Literature DB >> 28119691

Microglial CD206 Gene Has Potential as a State Marker of Bipolar Disorder.

Masahiro Ohgidani1, Takahiro A Kato2, Yoshinori Haraguchi3, Toshio Matsushima1, Yoshito Mizoguchi3, Toru Murakawa-Hirachi3, Noriaki Sagata1, Akira Monji3, Shigenobu Kanba1.   

Abstract

The pathophysiology of bipolar disorder, especially the underlying mechanisms of the bipolarity between manic and depressive states, has yet to be clarified. Microglia, immune cells in the brain, play important roles in the process of brain inflammation, and recent positron emission tomography studies have indicated microglial overactivation in the brain of patients with bipolar disorder. We have recently developed a technique to induced microglia-like (iMG) cells from peripheral blood (monocytes). We introduce a novel translational approach focusing on bipolar disorder using this iMG technique. We hypothesize that immunological conditional changes in microglia may contribute to the shift between manic and depressive states, and thus we herein analyzed gene profiling patterns of iMG cells from three patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder during both manic and depressive states, respectively. We revealed that the gene profiling patterns are different between manic and depressive states. The profiling pattern of case 1 showed that M1 microglia is dominant in the manic state compared to the depressive state. However, the patterns of cases 2 and 3 were not consistent with the pattern of case 1. CD206, a mannose receptor known as a typical M2 marker, was significantly downregulated in the manic state among all three patients. This is the first report to indicate the importance of shifting microglial M1/M2 characteristics, especially the CD206 gene expression pattern between depressive and manic states. Further translational studies are needed to dig up the microglial roles in the underlying biological mechanisms of bipolar disorder.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD206; M1/M2 polarization; bipolar disorder; induced microglia-like (iMG) cells; microglia; rapid cycling; state marker; translational research

Year:  2017        PMID: 28119691      PMCID: PMC5220016          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Bipolar Disorder and Microglia

The pathophysiology of bipolar disorder has yet to be well understood, while recent studies have indicated abnormal immunological functions may be a contributing factor (1, 2). Microglia, immune cells in the brain, play important roles in the process of brain inflammation, and recent positron emission tomography (PET) studies have shown microglial overactivation in the brain of patients with various psychiatric disorders including bipolar disorder (3–8). Based on the above evidence, microglia has been highlighted in the study of various psychiatric disorders to understand the underlying biological mechanisms (9–12). We have recently developed a technique to induced microglia-like (iMG) cells from peripheral blood (13) and are now confirming the utilities of this technique for psychiatric research (14, 15). The underlying mechanisms of the bipolarity between manic and depressive states have yet to be clarified. Immunological conditional changes in microglia may contribute to the manicdepressive shift in bipolar disorder. In the field of immunology, M1/M2 polarization is recognized as a useful marker of macrophages and related cells including microglia. Polarization pattern is well known to distinguish functional phenotypes: pro-inflammation (M1) and anti-inflammation (M2) (16, 17). Recently, M1/M2 polarization has been highlighted in the understanding of psychiatric disorders (18–20). However, there is no research analyzing M1/M2 polarization of microglia in patients with bipolar disorder. We hypothesize that the expression profile of inflammation-related genes known as M1 (CD45, CD80, HLA-DR, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-23) or M2 markers (CD206, CD209, CD23, BDNF, IL-10, and CCL18) of microglia may shift between manic and depressive states. In order to clarify this hypothesis, we herein analyzed iMG cells from three patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder during both manic and depressive states, respectively.

M1/M2 Microglia and Bipolar Disorder

Patients’ demographic data are shown in Table S1 in Supplementary Material. We produced iMG cells of each patient from both manic and depressive states and compared the gene expression profiles between both states. Relative gene expression (normalized by depressive state) of M1 and M2 markers are shown in Figures 1 and 2A,B, respectively.
Figure 1

Analysis of iMG cells from a typical case with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. (A) Physical/mental activity of a patient with rapid cycling bipolar disorder for 3 months (case 1). (B) Gene profiling pattern of iMG cells from case 1 showed that M1 microglia is dominant in the manic state compared to the depressive state.

