Literature DB >> 28122045

Negative Immune Regulator TIPE2 Promotes M2 Macrophage Differentiation through the Activation of PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway.

Ruiling Liu1, Tingting Fan2, Wenwen Geng2, Youhai H Chen3, Qingguo Ruan2, Cui Zhang1.   

Abstract

Macrophages play important roles in the regulation of the innate and adaptive immune responses. Classically activated macrophages and alternatively activated macrophages are the two major forms of macrophages and have opposing functionalities. Tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein 8-2 is expressed primarily by immune cells and negatively regulates type 1 innate and adaptive immune responses to maintain immune tolerance. While previous studies indicate that TIPE2 promotes M2 but inhibits M1 macrophage differentiation, the underlying molecular mechanism by which TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation remains unclear. Our current study shows that TIPE2-deficient bone-marrow cells are defective in IL-4 induced M2 macrophage differentiation in vitro. Mechanistic studies revealed that TIPE2 promotes phosphoinositide metabolism and the activation of the down-stream AKT signaling pathway, which in turn leads to the expression of markers specific for M2 macrophages. In addition, our results showed that Tipe2-deficiency does not affect the activation of the JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway that also plays an important role during M2 macrophage differentiation. Taken together, these results indicate that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation through the activation of PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, and may play an important role during the resolution of inflammation, parasite control, as well as tissue repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28122045      PMCID: PMC5266285          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Macrophages play important roles in the regulation of the immune response and are involved in health and disease [1, 2]. The main function of macrophages is to respond to pathogens and regulate the immune response through antigen presentation and cytokine production [3, 4]. Depending on the micro-environmental stimuli, macrophages can differentiate into classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2) [5]. Th1-related cytokines like IFN-γ/TNF-α, endogenous stress signals and exogenous stimuli such as LPS (lipopolysaccharides) and dsDNA will polarize macrophages towards an M1 phenotype. In contrast, Th2-related cytokines like IL-4/IL-13 and immunomodulatory cytokines IL-10/TGF-β will polarize macrophages towards an M2 phenotype [6, 7]. In addition, it has been reported that glucocorticoid hormones, apoptotic cells and immune complexes can also induce macrophages to an M2-like phenotype [8, 9]. M1 macrophages can secrete inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-18 and IL-23 [10-12]. They have also been shown to up-regulate the expression of the intracellular protein suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) [13, 14] and promote the production of NO from L-arginine through the activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [15, 16]. Although M1 macrophages play important roles in the promotion of Th1 responses and mediate resistance to pathogens, they have also been implicated in initiating and sustaining inflammation, and therefore can also be detrimental to health [17, 18]. M2 macrophages are able to secrete high amounts of immunomodulatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β and convert arginine metabolism to express ornithine and polyamine [19]. M2 macrophages possess anti-inflammatory functions and are able to promote tissue remodeling and repair, dampen inflammation, help in the clearance of parasites and enhance tumor progression [20-22]. Tumor necrosis factor-α induced protein-8-like 2 (TNFAIP8L2 or TIPE2) belongs to TNFAIP8 family and was identified to be over-expressed in mice with EAE (Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis) [23, 24]. Accumulating evidence suggests that TIPE2 is a negative regulator of innate and adaptive immune response [23]. TIPE2 is preferentially expressed in lymphoid tissues and Tipe2-deficient cells are hyper-responsive to Toll-like receptor (TLR) and T cell receptor (TCR) activation [23]. A previous study showed that TIPE2 is able to limit phagocytosis and oxidative burst in macrophages by binding to and blocking Rac GTPases [25]. Additionally, TIPE2 negatively regulates inflammation by switching arginine metabolism from nitric oxide synthase to arginase in macrophages [26]. Mechanistic studies revealed that TIPE2 may inhibit the activation of NF-κB and the phosphorylation of JNK and p38 following LPS challenge [23, 27], suggesting that TIPE2 may inhibit M1 macrophage differentiation. Recently Xu et al found that TIPE2 alleviates experimental Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) through induction of macrophage polarization to a M2 phenotype [28]. However, the underlying molecular mechanism that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the molecular mechanism that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation using Tipe2-deficient mice. Our study demonstrates that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation through the activation of Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signaling pathway.

