OBJECTIVE: To analyze macroscopic, microscopic, and ultrastructural aspects of enamel from head-and-neck cancer patients submitted to radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty sound extracted permanent molars were used and divided into 2 groups. The experimental group consisted of 10 molars from head-and-neck cancer patients submitted to radiotherapy with total doses that ranged from 50 to 70 Gy. Ten molars from patients who did not receive radiotherapy were matched with experimental-group samples by anatomic tooth group and comprised the control group. To perform a macroscopic analysis, standardized photos of different enamel faces were taken with a camera. Teeth were subjected to longitudinal cuts and hand polished to a final thickness of 0.1 mm. Enamel was analyzed under polarized light microscopy, and optical retardation values of birefringence were calculated in cervical, cusp, and occlusal pit areas. Subsequently, the same enamel areas were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Data from optical retardation values were statistically analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Fisher's test (α < 0.05). RESULTS: No macroscopic differences were observed between the irradiated and control groups. Polarized light microscopy analysis revealed that cervical enamel exhibited darker areas characterized by discrete birefringence patterns compared to the control enamel. Optical retardation values were only significantly different in the cervical enamel of the irradiated and control groups (p < 0.0001). Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed more evident interprismatic spaces in the cervical and outer cusp enamel of irradiated samples. CONCLUSIONS: Head-and-neck radiotherapy reduced optical retardation values of birefringence in cervical enamel, and the interprismatic spaces became more evident.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze macroscopic, microscopic, and ultrastructural aspects of enamel from head-and-neck cancerpatients submitted to radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty sound extracted permanent molars were used and divided into 2 groups. The experimental group consisted of 10 molars from head-and-neck cancerpatients submitted to radiotherapy with total doses that ranged from 50 to 70 Gy. Ten molars from patients who did not receive radiotherapy were matched with experimental-group samples by anatomic tooth group and comprised the control group. To perform a macroscopic analysis, standardized photos of different enamel faces were taken with a camera. Teeth were subjected to longitudinal cuts and hand polished to a final thickness of 0.1 mm. Enamel was analyzed under polarized light microscopy, and optical retardation values of birefringence were calculated in cervical, cusp, and occlusal pit areas. Subsequently, the same enamel areas were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Data from optical retardation values were statistically analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Fisher's test (α < 0.05). RESULTS: No macroscopic differences were observed between the irradiated and control groups. Polarized light microscopy analysis revealed that cervical enamel exhibited darker areas characterized by discrete birefringence patterns compared to the control enamel. Optical retardation values were only significantly different in the cervical enamel of the irradiated and control groups (p < 0.0001). Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed more evident interprismatic spaces in the cervical and outer cusp enamel of irradiated samples. CONCLUSIONS: Head-and-neck radiotherapy reduced optical retardation values of birefringence in cervical enamel, and the interprismatic spaces became more evident.
Authors: Mariana de Pauli Paglioni; Natalia Rangel Palmier; Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro; Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião; Thaís Bianca Brandão; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Cesar Augusto Migliorati; Alan Roger Santos-Silva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Velo; Ana Laura Herrera Farha; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; Aymée Shiota; Simone Zuquerato Sansavino; Ana Tarsila Souza; Heitor Marques Honório; Linda Wang Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Jullyana Mayara P Dezanetti; Bruna Luiza Nascimento; Juliana S R Orsi; Evelise M Souza Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Juliana Arid; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb; Harley Francisco de Oliveira; Paulo Nelson-Filho; Fabricio Kitazono de Carvalho; Lea Assed Bezerra da Silva; Talitha de Siqueira Mellara; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Juliana Jendiroba Faraoni; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Reyna Aguilar Quispe; Adrielle Lindolpho Cremonesi; Jeanne Kelly Gonçalves; Cassia Maria Fischer Rubira; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2018-08-06