Figure 2

Gene profiling pattern of iMG cells between depressive and manic states among three patients. (A) M1 markers, (B) M2 markers, and (C) statistical analysis of CD206 and CD45 among the three patients (mean value ± SD).

Analysis of iMG cells from a typical case with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. (A) Physical/mental activity of a patient with rapid cycling bipolar disorder for 3 months (case 1). (B) Gene profiling pattern of iMG cells from case 1 showed that M1 microglia is dominant in the manic state compared to the depressive state. Gene profiling pattern of iMG cells between depressive and manic states among three patients. (A) M1 markers, (B) M2 markers, and (C) statistical analysis of CD206 and CD45 among the three patients (mean value ± SD). We revealed that the gene profiling patterns of iMG cells are different between manic and depressive states. The profiling pattern of case 1 showed that M1 microglia is dominant in the manic state compared to the depressive state (Figure 1B). However, the patterns of cases 2 and 3 were not consistent with the pattern of case 1 (Figures 2A,B). For M1 markers, CD45 was downregulated in the manic state among all three patients. Other M1 markers such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-23, CD80, and HLA-DR shifted differently among the patients (Figure 2A). For M2 markers, CD206 was downregulated in the manic state among all three patients. Other M2 markers such as BDNF, IL-10, CCL18, CD23, and CD209 shifted differently among the patients (Figure 2B). Thus, we performed statistical analysis [Student’s t-test (two-tailed)] among the three patients. As shown in Figure 2C, CD206 was significantly downregulated in the manic state (p = 0.012). On the other hand, CD45 showed no significant difference between manic and depressive states (p = 0.057).

CD206 and Microglia

In the present study, we have shown that downregulation of the CD206 gene of iMG cells in the manic state was consistent across all three patients with bipolar disorder. CD206, known as a mannose receptor, is a 175-kDa transmembrane protein, mostly expressed by macrophages, dendritic cells, and endothelial cells. This receptor selectively and efficiently captures mannosylated ligands such as microbial antigen (21). In the brain, CD206 is also expressed in microglia (22, 23) and astrocytes (24, 25). CD206 is widely recognized as a typical M2 microglial marker (23, 26, 27). CD206 has some important cellular functions especially in pinocytosis and phagocytosis on microglia (22, 25, 28–30). Therefore, CD206 may be critical as the first step in the recognition and capture of pathogens in the brain (25). To date, there are no studies focusing on microglial CD206 in psychiatric disorders including bipolar disorder. In the present study, CD206 was downregulated in the manic state. This finding might suggest that the manic state of microglia is more vulnerable to the pathogen and/or insoluble matter compared to the depressive state. Based on the present results, M2 microglia may be dominant in the depressive state in patients with bipolar disorder, especially rapid cycling patients. Further translational investigations should be conducted to clarify our hypothesis.

Limitation and Future Perspectives

One major limitation of the present study is that all three patients were on medication. Given that it took 2 weeks to induce iMG cells, the influence of medication is assumed to be minimal. Additional studies are needed in medication-free patients. On the other hand, recent PET studies have suggested microglial overactivation in patients with bipolar disorder (7, 8). Thus, human PET studies should be conducted in patients with bipolar disorder during both manicdepressive states. However, even the most advanced brain imaging techniques cannot analyze M1/M2 polarization in the human brain, and thus we believe that the iMG technique has an advantage for such analyses in translational research. A recent study has revealed that the origin of brain microglia is primitive macrophages migrated from the yolk sac before embryonic day 8 (31). One of the limitations in the present study is that iMG cells are not actual microglial cells in the brain. However, we believe that our iMG cells are surrogate cells, which can represent some of the characteristics of brain microglial cells (13). Further comparison studies are needed to investigate the similarity and differences between brain microglial cells and iMG cells in more detail. The life span of intravascular blood monocytes is only a few days long (32). Thus, we believe that the iMG cells from peripheral blood monocytes are useful not only as a trait marker but also as a state marker in order to assess a variety of mental states. However, an inherent limitation of our iMG analysis is the time delay between the date of blood collection and the date of analysis of iMG cells (after 14 days) due to the necessity of 14-day induction from blood monocytes. Further investigations should be conducted to clarify the impact of time delays in analysis of iMG cells. The underlying biological mechanism shifting the expression patterns of iMG cells between depressive and manic states has not been clarified at present, while some internal and/or external factors are suggested to contribute to this shifting mechanism. Recent immunological studies have suggested that immune cell activities, including microglia, are modulated by the circadian clock system (33), methylation (34), and/or external stress (35), which may contribute to the activation patterns of microglia during clinical courses of bipolar disorder. A previous study has shown that peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder presented a different pattern of gene expression between manic and depressive states (36). In addition to the present study, this report also supports the premise that the cellular phenotype of microglia including M1/M2 state is different between depressive and manic states. Further studies are required to determine the clinical importance of these pilot findings.

