Literature DB >> 28121338

A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of catheter-directed interventions in submassive pulmonary embolism.

B-H Lou1, L-H Wang, Y Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed interventions, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), are becoming a popular therapeutic option for patients with hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism (PE) and right ventricle (RV) dysfunction (submassive PE). We wished to quantitatively assess therapeutic efficacy and safety of catheter-directed interventions in submassive PE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus were searched for studies on catheter-directed interventions and submassive PE. Studies reporting data on therapeutic efficacy (RV to left ventricle [RV/LV] ratio, systolic pulmonary artery pressure) and safety outcomes (in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates, major and minor bleeding rates) were retained and assessed.
RESULTS: The final reference sample included 13 publications (11 papers and 2 conference abstracts), collectively enrolling 422 patients with submassive PE. The majority (8/13) studies were retrospective studies. One study was a randomized controlled study. Nine of 13 studies utilized CDT with or without ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis. The post-therapy pooled mean change of RV/LV ratio was -0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.42, -0.18), and the pooled mean decrease of pulmonary artery pressure was -19.41 (95% CI: -27.65, -11.17) mm Hg. Safety outcome analysis demonstrated low pooled rates of adverse events (in-hospital mortality: 0.00 [95% CI: 0.00, 0.01]; 30-day mortality: 0.00 [95% CI: 0.00, 0.03]; major bleeding: 0.00 [95% CI: 0.00, 0.02]; minor bleeding: 0.05 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.12]).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates evidence of therapeutic efficacy and low rates of adverse events of catheter-directed interventions in submassive PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28121338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci        ISSN: 1128-3602            Impact factor:   3.507


  5 in total

Review 1.  Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Matthew A Chiarello; Akhilesh K Sista
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Catheter-Based Therapies Decrease Mortality in Patients With Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence From Meta-Analysis of 65,589 Patients.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Łukasz Szarpak; Michał Pruc; Tomasz Kopiec; Szymon Darocha; Marta Banaszkiewicz; Maciej Niewada; Marcin Grabowski; Marcin Kurzyna
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Rationale for catheter directed therapy in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sailen G Naidu; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; J Scott Kriegshauser; William G Eversman; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

4.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel; Ignacio Neumann; Walter Ageno; Rebecca Beyth; Nathan P Clark; Adam Cuker; Barbara A Hutten; Michael R Jaff; Veena Manja; Sam Schulman; Caitlin Thurston; Suresh Vedantham; Peter Verhamme; Daniel M Witt; Ivan D Florez; Ariel Izcovich; Robby Nieuwlaat; Stephanie Ross; Holger J Schünemann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Yuan Zhang; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. standard medical therapy in patients with acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Stephen D'Auria; Ahmet Sezer; Floyd Thoma; Michael Sharbaugh; Jeffrey McKibben; Robert Maholic; Efthymios D Avgerinos; Belinda N Rivera-Lebron; Catalin Toma
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.017

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.