T Geiser1, J Apel2, O Vicent3, J Büttner4. 1. Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau am Staffelsee, Deutschland. geiser@bgu-murnau.de. 2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Rettungs- und Schmerzmedizin, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St. Gallen, Schweiz. 3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Deutschland. 4. Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau am Staffelsee, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guided distal sciatic nerve block (DSB) at bifurcation level shows fast onset and provides excellent success rates. However, its safe performance might be difficult for the unexperienced physician. Just slightly distal to the bifurcation, the tibial nerve (TN) and common fibular nerve (CFN) can be shown clearly separated from each other. Therefore, we investigated if a block done here would provide similar quality results compared to the DSB proximally to the division, with a potentially lower risk of nerve damage. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective trial, 56 patients per group received either aDSB distal to the bifurcation "out-of-plane" (dist.) or proximally "in-plane" (prox.) with 30 ml of Mepivacaine 1% each. Success was tested by a blinded examiner after 15 and 30 min respectively (sensory and motor block of TN and CFN: 0 = none, 2 = complete, change of skin temperature). Videos of the blocks were inspected by an independent expert retrospectively with regard to the spread of the local anesthetic (LA) and accidental intraneural injection. RESULTS: Cumulative single nerve measurements and temperature changes revealed significant shorter onset and better efficacy (dist/prox: 15 min: 3.13 ± 1.86/1.82 ± 1.62; 30 min: 5.73 ± 1.92/3.21 ± 1.88; T15 min: 30.3 ± 3.48/28.0 ± 3.67, T30 min. 33.0 ± 2.46/30.6 ± 3.86; MV/SD; ANOVA; p < 0.01) combined with a higher rate of subparaneural spread in the dist. group (41/51 vs.12/53; χ2; p < 0,01). Procedure times were similar. There were no complications in either group. DISCUSSION: The subparaneural spread of the LA turned out to be crucial for better results in the distal group. The steep angle using the out-of-plane approach favors needle penetration through the paraneural sheath. The distance between the branches allows the safe application of the LA, so an effective block can be done with just one injection. CONCLUSION: DSB slightly distal to the bifurcation, in an out-of-plane technique between the TN and CFN, can be done fast, effectively and safe.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guided distal sciatic nerve block (DSB) at bifurcation level shows fast onset and provides excellent success rates. However, its safe performance might be difficult for the unexperienced physician. Just slightly distal to the bifurcation, the tibial nerve (TN) and common fibular nerve (CFN) can be shown clearly separated from each other. Therefore, we investigated if a block done here would provide similar quality results compared to the DSB proximally to the division, with a potentially lower risk of nerve damage. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective trial, 56 patients per group received either a DSB distal to the bifurcation "out-of-plane" (dist.) or proximally "in-plane" (prox.) with 30 ml of Mepivacaine 1% each. Success was tested by a blinded examiner after 15 and 30 min respectively (sensory and motor block of TN and CFN: 0 = none, 2 = complete, change of skin temperature). Videos of the blocks were inspected by an independent expert retrospectively with regard to the spread of the local anesthetic (LA) and accidental intraneural injection. RESULTS: Cumulative single nerve measurements and temperature changes revealed significant shorter onset and better efficacy (dist/prox: 15 min: 3.13 ± 1.86/1.82 ± 1.62; 30 min: 5.73 ± 1.92/3.21 ± 1.88; T15 min: 30.3 ± 3.48/28.0 ± 3.67, T30 min. 33.0 ± 2.46/30.6 ± 3.86; MV/SD; ANOVA; p < 0.01) combined with a higher rate of subparaneural spread in the dist. group (41/51 vs.12/53; χ2; p < 0,01). Procedure times were similar. There were no complications in either group. DISCUSSION: The subparaneural spread of the LA turned out to be crucial for better results in the distal group. The steep angle using the out-of-plane approach favors needle penetration through the paraneural sheath. The distance between the branches allows the safe application of the LA, so an effective block can be done with just one injection. CONCLUSION: DSB slightly distal to the bifurcation, in an out-of-plane technique between the TN and CFN, can be done fast, effectively and safe.
Authors: Geneviève Germain; Simon Lévesque; Nicolas Dion; Marie-Josée Nadeau; Dany Coté; Pierre C Nicole; Alexis F Turgeon Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Robert Werdehausen; Sebastian Braun; Henning Hermanns; Rainer Freynhagen; Peter Lipfert; Markus F Stevens Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: De Q H Tran; Andrea P González; Francisca Bernucci; Kevin Pham; Roderick J Finlayson Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 5.108