Literature DB >> 28121184

A comparison of the health benefits of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) and moderate-intensity walking in type 2 diabetes patients.

José S Ruffino1, Preeyaphorn Songsorn1, Malindi Haggett1, Daniel Edmonds1, Anthony M Robinson2, Dylan Thompson1, Niels B J Vollaard1.   

Abstract

Reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) is a genuinely time-efficient intervention that can improve aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity in sedentary individuals. The present study compared the effects of REHIT and moderate-intensity walking on health markers in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a counter-balanced crossover study. Sixteen men with T2D (mean ± SD age: 55 ± 5 years, body mass index: 30.6 ± 2.8 kg·m-2, maximal aerobic capacity: 27 ± 4 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed 8 weeks of REHIT (three 10-min low-intensity cycling sessions/week with two "all-out" 10-20-s sprints) and 8 weeks of moderate-intensity walking (five 30-min sessions/week at an intensity corresponding to 40%-55% of heart-rate reserve), with a 2-month wash-out period between interventions. Before and after each intervention, participants underwent an incremental fitness test, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, and continuous glucose monitoring. REHIT was associated with a significantly larger increase in maximal aerobic capacity compared with walking (7% vs. 1%; time × intervention interaction effect: p < 0.05). Both REHIT and walking decreased resting mean arterial pressure (-4%; main effect of time: p < 0.05) and plasma fructosamine (-5%; main effect of time: p < 0.05). Neither intervention significantly improved OGTT-derived measures of insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control measured using continuous glucose monitors, blood lipid profile, or body composition. We conclude that REHIT is superior to a 5-fold larger volume of moderate-intensity walking in improving aerobic fitness, but similar to walking REHIT is not an effective intervention for improving insulin sensitivity or glycaemic control in T2D patients in the short term.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIT; V̇O2max; blood pressure; contrôle glycémique; entraînement par intervalle au sprint (« SIT »); glycaemic control; pression sanguine; sprint interval training (SIT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28121184     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  19 in total

1.  The Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachelle N Sultana; Angelo Sabag; Shelley E Keating; Nathan A Johnson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints.

Authors:  Niels B J Vollaard; Richard S Metcalfe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Chronic Effect of Interval Training on Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jenna Taylor; Shelley E Keating; David J Holland; Jeff S Coombes; Michael D Leveritt
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2018-04-01

4.  Extremely short duration interval exercise improves 24-h glycaemia in men with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Richard S Metcalfe; Ben Fitzpatrick; Sinead Fitzpatrick; Gary McDermott; Noel Brick; Conor McClean; Gareth W Davison
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  High-Intensity Interval Training Is Equivalent to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes of Glucose Control, Cardiometabolic Risk, and Microvascular Complication Markers in Men With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Shohn G Wormgoor; Lance C Dalleck; Caryn Zinn; Robert Borotkanics; Nigel K Harris
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Reduced Exertion High-Intensity Interval Training is More Effective at Improving Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Health than Traditional Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training.

Authors:  Tom F Cuddy; Joyce S Ramos; Lance C Dalleck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The effects of Pilates vs. aerobic training on cardiorespiratory fitness, isokinetic muscular strength, body composition, and functional tasks outcomes for individuals who are overweight/obese: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Angeles Bonal Rosell Rayes; Claudio Andre B de Lira; Ricardo B Viana; Ana A Benedito-Silva; Rodrigo L Vancini; Naryana Mascarin; Marilia S Andrade
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  High-intensity interval training for health benefits and care of cardiac diseases - The key to an efficient exercise protocol.

Authors:  Shigenori Ito
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-26

9.  High-intensity interval training changes mitochondrial respiratory capacity differently in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Tine L Dohlmann; Morten Hindsø; Flemming Dela; Jørn W Helge; Steen Larsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-09

10.  Glycemic Threshold as an Alternative Method to Identify the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Delevatti; Ana Carolina Kanitz; Cristine L Alberton; Elisa Corrêa Marson; Patricia Dias Pantoja; Carolina DertzbocherFeil Pinho; Salime Chedid Lisboa; Luiz Fernando M Kruel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.