Literature DB >> 28123021

Differential Encoding of Time by Prefrontal and Striatal Network Dynamics.

Konstantin I Bakhurin1, Vishwa Goudar2, Justin L Shobe2, Leslie D Claar3, Dean V Buonomano2,4,5, Sotiris C Masmanidis6,5,7.   

Abstract

Telling time is fundamental to many forms of learning and behavior, including the anticipation of rewarding events. Although the neural mechanisms underlying timing remain unknown, computational models have proposed that the brain represents time in the dynamics of neural networks. Consistent with this hypothesis, changing patterns of neural activity dynamically in a number of brain areas-including the striatum and cortex-has been shown to encode elapsed time. To date, however, no studies have explicitly quantified and contrasted how well different areas encode time by recording large numbers of units simultaneously from more than one area. Here, we performed large-scale extracellular recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice that learned the temporal relationship between a stimulus and a reward and reported their response with anticipatory licking. We used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. Both the striatal and cortical networks encoded time, but the striatal network outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex, a finding replicated both in simultaneously and nonsimultaneously recorded corticostriatal datasets. The striatal network was also more reliable in predicting when the animals would lick up to ∼1 s before the actual lick occurred. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that temporal information is encoded in a widely distributed manner throughout multiple brain areas, but that the striatum may have a privileged role in timing because it has a more accurate "clock" as it integrates information across multiple cortical areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The neural representation of time is thought to be distributed across multiple functionally specialized brain structures, including the striatum and cortex. However, until now, the neural code for time has not been compared quantitatively between these areas. Here, we performed large-scale recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice trained on a stimulus-reward association task involving a delay period and used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of simultaneously recorded neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. We found that, although both areas encoded time, the striatum consistently outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex. These results suggest that the striatum may refine the code for time by integrating information from multiple inputs.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/370854-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decoding; machine-learning algorithm; neural dynamics; orbitofrontal cortex; striatum; time coding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123021      PMCID: PMC5296780          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1789-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  93 in total

1.  Spontaneous activity of neostriatal cholinergic interneurons in vitro.

Authors:  B D Bennett; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cue-evoked firing of nucleus accumbens neurons encodes motivational significance during a discriminative stimulus task.

Authors:  Saleem M Nicola; Irene A Yun; Ken T Wakabayashi; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges.

Authors:  Emery N Brown; Robert E Kass; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum.

Authors:  Pieter Voorn; Louk J M J Vanderschuren; Henk J Groenewegen; Trevor W Robbins; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks.

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Temporal filtering by prefrontal neurons in duration discrimination.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Oshio; Atsushi Chiba; Masahiko Inase
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Effect of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on temporal discounting in rats.

Authors:  Suhyun Jo; Ko-Un Kim; Daeyeol Lee; Min Whan Jung
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Recurrent Network Models of Sequence Generation and Memory.

Authors:  Kanaka Rajan; Christopher D Harvey; David W Tank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Recurrent collateral connections of striatal medium spiny neurons are disrupted in models of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Stefano Taverna; Ema Ilijic; D James Surmeier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  45 in total

1.  Differential encoding of action selection by orbitofrontal and striatal population dynamics.

Authors:  Long Yang; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  A Dynamical Systems Perspective on Flexible Motor Timing.

Authors:  Evan D Remington; Seth W Egger; Devika Narain; Jing Wang; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Encoding Time in Feedforward Trajectories of a Recurrent Neural Network Model.

Authors:  N F Hardy; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Rodent Medial Frontal Control of Temporal Processing in the Dorsomedial Striatum.

Authors:  Eric B Emmons; Benjamin J De Corte; Youngcho Kim; Krystal L Parker; Matthew S Matell; Nandakumar S Narayanan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses.

Authors:  Bernard Bloem; Rafiq Huda; Mriganka Sur; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Learning multiple variable-speed sequences in striatum via cortical tutoring.

Authors:  James M Murray; G Sean Escola
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Believing in dopamine.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Turning the body into a clock: Accurate timing is facilitated by simple stereotyped interactions with the environment.

Authors:  Mostafa Safaie; Maria-Teresa Jurado-Parras; Stefania Sarno; Jordane Louis; Corane Karoutchi; Ludovic F Petit; Matthieu O Pasquet; Christophe Eloy; David Robbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Open source silicon microprobes for high throughput neural recording.

Authors:  Long Yang; Kwang Lee; Jomar Villagracia; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Striatal network modeling in Huntington's Disease.

Authors:  Adam Ponzi; Scott J Barton; Kendra D Bunner; Claudia Rangel-Barajas; Emily S Zhang; Benjamin R Miller; George V Rebec; James Kozloski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.