Nihar R Desai1, Robert P Giugliano2, Scott M Wasserman3, John P Gibbs3, Thomas Liu3, Rob Scott4, Marc S Sabatine2. 1. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut2Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health Services Corporation, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California. 4. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California5currently with AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
Importance: Levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) vary markedly across the population and are influenced by genetic and nongenetic factors. Evolocumab is a fully human, monoclonal antibody against PCSK9 that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 55% to 75%. Whether the efficacy of evolocumab varies based on an individual's baseline PCSK9 level remains unknown. Objective: To characterize variability in PCSK9 levels and determine whether the LDL-C level reduction achieved with evolocumab differs based on PCSK9 levels. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study included pooled data from 3016 patients from 4 phase 3 randomized clinical trials ofevolocumab as part of the Program to Reduce LDL-C and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Inhibition of PCSK9 in Different Populations. Circulating PCSK9 levels were measured at baseline using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and used to stratify patients into quartiles, and LDL-C level was measured at baseline and weeks 10 and 12. In an additional 138 patients enrolled in a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic substudy from 4 phase 2 trials, circulating PCSK9 levels were measured at baseline and then weekly at weeks 8 through 12. Main Outcomes and Measures: Placebo-controlled percentage change in LDL-C level with evolocumab, 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly, across quartiles of baseline PCSK9 levels. Results: Of the 3016 patients, 1492 (49.5%) were female and 2758 (91.4%) were white. The median baselinecirculating PCSK9 level was 323 ng/mL (interquartile range, 258-406 ng/mL). Patients with higher levels of PCSK9 were more likely to be receiving intensive statin therapy (56%, 36%, 25%, and 13% in the fourth through first quartiles; P < .001) and had significantly lower baseline LDL-C level (123 mg/dL, 124 mg/dL, 128 mg/dL, and 137 mg/dL in the fourth through first quartiles; P < .001). After stratifying by statin use, there was no correlation between PCSK9 levels and LDL-C levels (ρ = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.10] for nonstatin users, P = .39, and ρ = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.08] for statin users, P = .12). Across all quartiles of baseline PCSK9 levels, both evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly suppressed circulating PCSK9 levels by 90% to 100% within 1 week of administration. Both evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly were associated with significant reductions in LDL-C levels between 64% and 71% (P < .001), regardless of PCSK9 levels (P for interaction = .76 and .21, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Regardless of baseline PCSK9 levels, the doses of evolocumab being studied in a large cardiovascular outcomes trial suppress PCSK9 levels and consistently and substantially reduce LDL-C levels.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) vary markedly across the population and are influenced by genetic and nongenetic factors. Evolocumab is a fully human, monoclonal antibody against PCSK9 that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 55% to 75%. Whether the efficacy of evolocumab varies based on an individual's baseline PCSK9 level remains unknown. Objective: To characterize variability in PCSK9 levels and determine whether the LDL-C level reduction achieved with evolocumab differs based on PCSK9 levels. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study included pooled data from 3016 patients from 4 phase 3 randomized clinical trials of evolocumab as part of the Program to Reduce LDL-C and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Inhibition of PCSK9 in Different Populations. Circulating PCSK9 levels were measured at baseline using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and used to stratify patients into quartiles, and LDL-C level was measured at baseline and weeks 10 and 12. In an additional 138 patients enrolled in a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic substudy from 4 phase 2 trials, circulating PCSK9 levels were measured at baseline and then weekly at weeks 8 through 12. Main Outcomes and Measures: Placebo-controlled percentage change in LDL-C level with evolocumab, 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly, across quartiles of baseline PCSK9 levels. Results: Of the 3016 patients, 1492 (49.5%) were female and 2758 (91.4%) were white. The median baseline circulating PCSK9 level was 323 ng/mL (interquartile range, 258-406 ng/mL). Patients with higher levels of PCSK9 were more likely to be receiving intensive statin therapy (56%, 36%, 25%, and 13% in the fourth through first quartiles; P < .001) and had significantly lower baseline LDL-C level (123 mg/dL, 124 mg/dL, 128 mg/dL, and 137 mg/dL in the fourth through first quartiles; P < .001). After stratifying by statin use, there was no correlation between PCSK9 levels and LDL-C levels (ρ = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.10] for nonstatin users, P = .39, and ρ = 0.03 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.08] for statin users, P = .12). Across all quartiles of baseline PCSK9 levels, both evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly suppressed circulating PCSK9 levels by 90% to 100% within 1 week of administration. Both evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks and 420 mg once monthly were associated with significant reductions in LDL-C levels between 64% and 71% (P < .001), regardless of PCSK9 levels (P for interaction = .76 and .21, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Regardless of baseline PCSK9 levels, the doses of evolocumab being studied in a large cardiovascular outcomes trial suppress PCSK9 levels and consistently and substantially reduce LDL-C levels.
