| Literature DB >> 28123452 |
Giovanni Nastasi1, Carla Miceli1, Valeria Pittalà1, Maria N Modica1, Orazio Prezzavento1, Giuseppe Romeo1, Antonio Rescifina1, Agostino Marrazzo1, Emanuele Amata1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sigma (σ) receptors are accepted as a particular receptor class consisting of two subtypes: sigma-1 (σ1) and sigma-2 (σ2). The two receptor subtypes have specific drug actions, pharmacological profiles and molecular characteristics. The σ2 receptor is overexpressed in several tumor cell lines, and its ligands are currently under investigation for their role in tumor diagnosis and treatment. The σ2 receptor structure has not been disclosed, and researchers rely on σ2 receptor radioligand binding assay to understand the receptor's pharmacological behavior and design new lead compounds. DESCRIPTION: Here we present the sigma-2 Receptor Selective Ligands Database (S2RSLDB) a manually curated database of the σ2 receptor selective ligands containing more than 650 compounds. The database is built with chemical structure information, radioligand binding affinity data, computed physicochemical properties, and experimental radioligand binding procedures. The S2RSLDB is freely available online without account login and having a powerful search engine the user may build complex queries, sort tabulated results, generate color coded 2D and 3D graphs and download the data for additional screening.Entities:
Keywords: 2D plot; 3D plot; Central nervous system multiparameter optimization; Drug design; Lipinski’s rule of five; Online ligand database; S2RSLDB; Sigma receptor; Sigma-2 receptor; Structure search
Year: 2017 PMID: 28123452 PMCID: PMC5250622 DOI: 10.1186/s13321-017-0191-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cheminform ISSN: 1758-2946 Impact factor: 5.514
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the S2RSLDB configuration
Fig. 2Distribution of the physicochemical properties of the compounds in the database
Fig. 3Screenshots of the compound search page set with 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline substructure search and Lipinski’s rule of five filter (a), tabulated results page (b), and compound summary page (c)
Fig. 42D (a) and 3D (b) scatter distribution (website screenshots) of compound’s σ2 K i versus σ1/σ2 ratio and of compound’s σ2 pK i versus MW versus logP color coded by CNS MPO score (2D) and Lipinski’s rule of five filter (3D), and two compounds together with their property summaries