Literature DB >> 28119680

Novel Mutation Sites in the Development of Vancomycin- Intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Yubing Wang1, Xiaoli Li1, Libo Jiang2, Wentao Han1, Xiangming Xie1, Yi Jin2, Xiaoqing He2, Rongling Wu3.   

Abstract

Increased use of vancomycin has led to the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). To investigate the mechanism of VISA development, 39 methicillin-susceptible strains and 3 MRSA strains were treated with vancomycin to induce non-susceptibility, and mutations in six genes were analyzed. All the strains were treated with vancomycin in vitro for 60 days. MICs were determined by the agar dilution and E-test methods. Vancomycin was then removed to assess the stability of VISA strains and mutations. Following 60 days of vancomycin treatment in vitro, 29/42 VISA strains were generated. The complete sequences of rpoB, vraS, graR, graS, walK, and walR were compared with those in the parental strains. Seven missense mutations including four novel mutations (L466S in rpoB, R232K in graS, I594M in walk, and A111T in walR) were detected frequently in strains with vancomycin MIC ≥ 12 μg/mL. Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test indicated these mutations might play an important role during VISA evolution. After the vancomycin treatment, strains were passaged to vancomycin-free medium for another 60 days, and the MICs of all strains decreased. Our results suggest that rpoB, graS, walk, and walR are more important than vraS and graR in VISA development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; drug-resistance; jonckheere-terpstra trend test; mutations; vancomycin

Year:  2017        PMID: 28119680      PMCID: PMC5222870          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Multiple antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to be one of the most common pathogens of both hospital-associated and community-associated infections worldwide (Klevens et al., 2007; Popovich et al., 2007; Hidron et al., 2008; Kallen et al., 2010). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and viral hepatitis B are the three major infectious diseases worldwide and pose a serious threat to public health (Dantes et al., 2013). Vancomycin is the first-line antibiotic therapy for MRSA infections (Sieradzki et al., 1999; Deresinski, 2005; Moellering, 2005). However, increased use of vancomycin has led to the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) (Hiramatsu et al., 1997b). Currently, the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) categorizes S. aureus as vancomycin susceptible (VSSA) (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL), vancomycin intermediate resistant (4–8 μg/mL), and vancomycin resistant (VRSA) (MIC ≥ 16 μg/mL) (Patel, 2014). VISA has been reported more frequently worldwide and has aroused considerable concern (Hiramatsu et al., 1997a, 2002; Tenover and Moellering, 2007; Rishishwar et al., 2016). VRSA emerged in 1997 due to acquisition of the vanA gene from vancomycin-resistant enterococci (Hiramatsu et al., 1997a; Chang et al., 2003). Previous studies indicated that spontaneous mutations play important roles in the evolution of drug resistance (Drlica, 2003; Andersson and Hughes, 2014). However, the genetic mechanism of vancomycin resistance in VISA strains has not been identified fully (Cameron et al., 2016). Several of mutations in multiple genes and gene regulation systems are needed to achieve a VISA phenotype. Several genetic alterations in two-component regulatory systems have been reported to be strongly associated with a VISA phenotype, including mutations in the vraSR operon (Mwangi et al., 2007), graRS (Howden et al., 2008b; Neoh et al., 2008; Cui et al., 2009), and walRK (Howden et al., 2011; Shoji et al., 2011). VraS may serve as a switch for the activity of the “cell wall stimulon” (Gardete et al., 2012). The vraS I5N mutation was found to confer heterogeneous vancomycin resistance when introduced into a vancomycin-susceptible MRSA strain (Katayama et al., 2009). The graR N197S mutation was suggested to convert strain Mu3 into the VISA phenotype (Neoh et al., 2008). Howden et al. confirmed that the T136I mutation in graS is also a key mediator of vancomycin resistance (Howden et al., 2008b). The G223D mutation in walK and the K208R mutation in walR were associated with increased vancomycin MICs (Howden et al., 2011; Shoji et al., 2011). The rpoB gene, which encodes an RNA polymerase subunit, also plays an important role in the evolution of VISA (Matsuo et al., 2011). The H481Y mutation in rpoB has been confirmed by allelic replacement experiments to increase vancomycin resistance during development of the VISA phenotype in the Mu3 (hVISA) strain (Matsuo et al., 2011). The majority of previous reports on the genetic mechanism of VISA development have focused on clinical MRSA strains (Doddangoudar et al., 2012). The development of vancomycin non-susceptibility might be affected by methicillin or other drug resistance, and so VISA development in methicillin-susceptible strains warrants investigation. In this study, 39 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and 3 MRSA strains were treated with increasing concentrations of vancomycin in vitro to investigate the genetic mechanism underlying development of vancomycin resistance. The genes (rpoB, vraS, graSR, and walRK) important for development of vancomycin non-susceptibility were analyzed after 60 days of vancomycin treatment and compared with those in the parental strains. Our results suggest that four novel mutation sites are important for VISA development: L466S in rpoB, R232K in graS, I594M in walK, and A111T in walR.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Forty-two VSSA strains (numbered as S1–S42) used in this study were purchased from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection, Agricultural Culture Collection of China, China Forestry Culture Collection Center, China Center for Type Culture Collection, China Pharmaceutical Culture Collection, National Center for Medical Culture Collections, and China Agricultural University. All strain's background were described in Table 1. Only S22 and S24 were obtained from patients, others were separated from animals or environment. Among these 42 strains, three were MRSA (S3, S34, and S37). All strains were stored at −80°C.
Table 1

All strains' background.

