Literature DB >> 28120405

Non-animal models of wound healing in cutaneous repair: In silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of wounds and scars in human skin.

Sara Ud-Din1, Ardeshir Bayat1,2.   

Abstract

Tissue repair models are essential to explore the pathogenesis of wound healing and scar formation, identify new drug targets/biomarkers and to test new therapeutics. However, no animal model is an exact replicate of the clinical situation in man as in addition to differences in the healing of animal skin; the response to novel therapeutics can be variable when compared to human skin. The aim of this review is to evaluate currently available non-animal wound repair models in human skin, including: in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. The appropriate use of these models is extremely relevant to wound-healing research as it enables improved understanding of the basic mechanisms present in the wound healing cascade and aid in discovering better means to regulate them for enhanced healing or prevention of abnormal scarring. The advantage of in silico models is that they can be used as a first in virtue screening tool to predict the effect of a drug/stimulus on cells/tissues and help plan experimental research/clinical trial studies but remain theoretical until validated. In vitro models allow direct quantitative examination of an effect on specific cell types alone without incorporating other tissue-matrix components, which limits their utility. Ex vivo models enable immediate and short-term evaluation of a particular effect on cells and its surrounding tissue components compared with in vivo models that provide direct analysis of a stimulus in the living human subject before/during/after exposure to a stimulus. Despite clear advantages, there remains a lack of standardisation in design, evaluation and follow-up, for acute/chronic wounds and scars in all models. In conclusion, ideal models of wound healing research are desirable and should mimic not only the structure but also the cellular and molecular interactions, of wound types in human skin. Future models may also include organ/skin-on-a-chip with potential application in wound healing research.
© 2017 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28120405     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Northwestern Abdominoplasty Scar Model: A Tool for High-Throughput Assessment of Scar Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ji-Cheng Hsieh; Chitang J Joshi; Rou Wan; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Cell-specific expression of the transcriptional regulator RHAMM provides a timing mechanism that controls appropriate wound re-epithelialization.

Authors:  Cornelia Tolg; Muhan Liu; Katelyn Cousteils; Patrick Telmer; Khandakar Alam; Jenny Ma; Leslie Mendina; James B McCarthy; Vincent L Morris; Eva A Turley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Tracing skin aging process: a mini- review of in vitro approaches.

Authors:  Sophia Letsiou
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.277

4.  Watching the Internal Clock of Cells while They Move and Divide.

Authors:  Barry D Hughes
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Experimental Models to Study Skin Wound Healing with a Focus on Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Eberhard Grambow; Heiko Sorg; Christian G G Sorg; Daniel Strüder
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-25

6.  Morita-Baylis-Hillman adducts derived from thymol: synthesis, in silico studies and biological activity against Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  Francisco J S Xavier; Andressa B Lira; Gabriel C Verissimo; Fernanda S de S Saraiva; Abrahão A de Oliveira Filho; Elaine M de Souza-Fagundes; Margareth de F F M Diniz; Maria A Gomes; Aleff C Castro; Fábio P L Silva; Claudio G Lima-Junior; Mário L A A Vasconcellos
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 3.364

7.  A Novel Xenograft Model Demonstrates Human Fibroblast Behavior During Skin Wound Repair and Fibrosis.

Authors:  Mimi R Borrelli; Abra H Shen; Michelle Griffin; Shamik Mascharak; Sandeep Adem; Nestor M Diaz Deleon; Ledibabari Mildred Ngaage; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan; Hermann Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.947

8.  Simultaneous Delivery of Multiple Antimicrobial Agents by Biphasic Scaffolds for Effective Treatment of Wound Biofilms.

Authors:  Yajuan Su; Alec McCarthy; Shannon L Wong; Ronald R Hollins; Guangshun Wang; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 11.092

9.  Isopropyl Caffeate: A Caffeic Acid Derivative-Antioxidant Potential and Toxicity.

Authors:  Andressa Brito Lira; Camila de Albuquerque Montenegro; Kardilandia Mendes de Oliveira; Abrahão Alves de Oliveira Filho; Alexandre Rolim da Paz; Marianna Oliveira de Araújo; Damião Pergentino de Sousa; Cynthia Layse Ferreira de Almeida; Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva; Caliandra Maria Bezerra Luna Lima; Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz; Hilzeth de Luna Freire Pessôa
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Limited Treatment Options for Diabetic Wounds: Barriers to Clinical Translation Despite Therapeutic Success in Murine Models.

Authors:  May Barakat; Luisa A DiPietro; Lin Chen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.