Conclusion

We introduced a novel translational approach focusing on bipolar disorder using the iMG technique. To our knowledge, this is the first report to indicate the importance of shifting microglial CD206 gene expression between depressive and manic states. This study is the first step toward understanding the contribution of microglia to the pathogenesis of bipolar disorders. Further studies are needed to dig up the microglial roles in bipolar disorder.

Ethics Statement

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed substantially to the scientific process leading up to the writing of the present manuscript. TK: the principal investigator of the present research; MO: the first author created the conception and design of the project and wrote the protocol. YH, TM, YM, TM-H, and AM: performed the clinical recruitment. MO, TK, YH, TM, YM, NS, and TM-H: performed the experiments and data analyses/interpretation. MO: wrote the first draft of the manuscript. TK, AM, YM, and SK: made critical revisions of the manuscript. All the authors approved this submission in its current form.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
  36 in total

Review 1.  The mannose receptor in the brain.

Authors:  Anne Régnier-Vigouroux
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  2003

2.  Altered M1/M2 activation patterns of monocytes in severe relapsing experimental rat model of multiple sclerosis. Amelioration of clinical status by M2 activated monocyte administration.

Authors:  Joanna Mikita; Nadège Dubourdieu-Cassagno; Mathilde Sa Deloire; Antoine Vekris; Marc Biran; Gérard Raffard; Bruno Brochet; Marie-Hélène Canron; Jean-Michel Franconi; Claudine Boiziau; Klaus G Petry
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense.

Authors:  P D Stahl; R A Ezekowitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Neuroinflammation in schizophrenia-related psychosis: a PET study.

Authors:  Janine Doorduin; Erik F J de Vries; Antoon T M Willemsen; Jan Cees de Groot; Rudi A Dierckx; Hans C Klein
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Cytokines and schizophrenia: Microglia hypothesis of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Akira Monji; Takahiro Kato; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.188

Review 6.  Role of immunological factors in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of bipolar disorder: comparison with schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Carlo Altamura; Massimiliano Buoli; Sara Pozzoli
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.188

Review 7.  Circadian control of the immune system.

Authors:  Christoph Scheiermann; Yuya Kunisaki; Paul S Frenette
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 53.106

8.  Volume, metabolites and neuroinflammation of the hippocampus in bipolar disorder - A combined magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Bartholomeus C M 'Benno' Haarman; Huibert Burger; Janine Doorduin; Remco J Renken; Anita J Sibeijn-Kuiper; Jan-Bernard C Marsman; Erik F J de Vries; Jan Cees de Groot; Hemmo A Drexhage; Richard Mendes; Willem A Nolen; Rixt F Riemersma-Van der Lek
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 7.217

9.  M2 microglia and macrophages drive oligodendrocyte differentiation during CNS remyelination.

Authors:  Robin J M Franklin; Charles Ffrench-Constant; Veronique E Miron; Amanda Boyd; Jing-Wei Zhao; Tracy J Yuen; Julia M Ruckh; Jennifer L Shadrach; Peter van Wijngaarden; Amy J Wagers; Anna Williams
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Direct induction of ramified microglia-like cells from human monocytes: dynamic microglial dysfunction in Nasu-Hakola disease.

