Literature DB >> 28122473

The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence.

Caroline de Moel-Mandel1, Julia M Shelley1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In Australia, about one in four pregnancies results in an induced abortion. The termination of a pregnancy is still, however, a criminal act in most jurisdictions, and access to abortion is not without barriers. This paper analyses existing access barriers and their implications.
METHODS: Databases and the grey literature were searched for publications that examined any legal and/or non-legal abortion access barrier applicable to Australia (2000-2016). Only those barriers that had been demonstrated to be the most restrictive were included and categorised.
RESULTS: From the initial 410 studies, only 20 publications were identified that matched the inclusion criteria. They indicated that access barriers do indeed exist in Australia. In many parts of Australia, abortion is only legal under strict conditions. Relatively strong evidence was found on the limited abortion access of rural women and of an imminent shortage in the provision of late abortions. For other barriers only limited research evidence existed, or merely opinions were expressed. Very few studies were undertaken to link barriers to outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Although this review can form a base for the national improvement of abortion access, the gap found in Australian research demonstrates a need for additional studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Australia; barriers; family planning services; reproductive health politics; service delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28122473     DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  7 in total

1.  Abortion Knowledge Among Advanced Practice Clinicians in Colorado.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Amy Alspaugh
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California.

Authors:  Nicole E Johns; Diana Greene Foster; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Medical termination of pregnancy service delivery in the context of decentralization: social and structural influences.

Authors:  Alana Hulme-Chambers; Samantha Clune; Jane Tomnay
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-11-21

4.  Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Courtney Devane; Regina M Renner; Sarah Munro; Édith Guilbert; Sheila Dunn; Marie-Soleil Wagner; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-11-08

5.  Barriers to responding to reproductive coercion and abuse among women presenting to Australian primary care.

Authors:  Molly Wellington; Kelsey Hegarty; Laura Tarzia
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Views and practice of abortion among Queensland midwives and sexual health nurses.

Authors:  Aakanksha Desai; Belinda Maier; Janelle James-McAlpine; Daniel Prentice; Caroline de Costa
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.884

7.  Dutch GPs' views on prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Julia Eap Schellekens; Claire Se Houtvast; Peter Leusink; Gunilla Kleiverda; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.