Materials and Methods

1. Animals

8 to 11-week-old wild-type and Tipe2 mice in the C57BL/6 background were used in the experiments and kept under pathogen-free conditions at the animal core facility of the Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All efforts were made to minimize the number of mice used and to prevent animal distress, pain, and injury. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was used for euthanasia of mice. All procedures were preapproved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Permit Number: SIAT-IRB-130306-A0000).

2. Preparation of bone marrow-derived macrophages

Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) were generated from femoral and tibial bone marrow cells as previously described [25]. Briefly, 3x106/mL bone marrow precursors from WT and Tipe2 mice were seeded in complete RPMI1640 culture medium supplemented with 20% L929 culture supernatant in 10cm plates. Half of the medium was replaced with fresh medium on days 4. On day 7, macrophages were about 95% F480+ as determined by flow cytometry and ready for further experiments.

3. RNA isolation and real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). RNA samples were reversely transcribed with prime script Rtreagent kit (Takara). Real-time quantitative PCR analysis was performed using specific primers for mouse Fabp4 (F, 5'- GCTTGTCTCCAGTGAAAACTTC-3'; R, 5'-GTCGTCTGCGGTGATTTCATC-3'),Ym1(F, 5'-AGAAGGGAGTTTCAAACCT-3'; R, 5'-ATCTGACGGTTCTGAGGAG-3'), Atgl, Mgl-1, Mgl-2, Arg-1, iNOS, Fizz-1 and Cd36 [29] in an Applied Biosystems 7500 system using THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO). Relative levels of gene expression were determined using GAPDH [30] as the control.

4. Cytokine assay

For cytokine assays, BMM were cultured in medium without L929 culture supernatant for 24 hours. Cells were then either untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50ng/ml, PeproTech) plus LPS (10 ng/mL, eBioscience) (M1) or IL-4 (10ng/ml, PeproTech) (M2). Culture supernatants were collected 24 h (for IL-12) and 48 h (for IL-10) later; Cytokine concentration was determined by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) per manufacturer’s recommendations (ebioscience).

5. Urea and NO detection

The samples were collected as described above. NO levels in culture supernatant and urea levels in total protein extracts were determined with the use of commercial kits (from BioAssay Systems for urea detection and from Beyotime Biotechnology for NO detection, respectively) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

6. Intracellular staining

For intracellular staining, BMM were cultured in medium without L929 culture supernatant for 24 hours. Cells were then either untreated or treated with IL-4 (10ng/ml, PeproTech) for 20 min. After wash twice with PBS+2%FBS, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with perm buffer (Biolegend) for 10 min and incubated for 60 min with a 1:100 dilution of Phospho-AKT (T308) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), Phospho-PDK1 (Ser241) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) or Phospho-STAT6 (Tyr641) antibody (Millipore). Cells were washed three times and incubated for 30 min in 1:1000 diluted DyLight™ 488 Donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Biolegend) in perm buffer. Stained cells were then washed and analyzed on CytoFLEX flow cytometry system (Beckman Coulter, Inc). Data were analyzed with the FlowJo software.

7. Immunoblotting

Protein extracts from macrophages were spotted onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was then blocked using 5% nonfat milk in TBS-T, and incubated with 1:200 diluted rabbit anti-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) (Echelon), rabbit anti-Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) (Echelon) or 1:4000 diluted mouse anti-ß-actin (Sigma) for 60 min at room temperature. After wash with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with the secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgM (1:2000, for PIP2 and PIP3, Abcam) or anti-mouse IgG (1:4000, for ß-actin, Santa Cruz) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then washed with TBS-T and signals were detected by chemiluminescence (Thermo scientific) and quantified by densitometry using ImageJ software. Relative levels of expression were determined using β-actin as the control.

