| Literature DB >> 28122951 |
Christopher M Hollenbeck1, David S Portnoy2, Dana Wetzel3, Tracy A Sherwood3, Paul B Samollow4, John R Gold2.
Abstract
Developments in next-generation sequencing allow genotyping of thousands of genetic markers across hundreds of individuals in a cost-effective manner. Because of this, it is now possible to rapidly produce dense genetic linkage maps for nonmodel species. Here, we report a dense genetic linkage map for red drum, a marine fish species of considerable economic importance in the southeastern United States and elsewhere. We used a prior microsatellite-based linkage map as a framework and incorporated 1794 haplotyped contigs derived from high-throughput, reduced representation DNA sequencing to produce a linkage map containing 1794 haplotyped restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) contigs, 437 anonymous microsatellites, and 44 expressed sequence-tag-linked microsatellites (EST-SSRs). A total of 274 candidate genes, identified from transcripts from a preliminary hydrocarbon exposure study, were localized to specific chromosomes, using a shared synteny approach. The linkage map will be a useful resource for red drum commercial and restoration aquaculture, and for better understanding and managing populations of red drum in the wild.Entities:
Keywords: RAD-seq; SNPs; genetic map; haplotypes; synteny
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28122951 PMCID: PMC5345714 DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.036350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Red drum consensus linkage map.
Summary statistics for red drum linkage maps
| 2275 | 1001 | 1569 | 720 | 674 | 961 | 976 | |
| 437 | 327 | 334 | 238 | 241 | 194 | 190 | |
| 44 | 33 | 32 | 27 | 25 | 23 | 20 | |
| 1794 | 641 | 1203 | 455 | 408 | 744 | 766 | |
| 3462 | 1170 | 2456 | 910 | 884 | 1693 | 1768 | |
| 87.721 | 77.735 | 70.084 | 75.961 | 74.102 | 73.422 | 63.634 | |
| 94.792 | 41.708 | 65.375 | 30 | 28.083 | 40.042 | 40.667 | |
| 0.935 | 1.91 | 1.087 | 2.606 | 2.73 | 1.869 | 1.595 | |
| 2105.3 | 1865.7 | 1682.0 | 1823.1 | 1778.4 | 1762.1 | 1527.2 |
Column names represent maps constructed using various subsets of mapping individuals: Consensus, Consensus map with all individuals; Family A, Family-specific map for Family A (male and female); Family B, Family-specific map for Family B (male and female); AF, Family A female; AM, Family A male; BF, Family B female; BM, Family B male. Mean linkage groups (LG) size, mean marker interval, and total map length are measured in centiMorgans.
Summary statistics for shared synteny analysis
| European seabass | 1249 | 284 | 3.141 | 0.8 | 3.247 | 239.1 | 922.11 | 0.413 | 0.438 | |
| Barramundi | 1156 | 266 | 3.192 | 0.9 | 3.417 | 240 | 908.95 | 0.409 | 0.432 | |
| Nile tilapia | 736 | 172 | 3.163 | 1.5 | 4.343 | 259 | 747.01 | 0.394 | 0.355 | |
| Stickleback | 600 | 150 | 3.047 | 1.1 | 5.39 | 167.3 | 808.44 | 0.361 | 0.384 | |
| Fugu | 399 | 97 | 3.196 | 1.2 | 9.147 | 113.6 | 887.27 | 0.404 | 0.421 | |
| Green spotted puffer | 342 | 87 | 3.057 | 1.1 | 7.976 | 92.9 | 693.92 | 0.386 | 0.330 |
BLAST Hits, number of single BLAST hits to the comparison species genome; Number of Blocks, number of regions of shared synteny containing at least two loci between red drum and each comparison species; Mean Loci per Block, average number of loci in blocks of shared synteny; Mean Comparison/Map Block Size, average size in megabase pairs and centiMorgans of blocks in the comparison species genome and red drum linkage map, respectively; Total Comparison/Map Block Size, total, cumulative size in megabase pairs and centiMorgans of blocks in the comparison species genome and red drum linkage map, respectively; Proportion of Genome/Map in Blocks, proportion of the comparison species genome/linkage map that exists in blocks of shared synteny, calculated based on the total number of base pairs in chromosomal scaffolds and total linkage map size.
Figure 2Circular ideogram of shared synteny analysis. Gray rectangles on the outside perimeter represent red drum linkage groups. Colored segments on the inside of the circle represent blocks of shared synteny between the red drum genetic map and genomes of six comparison species: red: stickleback (Gasterosteus aculatus); blue: Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus); teal: green spotted puffer (Tetraodon nigroviridis), green: fugu (Takifugu rubripes); dark gray: European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax); purple: barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Dark red regions on the outside of the circle represent regions where differentially expressed genes in oil exposure experiments were localized via a synteny-based mapping approach. Putative gene locations that overlap are vertically stacked for clarity.
Figure 3Shared syntenic blocks and synteny-mapped genes on red drum linkage group 22. Colored rectangles represent blocks of shared synteny between the red drum genetic map (horizontal axis) and genomes of six comparison species. Dark-red line segments represent regions where differentially expressed genes in oil exposure experiments were localized via a synteny-based mapping approach. Asterisks denote locations of genes that were synteny-mapped to zero-recombination intervals on the linkage map.