Literature DB >> 28122669

Active immunization of cattle with a bothropic toxoid does not abrogate envenomation by Bothrops asper venom, but increases the likelihood of survival.

María Herrera1, Katherine González2, Carlos Rodríguez3, Aarón Gómez2, Álvaro Segura2, Mariángela Vargas2, Mauren Villalta2, Ricardo Estrada2, Guillermo León4.   

Abstract

This study assessed the protective effect of active immunization of cattle to prevent the envenomation induced by B. asper venom. Two groups of oxen were immunized with a bothropic toxoid and challenged by an intramuscular injection of either 10 or 50 mg B. asper venom, to induce moderate or severe envenomations, respectively. Non-immunized oxen were used as controls. It was found that immunized oxen developed local edema similar to those observed in non-immunized animals. However, systemic effects were totally prevented in immunized oxen challenged with 10 mg venom, and therefore antivenom treatment was not required. When immunized oxen were challenged with 50 mg venom, coagulopathy was manifested 3-16 h later than in non-immunized oxen, demonstrating a delay in the onset of systemic envenomation. In these animals, active immunization did not eliminate the need for antivenom treatment, but increased the time lapse in which antivenom administration is still effective. All experimentally envenomed oxen completely recovered after a week following venom injection. Our results suggest that immunization of cattle with a bothropic toxoid prevents the development of systemic effects in moderate envenomations by B. asper, but does not abrogate these effects in severe envenomation.
Copyright © 2016 International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bothropic toxoid; Bothrops asper; Cattle; Snake antivenom; Snakebite envenomation; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28122669     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  3 in total

1.  Snakebite envenoming from an Ecohealth perspective.

Authors:  José María Gutiérrez
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2020-05-23

2.  Snakebite and its impact in rural communities: The need for a One Health approach.

Authors:  Sara Babo Martins; Isabelle Bolon; François Chappuis; Nicolas Ray; Gabriel Alcoba; Carlos Ochoa; Sanjib Kumar Sharma; Armand S Nkwescheu; Franck Wanda; Andrew M Durso; Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-09-26

3.  What is the impact of snakebite envenoming on domestic animals? A nation-wide community-based study in Nepal and Cameroon.

Authors:  Isabelle Bolon; Sara Babo Martins; Carlos Ochoa; Gabriel Alcoba; María Herrera; Henri Magloire Bofia Boyogueno; Barun Kumar Sharma; Manish Subedi; Bhupendra Shah; Franck Wanda; Sanjib Kumar Sharma; Armand Seraphin Nkwescheu; Nicolas Ray; François Chappuis; Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2021-06-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.