8. Statistical analysis

The significance of the differences of the level of cytokines, urea and NO, proteins, lipids, and mRNA was determined by Student t test.

Results

1. TIPE2 promotes M2 but inhibits M1 macrophage differentiation

In order to explore the role of TIPE2 in macrophage differentiation, bone marrow derived macrophages (BMM) from wild-type and Tipe2-deficient mice were treated with either IFN-γ plus LPS to induce M1 macrophages or IL-4 to induce M2 macrophages. Our results revealed that under M1 macrophage-inducing condition, TIPE2-deficient macrophages produced more iNOS mRNA (Fig 1A). Consistent with this result, the NO production in the culture supernatant of Tipe2-deficient macrophages was significantly increased (Fig 1B). IL-12 is an important inflammatory cytokine secreted by M1 macrophages. Our results showed that Tipe2-deficient macrophages produced more IL-12 than WT macrophages under M1 macrophage-inducing condition (Fig 1C). However, when macrophages were treated with M2 macrophage-inducing condition, Tipe2-deficient macrophages produced less Arg-1 mRNA (Fig 1D) and urea (Fig 1E). In addition, we found that the production of IL-10, an important cytokine secreted by M2 macrophages, was significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages (Fig 1F). Taken together, these results demonstrate that TIPE2 promotes M2 but inhibits M1 macrophage differentiation in vitro.
Fig 1

TIPE2 promotes M2 but inhibits M1 macrophage differentiation.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. (A, B & C) To detect the expression of markers specific for M1 macrophages, mRNA level of iNOS was examined by real-time RT-PCR (A). The production of NO (B) and IL-12 (C) in the culture supernatant were examined by a commercial NO detection kit and ELISA, respectively. (D, E & F) To detect the expression of markers specific for M2 macrophages, mRNA level of Arg-1 was examined by real-time RT-PCR (D). The amount of urea in the protein extract was examined by a commercial urea detection kit (E) and the production of IL-10 in the culture supernatant was examined by ELISA (F). For A and D, data shown are fold increase over the group with the lowest expression level. For all figures, data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

TIPE2 promotes M2 but inhibits M1 macrophage differentiation.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. (A, B & C) To detect the expression of markers specific for M1 macrophages, mRNA level of iNOS was examined by real-time RT-PCR (A). The production of NO (B) and IL-12 (C) in the culture supernatant were examined by a commercial NO detection kit and ELISA, respectively. (D, E & F) To detect the expression of markers specific for M2 macrophages, mRNA level of Arg-1 was examined by real-time RT-PCR (D). The amount of urea in the protein extract was examined by a commercial urea detection kit (E) and the production of IL-10 in the culture supernatant was examined by ELISA (F). For A and D, data shown are fold increase over the group with the lowest expression level. For all figures, data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

2. TIPE2 promotes AKT but does not affect STAT6 signaling pathway

Because both AKT and STAT6 signaling pathways are important for M2 macrophage differentiation, next we examined whether TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation by regulating these two signaling pathways. Our results showed that Tipe2-deficient macrophages had a significant decrease in AKT (Fig 2A and 2B) phosphorylation after treatment with IL-4. We also found that the phosphorylation of Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1), a molecule that directly phosphorylates AKT at T308, was also decreased (Fig 2C and 2D). In contrast, STAT6 phosphorylation was comparable between WT and Tipe2-deficient macrophages (Fig 2E and 2F). These results indicate that TIPE2 may promote the differentiation of M2 macrophages by enhancing the phosphorylation of PDK1 and AKT.
Fig 2

Activation of PI3K-AKT but not JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway is defective in Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were either untreated (UT) or treated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (T) for 20 min. (A) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-AKT (T308) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) The MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) was determined using FlowJo software. (C) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-PDK1 (Ser241) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) The MFI of phosphorylated PDK1 (pPDK1) was determined using the same method as shown in (B). (E) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-STAT6 (Tyr641) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (F) The MFI of phosphorylated STAT6 (pSTAT6) was determined using the same method as shown in (B). Results are representative of three independent experiments. For B, D and F, Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. * p<0.05.

