Literature DB >> 28123114

Split Scores: A Tool to Quantify Phylogenetic Signal in Genome-Scale Data.

Elizabeth S Allman1, Laura S Kubatko2, John A Rhodes1.   

Abstract

Detecting variation in the evolutionary process along chromosomes is increasingly important as whole-genome data become more widely available. For example, factors such as incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, and chromosomal inversion are expected to result in changes in the underlying gene trees along a chromosome, while changes in selective pressure and mutational rates for different genomic regions may lead to shifts in the underlying mutational process. We propose the split score as a general method for quantifying support for a particular phylogenetic relationship within a genomic data set. Because the split score is based on algebraic properties of a matrix of site pattern frequencies, it can be rapidly computed, even for data sets that are large in the number of taxa and/or in the length of the alignment, providing an advantage over other methods (e.g., maximum likelihood) that are often used to assess such support. Using simulation, we explore the properties of the split score, including its dependence on sequence length, branch length, size of a split and its ability to detect true splits in the underlying tree. Using a sliding window analysis, we show that split scores can be used to detect changes in the underlying evolutionary process for genome-scale data from primates, mosquitoes, and viruses in a computationally efficient manner. Computation of the split score has been implemented in the software package SplitSup.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  General Markov model; genome-scale data analysis; matrix flattenings; phylogenetic trees; singular value decomposition; split scores

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123114      PMCID: PMC6075200          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  26 in total

1.  Phylogenetic invariants for the general Markov model of sequence mutation.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; John A Rhodes
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Mechanized derivation of linear invariants.

Authors:  J A Cavender
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Toric ideals of phylogenetic invariants.

Authors:  Bernd Sturmfels; Seth Sullivant
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Construction of linear invariants in phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  The identifiability of tree topology for phylogenetic models, including covarion and mixture models.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; John A Rhodes
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution.

Authors:  C Tuffley; M Steel
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Complete families of linear invariants for some stochastic models of sequence evolution, with and without the molecular clock assumption.

Authors:  M D Hendy; D Penny
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Hypothesis tests for phylogenetic quartets, with applications to coalescent-based species tree inference.

Authors:  Jeff Gaither; Laura Kubatko
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.

Authors:  J A Lake
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model.

Authors:  Asger Hobolth; Ole F Christensen; Thomas Mailund; Mikkel H Schierup
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

1.  On the Need for New Measures of Phylogenomic Support.

Authors:  Robert C Thomson; Jeremy M Brown
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.