N Mohamed1, M Y Wang2, J-C Le Huec3, U Liljenqvist4, I L Scully1, J Baber5, E Begier6, K U Jansen1, A Gurtman6, A S Anderson1. 1. Pfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York, USA. 2. Departments of Neurological Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. 3. Spine Unit 2, Surgical Research Laboratory, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France. 4. Department of Spine Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany. 5. Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research and Development, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research and Development, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of poor health outcomes, including mortality, across surgical specialties. Despite current advances as a result of preventive interventions, the disease burden of S. aureus SSI remains high, and increasing antibiotic resistance continues to be a concern. Prophylactic S. aureus vaccines may represent an opportunity to prevent SSI. METHODS: A review of SSI pathophysiology was undertaken in the context of evaluating new approaches to developing a prophylactic vaccine to prevent S. aureus SSI. RESULTS: A prophylactic vaccine ideally would provide protective immunity at the time of the surgical incision to prevent initiation and progression of infection. Although the pathogenicity of S. aureus is attributed to many virulence factors, previous attempts to develop S. aureus vaccines targeted only a single virulence mechanism. The field has now moved towards multiple-antigen vaccine strategies, and promising results have been observed in early-phase clinical studies that supported the recent initiation of an efficacy trial to prevent SSI. CONCLUSION: There is an unmet medical need for novel S. aureus SSI prevention measures. Advances in understanding of S. aureus SSI pathophysiology could lead to the development of effective and safe prophylactic multiple-antigen vaccines to prevent S. aureus SSI.
BACKGROUND:Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of poor health outcomes, including mortality, across surgical specialties. Despite current advances as a result of preventive interventions, the disease burden of S. aureus SSI remains high, and increasing antibiotic resistance continues to be a concern. Prophylactic S. aureus vaccines may represent an opportunity to prevent SSI. METHODS: A review of SSI pathophysiology was undertaken in the context of evaluating new approaches to developing a prophylactic vaccine to prevent S. aureus SSI. RESULTS: A prophylactic vaccine ideally would provide protective immunity at the time of the surgical incision to prevent initiation and progression of infection. Although the pathogenicity of S. aureus is attributed to many virulence factors, previous attempts to develop S. aureus vaccines targeted only a single virulence mechanism. The field has now moved towards multiple-antigen vaccine strategies, and promising results have been observed in early-phase clinical studies that supported the recent initiation of an efficacy trial to prevent SSI. CONCLUSION: There is an unmet medical need for novel S. aureus SSI prevention measures. Advances in understanding of S. aureus SSI pathophysiology could lead to the development of effective and safe prophylactic multiple-antigen vaccines to prevent S. aureus SSI.
Authors: Jörg Haupenthal; Yannik Kautz; Walid A M Elgaher; Linda Pätzold; Teresa Röhrig; Matthias W Laschke; Thomas Tschernig; Anna K H Hirsch; Vadim Molodtsov; Katsuhiko S Murakami; Rolf W Hartmann; Markus Bischoff Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Naglaa Mohamed; Yekaterina Timofeyeva; Dorota Jamrozy; Eduardo Rojas; Li Hao; Natalie C Silmon de Monerri; Julio Hawkins; Guy Singh; Bing Cai; Paul Liberator; Shite Sebastian; Robert G K Donald; Ingrid L Scully; C Hal Jones; C Buddy Creech; Isaac Thomsen; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; Kathrin U Jansen; Matthew T G Holden; Annaliesa S Anderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Megumi Inoue; Takuma Yonemura; James Baber; Yasuko Shoji; Masakazu Aizawa; David Cooper; Joseph Eiden; William C Gruber; Kathrin U Jansen; Annaliesa S Anderson; Alejandra Gurtman Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 3.452