Activation of PI3K-AKT but not JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway is defective in Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were either untreated (UT) or treated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (T) for 20 min. (A) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-AKT (T308) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) The MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) was determined using FlowJo software. (C) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-PDK1 (Ser241) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) The MFI of phosphorylated PDK1 (pPDK1) was determined using the same method as shown in (B). (E) Cells were stained with anti-Phospho-STAT6 (Tyr641) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (F) The MFI of phosphorylated STAT6 (pSTAT6) was determined using the same method as shown in (B). Results are representative of three independent experiments. For B, D and F, Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. * p<0.05. To further confirm that TIPE2 promotes the activation of AKT signaling pathway but does not affect STAT6 signaling pathway, we examined the expression of key M2 macrophage markers that were regulated by these two signaling pathways, respectively. Our results showed that expression levels of key M2 markers regulated by AKT signaling pathway such as Arg1, Fizz1, Mgl1, Mgl2 and Ym1 were significantly reduced by Tipe2-deficient macrophages under M2 macrophage differentiation condition (Fig 3). However, expression levels of key M2 markers regulated by STAT6 signaling pathway such as Fabp4, Cd36 and Atgl were either not affected or increased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages (Fig 4). It is worth noting that expression of Arg1 and Fizz1 could be regulated by both signaling pathways. Taken together, these results are consistent with our finding that TIPE2 promotes the activation of AKT but does not affect STAT6 signaling pathway.
Fig 3

Expression levels of M2 macrophage markers regulated by PI3K-AKT signaling pathway are significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. Expression levels of Fizz1 (A), Ym1 (B), Mgl-1 (C) and Mgl-2 (D) were determined by real time RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

Fig 4

Expression levels of M2 macrophage markers regulated by JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway are either increased or not affected by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bo Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. Expression levels of Atgl (A), Fabp4 (B) and Cd36 (C) were determined by RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05.

Expression levels of M2 macrophage markers regulated by PI3K-AKT signaling pathway are significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. Expression levels of Fizz1 (A), Ym1 (B), Mgl-1 (C) and Mgl-2 (D) were determined by real time RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

Expression levels of M2 macrophage markers regulated by JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway are either increased or not affected by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bo Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were untreated (M0), treated with IFN-γ (50 ng/ml) and LPS (10 ng/ml) (M1) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (M2) for 24 h. Expression levels of Atgl (A), Fabp4 (B) and Cd36 (C) were determined by RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05.

3. TIPE2 promotes phosphoinositide metabolism

Although we have shown that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation by enhancing the phosphorylation of PDK1 and AKT, how TIPE2 regulates this process remains unclear. Because both PDK1 and AKT are downstream molecules of second messenger PIP3, which was generated through PI3K activation, we next examined whether phosphoinositide metabolism was affected by TIPE2 deficiency. Our results showed that cellular levels of PIP2 (Fig 5A and 5B) and PIP3 (Fig 5C and 5D) were significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages after IL-4 treatment. In addition, we found that PI3K blockade suppressed M2 macrophage differentiation and reduced the difference of Arg-1 expression between WT and Tipe2-deficient M2 macrophages (Fig 6). These results indicate that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation through the activation of PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Interestingly, while cellular levels of PIP2 and PIP3 were still significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages under M1 macrophage-inducing condition (S1 Fig), the phosphorylation of AKT is comparable between WT and Tipe2-deficient cells (S2 Fig).
Fig 5

Cellular levels of PIP2 and PIP3 were significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were treated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) for 20 min. (A) Cellular level of PIP2 was estimated by dot blot with anti-PIP2 antibody. (B) Relative expression level of PIP2 was determined using β-actin as the control and quantified by densitometry using ImageJ software. (C) Cellular level of PIP3 was estimated by dot blot with anti-PIP3 antibody. (D) Relative expression level of PIP3 was determined using same method as shown in (B). For A and C, results are representative of three independent experiments. For B and D, data shown are mean±SD for cells from three independent experiments. ** p<0.01.

