Literature DB >> 28121853

The Impact of Two Operating Surgeons on Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Katie E Weichman1, Gretl Lam, Stelios C Wilson, Jamie P Levine, Robert J Allen, Nolan S Karp, Mihye Choi, Vishal D Thanik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of microsurgical breast reconstruction, there are many opportunities to improve both surgical efficiency and outcomes. The use of two operating surgeons has been employed, but the outcomes are unproven. In this study, the authors compare the outcomes of patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction with one operating surgeon to those with two surgeons.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction between July of 2011 and January of 2014 at a single academic institution was conducted. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those undergoing reconstruction with one surgeon and those having reconstruction with two surgeons. Once identified, patients were analyzed and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 157 patients underwent 248 microsurgical breast reconstructions during the study period. One hundred three patients (170 flaps) had two surgeons and 54 patients (78 flaps) had one surgeon. Patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral reconstructions with two surgeons had decreased mean operating room time by 60.1 minutes and 134 minutes (p < 0.001) and length of stay by 1.8 days and 1.3 days (p < 0.05), when compared to a single surgeon. Additionally, patients with one surgeon were more likely to have postoperative donor-site breakdown at 5.1 percent (n = 4) versus 0.6 percent (n = 1) (p = 0.0351).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of two operating surgeons has demonstrable effects on the outcomes of microsurgical breast reconstruction. The addition of a second surgeon significantly decreases operating room time and shortens hospital length of stay in both unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. It also significantly decreases donor-site wound healing complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28121853     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

1.  The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Hina J Panchal; Geoffrey E Hespe; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea Pusic; Babak Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.329

2.  The impact of a multispecialty operative team on colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective study from a would-be medical center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-I Chen; Fu-Cheng Chuang; Hung-Ju Li; Yu-Chi Chen; Hsin-Pao Chen; Kuang-Wen Liu; Yu-Chieh Su; Jian-Han Chen; Hui-Ming Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The impact of co-surgeons on complication rates and healthcare cost in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction: analysis of 8680 patients.

Authors:  Malke Asaad; Ying Xu; Carrie K Chu; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Alexander F Mericli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Exploring Plastic Surgeon Practice Patterns and Perspectives.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dean Shumway; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.