Authors: Zuhier Awan; Nabil G Seidah; Jean G MacFadyen; Suzanne Benjannet; Daniel I Chasman; Paul M Ridker; Jacques Genest Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Robert P Giugliano; Nihar R Desai; Payal Kohli; William J Rogers; Ransi Somaratne; Fannie Huang; Thomas Liu; Satishkumar Mohanavelu; Elaine B Hoffman; Shannon T McDonald; Timothy E Abrahamsen; Scott M Wasserman; Robert Scott; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael J Koren; Rob Scott; Jae B Kim; Beat Knusel; Thomas Liu; Lei Lei; Michael Bolognese; Scott M Wasserman Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dirk J Blom; Tomas Hala; Michael Bolognese; Michael J Lillestol; Phillip D Toth; Lesley Burgess; Richard Ceska; Eli Roth; Michael J Koren; Christie M Ballantyne; Maria Laura Monsalvo; Kate Tsirtsonis; Jae B Kim; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Evan A Stein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; Laurence Bessac; Lisa G Berdan; Deepak L Bhatt; Vera Bittner; Rafael Diaz; Shaun G Goodman; Corinne Hanotin; Robert A Harrington; J Wouter Jukema; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Angèle Moryusef; Robert Pordy; Matthew T Roe; Tyrus Rorick; William J Sasiela; Cheerag Shirodaria; Michael Szarek; Jean-François Tamby; Pierluigi Tricoci; Harvey White; Andreas Zeiher; Philippe Gabriel Steg Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Michael G Silverman; Brian A Ference; Kyungah Im; Stephen D Wiviott; Robert P Giugliano; Scott M Grundy; Eugene Braunwald; Marc S Sabatine Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Frederick J Raal; Evan A Stein; Robert Dufour; Traci Turner; Fernando Civeira; Lesley Burgess; Gisle Langslet; Russell Scott; Anders G Olsson; David Sullivan; G Kees Hovingh; Bertrand Cariou; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Ransi Somaratne; Ian Bridges; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Daniel Gaudet Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael J Koren; Pernille Lundqvist; Michael Bolognese; Joel M Neutel; Maria Laura Monsalvo; Jingyuan Yang; Jae B Kim; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Harold Bays Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Naif A M Almontashiri; Ragnar O Vilmundarson; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Sonny Dandona; Robert Roberts; Arshed A Quyyumi; Hsiao-Huei Chen; Alexandre F R Stewart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Markella V Zanni; Lauren A Stone; Mabel Toribio; Dodie E Rimmelin; Jake Robinson; Tricia H Burdo; Kenneth Williams; Kathleen V Fitch; Janet Lo; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Sreeneeranj Kasichayanula; Anita Grover; Maurice G Emery; Megan A Gibbs; Ransi Somaratne; Scott M Wasserman; John P Gibbs Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; Michael Szarek; Vera A Bittner; Deepak L Bhatt; Rafael Diaz; Shaun G Goodman; J Wouter Jukema; Megan Loy; Garen Manvelian; Robert Pordy; Harvey D White; Philippe Gabriel Steg Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 19.112