Literature DB >> 28120794

The world's biomes and primary production as a triple tragedy of the commons foraging game played among plants.

Gordon G McNickle1, Miquel A Gonzalez-Meler2, Douglas J Lynch2, Jennifer L Baltzer3, Joel S Brown2.   

Abstract

Plants appear to produce an excess of leaves, stems and roots beyond what would provide the most efficient harvest of available resources. One way to understand this overproduction of tissues is that excess tissue production provides a competitive advantage. Game theoretic models predict overproduction of all tissues compared with non-game theoretic models because they explicitly account for this indirect competitive benefit. Here, we present a simple game theoretic model of plants simultaneously competing to harvest carbon and nitrogen. In the model, a plant's fitness is influenced by its own leaf, stem and root production, and the tissue production of others, which produces a triple tragedy of the commons. Our model predicts (i) absolute net primary production when compared with two independent global datasets; (ii) the allocation relationships to leaf, stem and root tissues in one dataset; (iii) the global distribution of biome types and the plant functional types found within each biome; and (iv) ecosystem responses to nitrogen or carbon fertilization. Our game theoretic approach removes the need to define allocation or vegetation type a priori but instead lets these emerge from the model as evolutionarily stable strategies. We believe this to be the simplest possible model that can describe plant production.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary game theory; foraging game; net primary productivity; tragedy of the commons game; vegetation game

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28120794      PMCID: PMC5124101          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

Review 1.  Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles.

Authors:  Oskar Franklin; Jacob Johansson; Roderick C Dewar; Ulf Dieckmann; Ross E McMurtrie; Ake Brännström; Ray Dybzinski
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Roots in space: a spatially explicit model for below-ground competition in plants.

Authors:  Erin E O'Brien; Joel S Brown; Jason D Moll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Focusing the metaphor: plant root foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Gordon G McNickle; Colleen Cassady St Clair; James F Cahill
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999.

Authors:  Ramakrishna R Nemani; Charles D Keeling; Hirofumi Hashimoto; William M Jolly; Stephen C Piper; Compton J Tucker; Ranga B Myneni; Steven W Running
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Allocation of gross primary production in forest ecosystems: allometric constraints and environmental responses.

Authors:  Guangshui Chen; Yusheng Yang; David Robinson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Evolutionarily stable strategy carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data.

Authors:  Ray Dybzinski; Caroline Farrior; Adam Wolf; Peter B Reich; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Game theory and plant ecology.

Authors:  Gordon G McNickle; Ray Dybzinski
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Direct and legacy effects of long-term elevated CO₂ on fine root growth and plant-insect interactions.

Authors:  Peter Stiling; Daniel Moon; Anthony Rossi; Rebecca Forkner; Bruce A Hungate; Frank P Day; Rachel E Schroeder; Bert Drake
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 9.  Is analysing the nitrogen use at the plant canopy level a matter of choosing the right optimization criterion?

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  New insights into carbon allocation by trees from the hypothesis that annual wood production is maximized.

Authors:  Ross E McMurtrie; Roderick C Dewar
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  3 in total

1.  When does mutualism offer a competitive advantage? A game-theoretic analysis of host-host competition in mutualism.

Authors:  Abdel H Halloway; Katy D Heath; Gordon G McNickle
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.138

2.  Root tragedy of the commons: Revisiting the mechanisms of a misunderstood theory.

Authors:  Ciro Cabal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Toleration games: compensatory growth by plants in response to enemy attack is an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Authors:  Gordon G McNickle; Wesley D Evans
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 3.276

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.