| Literature DB >> 28119760 |
Qi Zeng1, Hui Xie1, Hongjin Song1, Fayu Nie1, Jiahua Wang1, Dan Chen1, Fu Wang1.
Abstract
Abrus cantoniensis (Leguminosae sp.) is a traditionally used remedy for treating rheumatism, blood stasis, and internal injuries. In order to reveal a new insight of the utilization of the plant, solvent extraction by ethyl acetate (EA) was performed in order to evaluate the plant extracts' in vivo excision and incision-wound potentials with models. The contents of the EA fraction, wound healing activity, acute oral toxicity, and acute dermal toxicity were studied. As a result, the main chemical constituents of the EA fraction were alkaloids, flavonoids, and steroids. The acute oral toxicity test results and assessment of skin hypoallergenicity showed that the plant extract was safe at LD50 as high as 5000 mg/kg. Both excision and incision model tests results indicated that the EA fraction of A. cantoniensis showed a significant wound healing capacity at a concentration of 5% (v/w) (p < 0.01) as observed by the increased wound contraction, decreased epithelialization time, and increased hydroxyproline content compared to the ones of the controls. The present study showed that the EA fraction of A. cantoniensis possesses potential wound healing activities and provided recent results for the use of A. cantoniensis for wound curing.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28119760 PMCID: PMC5227303 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6568528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Calibration curve of hydroxyproline specifically plotted for the EA fraction. The standard hydroxyproline solutions had the following concentrations: 7, 6, 5, 4, 2, and 0 μg/mL. The hydroxyproline content was determined by the method described by Leach [25] and using a UV-detection at 560 nm on a spectrophotometer.
Qualitative analysis of bioactive compounds in the EA fraction of A. cantoniensis.
| Alkaloids | Saponin | Flavanoids | Tannins | Steroids | Terpenoids | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA fraction | + | − | + | − | + | − |
Note: present (+); absent (−).
Effect of the EA fraction formulated in ointment on the percentage of wound contraction.
| Group | Treatment period (day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd | 4th | 6th | 8th | |
| 0.2 w/v nitrofurazone | 58.46 ± 12.05 | 74.62 ± 7.15 | 82.23 ± 7.25 | 92.73 ± 4.28 |
| 10% EA fraction | 47.38 ± 19.21 | 57.85 ± 14.85 | 71.08 ± 8.21 | 85.54 ± 7.00 |
| 5% EA fraction | 53.35 ± 8.12 | 66.14 ± 9.41 | 83.93 ± 9.16 | 94.48 ± 3.04 |
| Simple ointment | 44.04 ± 7.63 | 56.96 ± 5.58 | 70.71 ± 8.20 | 84.92 ± 5.84 |
Note: 0.01 < p < 0.05; p < 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of the EA fraction formulated in ointments on the percentage of wound contraction. The excision wound models were treated with 5% (w/v) and 10% (w/v) of the EA fraction. Negative control group and the blank group were treated with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone and simple ointment.
Figure 3Photograph of appearance of a healed excision wound: (a) day 0 and (b) day 10.
Effect of the EA fraction on the hydroxyproline content of the granulation tissue of the excision wound.
| Group ( | Hydroxyproline content ( |
|---|---|
| 0.2 w/v nitrofurazone | 7.448 ± 1.442 |
| 10% EA fraction | 3.562 ± 1.109 |
| 5% EA fraction | 6.264 ± 1.617 |
| Simple ointment | 3.766 ± 0.875 |
Note: p < 0.01.
Effect of EA fraction on the tensile strength.
| Group | Tensile strength (g) |
|---|---|
| 0.2 w/v nitrofurazone | 242.83 ± 59.82 |
| 10% EA fraction | 171.17 ± 23.30 |
| 5% EA fraction | 197.83 ± 46.01 |
| Simple ointment | 134.50 ± 26.37 |
Note: 0.01 < p < 0.05; p < 0.01.