Claire Hoffmire1, Brady Stephens2, Sybil Morley3, Caitlin Thompson4, Janet Kemp2, Robert M Bossarte3. 1. Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver, CO, USA. 2. Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, NY, USA. 3. Epidemiology Program, Post-Deployment Health, Office of Public Health, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Suicide Prevention Program, Mental Health Services, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The US Department of Veterans Affairs' Suicide Prevention Applications Network (SPAN) is a national system for suicide event tracking and case management. The objective of this study was to assess data on suicide attempts among people using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services. METHODS: We assessed the degree of data overlap on suicide attempters reported in SPAN and the VHA's medical records from October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2014-overall, by year, and by region. Data on suicide attempters in the VHA's medical records consisted of diagnoses documented with E95 codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. RESULTS: Of 50 518 VHA patients who attempted suicide during the 4-year study period, data on fewer than half (41%) were reported in both SPAN and the medical records; nearly 65% of patients whose suicide attempt was recorded in SPAN had no data on attempted suicide in the VHA's medical records. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of administrative data suggests that use of SPAN substantially increases the collection of data on suicide attempters as compared with the use of medical records alone, but neither SPAN nor the VHA's medical records identify all suicide attempters. Further research is needed to better understand the strengths and limitations of both systems and how to best combine information across systems.
OBJECTIVES: The US Department of Veterans Affairs' Suicide Prevention Applications Network (SPAN) is a national system for suicide event tracking and case management. The objective of this study was to assess data on suicide attempts among people using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services. METHODS: We assessed the degree of data overlap on suicide attempters reported in SPAN and the VHA's medical records from October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2014-overall, by year, and by region. Data on suicide attempters in the VHA's medical records consisted of diagnoses documented with E95 codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. RESULTS: Of 50 518 VHA patients who attempted suicide during the 4-year study period, data on fewer than half (41%) were reported in both SPAN and the medical records; nearly 65% of patients whose suicide attempt was recorded in SPAN had no data on attempted suicide in the VHA's medical records. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of administrative data suggests that use of SPAN substantially increases the collection of data on suicide attempters as compared with the use of medical records alone, but neither SPAN nor the VHA's medical records identify all suicide attempters. Further research is needed to better understand the strengths and limitations of both systems and how to best combine information across systems.
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Steven G Heeringa; Kenneth L Cox; James A Naifeh; Carol S Fullerton; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Pablo A Aliaga; Patti Vegella; Holly Herberman Mash; Christina Buckley; Lisa J Colpe; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: Alex S Cohen; Taylor Fedechko; Elana K Schwartz; Thanh P Le; Peter W Foltz; Jared Bernstein; Jian Cheng; Elizabeth Rosenfeld; Brita Elvevåg Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: John R Blosnich; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Melissa E Dichter; Adam J Gordon; Dio Kavalieratos; Laura Taylor; Bryan Ketterer; Robert M Bossarte Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Esther L Meerwijk; Mary Jo Larson; Eric M Schmidt; Rachel Sayko Adams; Mark R Bauer; Grant A Ritter; Chester Buckenmaier; Alex H S Harris Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jill E Lavigne; Kwan Hur; Cathleen Kane; Anthony Au; Todd M Bishop; Wilfred R Pigeon Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ruth T Morin; Yixia Li; R Scott Mackin; Mary A Whooley; Yeates Conwell; Amy L Byers Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lisa C Barry; David C Steffens; Kenneth E Covinsky; Yeates Conwell; Yixia Li; Amy L Byers Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Barbara Stanley; Gregory K Brown; Lisa A Brenner; Hanga C Galfalvy; Glenn W Currier; Kerry L Knox; Sadia R Chaudhury; Ashley L Bush; Kelly L Green Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Robert M Bossarte; Alex Luedtke; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jose R Zubizarreta Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 15.992