Fig 6

Inhibition of PI3K reduces the difference of Arg-1 expression between WT and Tipe2-deficient M2 macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were treated with or without PI3K inhibitor NSC23766 (10 μM) for 30 min before stimulated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. Expression level of Arg-1 was determined by real time RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05.

Cellular levels of PIP2 and PIP3 were significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were treated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) for 20 min. (A) Cellular level of PIP2 was estimated by dot blot with anti-PIP2 antibody. (B) Relative expression level of PIP2 was determined using β-actin as the control and quantified by densitometry using ImageJ software. (C) Cellular level of PIP3 was estimated by dot blot with anti-PIP3 antibody. (D) Relative expression level of PIP3 was determined using same method as shown in (B). For A and C, results are representative of three independent experiments. For B and D, data shown are mean±SD for cells from three independent experiments. ** p<0.01.

Inhibition of PI3K reduces the difference of Arg-1 expression between WT and Tipe2-deficient M2 macrophages.

Bone marrow derived macrophages from WT and Tipe2-deficient mice (n = 3) were treated with or without PI3K inhibitor NSC23766 (10 μM) for 30 min before stimulated with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. Expression level of Arg-1 was determined by real time RT-PCR and normalized to the expression level of GAPDH. Data shown are mean±SD of one representative experiment. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. * p<0.05. TIPE3 is another TIPE protein family member. It has been reported that TIPE3 is essential for the activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway. This prompted us to examine whether TIPE3 also contributes positively to M2 macrophage polarization. However, we found that expression level of TIPE3 in M0, M1 and M2 macrophages is extremely low compared to that in intestine (S3 Fig). This result is consistent with published data that TIPE3 expression is barely detectable in macrophage cell line RAW264.7 [31].