Authors:  Masahiro Ohgidani; Takahiro A Kato; Daiki Setoyama; Noriaki Sagata; Ryota Hashimoto; Kazue Shigenobu; Tetsuhiko Yoshida; Kohei Hayakawa; Norihiro Shimokawa; Daisuke Miura; Hideo Utsumi; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  11 in total

1.  Amelioration of visual deficits and visual system pathology after mild TBI with the cannabinoid type-2 receptor inverse agonist SMM-189.

Authors:  Natalie M Guley; Nobel A Del Mar; Tyler Ragsdale; Chunyan Li; Aaron M Perry; Bob M Moore; Marcia G Honig; Anton Reiner
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Maternal immune activation alters fetal and neonatal microglia phenotype and disrupts neurogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Marco Loayza; Shuying Lin; Kathleen Carter; Norma Ojeda; Lir-Wan Fan; Sumana Ramarao; Abhay Bhatt; Yi Pang
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.953

3.  Editorial: Minding Glial Cells in the Novel Understandings of Mental Illness.

Authors:  Takahiro A Kato; Aye M Myint; Johann Steiner
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Fibromyalgia and microglial TNF-α: Translational research using human blood induced microglia-like cells.

Authors:  Masahiro Ohgidani; Takahiro A Kato; Masako Hosoi; Makoto Tsuda; Kohei Hayakawa; Chie Hayaki; Rie Iwaki; Noriaki Sagata; Ryota Hashimoto; Kazuhide Inoue; Nobuyuki Sudo; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Microglia in post-mortem brain tissue of patients with bipolar disorder are not immune activated.

Authors:  Marjolein A M Sneeboer; Gijsje J L J Snijders; Woutje M Berdowski; Alba Fernández-Andreu; Hans C van Mierlo; Amber Berdenis van Berlekom; Manja Litjens; René S Kahn; Elly M Hol; Lot D de Witte
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Suicide and Microglia: Recent Findings and Future Perspectives Based on Human Studies.

Authors:  Hisaomi Suzuki; Masahiro Ohgidani; Nobuki Kuwano; Fabrice Chrétien; Geoffroy Lorin de la Grandmaison; Mitsumoto Onaya; Itaru Tominaga; Daiki Setoyama; Dongchon Kang; Masaru Mimura; Shigenobu Kanba; Takahiro A Kato
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 7.  Concepts of Neuroinflammation and Their Relationship With Impaired Mitochondrial Functions in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Luiz Arthur Rangel Cyrino; Daniela Delwing-de Lima; Oliver Matheus Ullmann; Thayná Patachini Maia
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Classification of Psychoses Based on Immunological Features: A Machine Learning Study in a Large Cohort of First-Episode and Chronic Patients.

Authors:  Paolo Enrico; Giuseppe Delvecchio; Nunzio Turtulici; Alessandro Pigoni; Filippo Maria Villa; Cinzia Perlini; Maria Gloria Rossetti; Marcella Bellani; Antonio Lasalvia; Chiara Bonetto; Paolo Scocco; Armando D'Agostino; Stefano Torresani; Massimiliano Imbesi; Francesca Bellini; Angela Veronese; Luisella Bocchio-Chiavetto; Massimo Gennarelli; Matteo Balestrieri; Gualtiero I Colombo; Annamaria Finardi; Mirella Ruggeri; Roberto Furlan; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  CD206 Expression in Induced Microglia-Like Cells From Peripheral Blood as a Surrogate Biomarker for the Specific Immune Microenvironment of Neurosurgical Diseases Including Glioma.

Authors:  Shunya Tanaka; Masahiro Ohgidani; Nobuhiro Hata; Shogo Inamine; Noriaki Sagata; Noritoshi Shirouzu; Nobutaka Mukae; Satoshi O Suzuki; Hideomi Hamasaki; Ryusuke Hatae; Yuhei Sangatsuda; Yutaka Fujioka; Kosuke Takigawa; Yusuke Funakoshi; Toru Iwaki; Masako Hosoi; Koji Iihara; Masahiro Mizoguchi; Takahiro A Kato
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Affective Immunology: The Crosstalk Between Microglia and Astrocytes Plays Key Role?

Authors:  Linglin Yang; Yunxiang Zhou; Honglei Jia; Yadong Qi; Sheng Tu; Anwen Shao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.