of bone hyperplasia | Effective rate of swelling and effusion | Total effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 36 | 26 (72.2) | 33 (91.7) | 23 (63.9) | 25 (69.4) | 22 (61.1) |
| Observational | 36 | 33 (91.7) | 35 (97.2) | 32 (88.9) | 33 (91.7) | 34 (94.4) |
| χ2 | 4.600 | 0.265 | 6.237 | 5.675 | 11.571 | |
| P-value | 0.032 | 0.607 | 0.013 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Comparison of adverse reactions and recurrence rate [case (%)].
| Groups | Cases | Infection | Injury of nerves, mules, blood vessels | Non-ideal recovery of limb function | The adverse reaction rate | Recurrence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 36 | 3 (8.3) | 3 (8.3) | 4 (11.1) | 10 (27.8) | 3 (8.3) |
| Observational | 36 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 3 (8.3) | 1 (2.8) |
| χ2 | 4.600 | 0.265 | ||||
| P-value | 0.032 | 0.607 |