Discussion

Previously it has been shown that TIPE2 is a negative regulator of type 1 innate and adaptive immune response [23]. Following LPS challenge, TIPE2 negatively regulates inflammation by switching arginine metabolism from nitric oxide synthase to arginase in macrophages [26]. These results indicate that TIPE2 may play an important role during macrophage differentiation. Depending on the microenvironment stimuli, macrophages can differentiate into M1 or M2 macrophages in vivo [32]. In vitro, M1 macrophages can also be induced by IFN-γ and LPS while M2 macrophages can be induced by Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13 [33]. Those in vitro induced macrophages have been widely used to study the function of macrophages since they share the same phenotype and function as in vivo polarized macrophages. Our results showed that TIPE2 inhibits IFN-γ and LPS induced M1 macrophage differentiation in vitro. This could be due to the inhibition of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathway by TIPE2 based on published data [23]. Furthermore, we found that Tipe2-deficient bone-marrow cells are defective in IL-4-induced M2 macrophage differentiation in vitro, which is consistent with a recently published paper showing that TIPE2 overexpression induced macrophage polarization to a M2 phenotype [28]. However, the underlying molecular mechanism that TIPE2 promotes M2 macrophage differentiation remains unclear. Stimulation of macrophages with IL-4 leads to the activation of the transcription factor STAT6, which is important for M2 macrophage polarization [34-36]. In addition, PI3K-AKT signaling pathway is activated by the IL-4 treatment in parallel to the JAK-STAT6 pathway and attenuated AKT signaling underlies aberrant M2 macrophage polarization [29, 37, 38]. Recently it has been shown that the PI3K signaling pathway could suppress M1 macrophage differentiation and enhances the M2 phenotype through its downstream molecule miR-21 [39]. Thus, TIPE2 could directly regulate molecules that are involved in M2 macrophage differentiation. Alternatively, because M1 macrophage activation may reciprocally inhibit M2 macrophage differentiation, TIPE2 could promote M2 macrophage differentiation indirectly through the inhibition of M1 macrophage differentiation. In order to investigate whether TIPE2 regulates M2 macrophage differentiation directly, we examined the activation of both PI3K and JAK-STAT6 signaling pathways, which have been shown before to be important for M2 macrophage differentiation. Our study revealed that TIPE2 promotes the activation of PI3K-AKT but does not affect JAK-STAT6 signaling pathway. The PI3K family of proteins plays an important role in cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, and glucose transportation [40-43]. Second messenger PIP3, which is generated through PI3K activation in the plasma membrane, can bind PH-domain containing proteins such as AKT and PDK1 and promote the phosphorylation of AKT directly or through PDK1 [44]. Previous study has revealed that all TIPE family proteins including TIPE2 contain a highly conserved TIPE2 homology (TH) domain capable of binding phosphoinositides [31]. Furthermore, TIPE3, another TIPE protein family member, binds to phosphoinositides through its TH domain, which is essential for the activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway [31]. These results prompted us to test the hypothesis that TIPE2 may promote the activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway through enhancing PIP3 signaling. Our study showed that TIPE2 is indeed required for PI3K-mediated phosphoinositide metabolism. However, it is not known how TIPE2 promotes this process. We hypothesize that TIPE2 may regulate the distribution of lipid second messengers in response to stimuli. Alternatively, TIPE2 may also function as a lipid-presenting protein to enhance the activity of PI3K. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms that promote phosphoinositide metabolism by TIPE2. Both TIPE2 and TIPE3 can bind phosphoinositide and promote the activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway. However, unlike TIPE3, TIPE2 can also interact with Caspase 8, Rac1 and Rgl/RalGDS and negatively regulates their function [23, 25, 45, 46]. Therefore, TIPE2 appears to be able to function as both a negative and a positive regulator depending on the cell types and conditions. Activation of AKT can be mediated by both Ral GTPases (non-canonical activation) and PI3K (canonical activation). Generation of PIP3 by PI3K at the membrane is essential for canonical AKT activation [47]. By contrast, the non-canonical AKT activation requires the activation of PDK1 by RalGDS, and this in turn leads to increased phosphorylation of AKT [48]. We hypothesize that, while activation of AKT can be mediated by both RalGDS and PI3K in M1 macrophage, activation of AKT was mainly mediated by PI3K in M2 macrophage. Because it has been reported that TIPE2 inhibits Ral-induced activation of AKT [46], TIPE2 appears to be able to function as both a negative and a positive regulator of AKT activation in M1 macrophage.

Conclusion

TIPE family member TIPE2 can promote the activation of PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, which leads to enhanced M2 macrophage differentiation. Thus, the importance of TIPE2 in controlling type 1 inflammation may result from its role in switching macrophage differentiation from classically activated M1 macrophages to alternatively activated M2 macrophages.

Cellular levels of PIP2 and PIP3 were significantly decreased by Tipe2-deficient macrophages under M1 macrophage-inducing condition.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Phosphorylation of AKT is comparable between WT and Tipe2-deficient M1 macrophage.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

TIPE3 expression is barely detectable in macrophages.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas.

Authors:  Antonio Sica; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Biochemical and functional characterization of three activated macrophage populations.

Authors:  Justin P Edwards; Xia Zhang; Kenneth A Frauwirth; David M Mosser
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 4.962

3.  Identification of a novel tumor necrosis factor-alpha-inducible gene, SCC-S2, containing the consensus sequence of a death effector domain of fas-associated death domain-like interleukin- 1beta-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein.

Authors:  D Kumar; T L Whiteside; U Kasid
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Colony stimulating factor-1 receptor signaling networks inhibit mouse macrophage inflammatory responses by induction of microRNA-21.

Authors:  Cristina I Caescu; Xingyi Guo; Lydia Tesfa; Tushar D Bhagat; Amit Verma; Deyou Zheng; E Richard Stanley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Tissue-specific expression of TIPE2 provides insights into its function.

Authors:  Guizhong Zhang; Chunyan Hao; Yunwei Lou; Wenjin Xi; Xuping Wang; Yan Wang; Zhonghua Qu; Chun Guo; Youhai Chen; Yun Zhang; Suxia Liu
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.407

6.  TIPE2, a negative regulator of innate and adaptive immunity that maintains immune homeostasis.

Authors:  Honghong Sun; Shunyou Gong; Ruaidhri J Carmody; Anja Hilliard; Li Li; Jing Sun; Li Kong; Lingyun Xu; Brendan Hilliard; Shimin Hu; Hao Shen; Xiaolu Yang; Youhai H Chen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Akt1-mediated regulation of macrophage polarization in a murine model of Staphylococcus aureus pulmonary infection.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Yanhua Kang; Hang Zhang; Zhenghao Piao; Hongping Yin; Ran Diao; Jingyan Xia; Liyun Shi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Analyzing classical and alternative macrophage activation in macrophage/neutrophil-specific IL-4 receptor-alpha-deficient mice.

Authors:  Frank Brombacher; Berenice Arendse; Reagon Peterson; Alexandra Hölscher; Christoph Hölscher
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

9.  TIPE2 Alleviates Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Through Regulating Macrophage Polarization.

Authors:  Feng Li; Xiaohua Zhu; Yongsheng Yang; Lan Huang; Jinhua Xu
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  The Role of the PI3K Signaling Pathway in CD4(+) T Cell Differentiation and Function.

Authors:  Jonathan M Han; Scott J Patterson; Megan K Levings
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  12 in total

1.  HSPA12B Secreted by Tumor-Associated Endothelial Cells Might Induce M2 Polarization of Macrophages via Activating PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling.

Authors:  Jingjie Zhou; Aiping Zhang; Liang Fan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Neuroprotective effects of low-dose G-CSF plus meloxicam in a rat model of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Pei-Kang Liu; Yao-Tseng Wen; Wei Lin; Kishan Kapupara; Minghong Tai; Rong-Kung Tsai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Human Cytomegalovirus Mediates Unique Monocyte-to-Macrophage Differentiation through the PI3K/SHIP1/Akt Signaling Network.

Authors:  Olesea Cojohari; Jamil Mahmud; Aaron M Altman; Megan A Peppenelli; Michael J Miller; Gary C Chan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Elevated Tumor Necrosis Factor-a-induced Protein 8-like 2 mRNA from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Na-Na Huang; Yan-Xin Zhao; Yan-Shuang Li; Dong Wang; Yu-Chen Fan; Xiao-Hong Li
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Hemozoin-induced activation of human monocytes toward M2-like phenotype is partially reversed by antimalarial drugs-chloroquine and artemisinin.

Authors:  Deepali Bobade; Ashwin V Khandare; Mangesh Deval; Padma Shastry; Prakash Deshpande
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The decreased expression of TIPE2 protein in the decidua of patients with missed abortion and possible significance.

Authors:  Yingshuo Sun; Xiaoyan Wang; Yue Li; Han Sun; Lu Wan; Xishuang Wang; Lining Zhang; Zhenghui Fang; Zengtao Wei
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  TIPE2 expression is increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Zhu Shi-Bai; Liu Rui-Min; Sun Ying-Chuan; Zhai Jie; Jiang Chao; Ye Can-Hua; Chen Xi; Qian Wen-Wei
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-23

8.  Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jianbo Feng; Haijuan Fu; Changhong Liu; Zhibin Yu; Yingnan Sun; Xiaoling She; Peiyao Li; Chunhua Zhao; Yang Liu; Tao Liu; Qiang Liu; Qing Liu; Guiyuan Li; Minghua Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  TIPE2 inhibits GC via regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and inflammation.

Authors:  Zhenhe Lin; Wenming Liu; Chuanxing Xiao; Yanyun Fan; Guohong Zhuang; Zhongquan Qi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  TIPE2 is a checkpoint of natural killer cell maturation and antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Jiacheng Bi; Chen Cheng; Chaoyue Zheng; Chen Huang; Xiaohu Zheng; Xiaochun Wan; Youhai H Chen; Zhigang Tian; Haoyu Sun
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.