Strain IDProviderStrain IDProvider
S1a21676bCICCS2223656 (ATCC 25923)CICC
S221600 (ATCC 27217c)CICCS2322944CICC
S301334ACCCS241.2465 (ATCC 6538)CGMCC
S401340ACCCS25AB 91119CCTCC
S501332ACCCS2610201CICC
S601331ACCCS2710499 (ATCC 12600)ACCC
S701339ACCCS2801012ACCC
S810341CFCCS29141405CPCC
S91.8721 (ATCC 29213)CGMCCS3026003CMCC
S101.1697CGMCCS3126112CMCC
S111.1476CGMCCS3201011ACCC
S12141396CPCCS3326001CMCC
S13140594CPCCS34141431CPCC
S14140575CPCCS35140660CPCC
S1521648CICCS361.1529CGMCC
S1610786CICCS37P1CAU
S1722942CICCS38AB18CAU
S18AB 94004CCTCCS39CD1CAU
S19AB 91093CCTCCS40CD9CAU
S20AB 91053CCTCCS41CD7CAU
S2123699CICCS4201336ACCC

Strain number;

Center ID;

ATCC ID.

CICC, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection; ACCC, Agricultural Culture Collection of China; CFCC, China Forestry Culture Collection Center; CPCC, China Pharmaceutical Culture Collection; CMCC, National Center for Medical Culture Collections; CCTCC, China Center for Type Culture Collection; CGMCC, China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center; CAU, China Agricultural University.

All strains' background. Strain number; Center ID; ATCC ID. CICC, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection; ACCC, Agricultural Culture Collection of China; CFCC, China Forestry Culture Collection Center; CPCC, China Pharmaceutical Culture Collection; CMCC, National Center for Medical Culture Collections; CCTCC, China Center for Type Culture Collection; CGMCC, China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center; CAU, China Agricultural University.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The vancomycin MICs of all S. aureus parental strains were determined by standardized agar dilution methods, according to the CLSI guidelines (Cockerill, 2012). E-tests were performed using glycopeptide resistance detection strips (bioMérieux), including vancomycin, oxacillin, rifampicin, teicoplanin, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For determination of MICs, a single colony was inoculated in brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated at 37°C. At a cell density of 0.5 McFarland units (108 CFU/mL), bacteria were streaked evenly onto Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates. Plates were incubated at 37°C, and the MICs were read after 18–24 h of incubation.

In vitro development of vancomycin non-susceptibility

All S. aureus strains were incubated on BHI agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates with vancomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 50% of the initial MIC. Plates were incubated at 37°C, and the strains were passaged to fresh medium containing the same vancomycin concentration every 24 h. MICs were re-determined after 4 days of treatment using the E-test method. The vancomycin concentration was increased to 50% of the new MIC level of each strain. This process was repeated every 4 days for 60 days. Stability of VISA strains was then determined by passaging onto vancomycin-free agar plates every 24 h for 60 days.

Sequence analysis and mutation detection

To identify the point mutations and amino acid changes between 60-day-treated and parental strains, the rpoB, vraS, graS, graR, walK, and walR genes of all treated and parental strains were amplified using the primers shown in Table 2. One colony of each strain was treated with lysostaphin and lysozyme, and genomic DNA was extracted using a TIANamp bacteria DNA kit (Tiangen, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR amplification using genomic DNA as the template was performed using Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). The amplification conditions for rpoB, graS, and walK were as follows: 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final step at 72°C for 7 min. The amplification conditions for vraS, graR, and walR were as follows: 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final step at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were purified, and their sequences were analyzed. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence comparisons of each pair of treated and parental strains were performed using DNAMAN8.0 (Lynnon Biosoft, USA). Based on the amino acid sequence alignment, the missense mutations were analyzed by Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
Table 2

Sequences of Primers.

Gene5′–3′ primer sequenceProduct length (bp)
vraS FGACGTAGAGGTGATTTATCGATGAACCACT1044
vraS RTTAATCGTCATACGAATCCTCCTTATTTAA
graS FATGAGTATGGAACTTGGCGCA1592
graS RTTCCCAGATCCAGAGGGACC
graR FGGATTAAAGATTTTCAAAGTC675
graR RGAGATTTCAAAAAATAAGCTAC
walR FACCAGGTTGGACAGAAGACG2000
walR RTGTGCATTTACGGAGCCCTT
walK FCGCGTAGAGGCGTTGGATA1983
walK RTGGCTGTCATAGGTGTCGTT
rpoB F1GCAAGGTATGCCATCTGCAAAG1954
rpoB R1TTGCTTCGGCGATACATCCA
rpoB F2ACGTGAACGTGCTCAAATGG2262
rpoB R2ATGCCTTTGTAGCGAACACG
Sequences of Primers. The presence of mecA and vanA in all strains was detected as described previously using the following primers: mecA forward 5′-TGGCTATCGTGTCACAATCG-3′; reverse 5′-CTGGAACTTGTTGAGCAGAG-3′; vanA forward 5′-ATGAATAGAATAAAAGTTGC-3′; reverse 5′-TCACCCCTTTAACGCTAATA-3′ (Saha et al., 2008). The multilocus sequence typing (MLST) genotypes of all strains were also determined as described (Enright et al., 2000). Seven housekeeping genes of all parental strains were sequenced to obtain the sequence type (ST) of each strain.

Statistical analysis

Based on the relationships between the MICs and time points during the vancomycin treatment, the 42 strains were grouped by hierarchical clustering (Tibshirani et al., 2001). After the in vitro treatment, genotypes were coded as 0, 1, or 2 for each SNP in sequenced genes. The association between each mutation site and MICs measured after 60 days vancomycin treatment was analyzed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra (JT) trend test (Jonckheere, 1954). P < 0.05 were considered to indicate significance. All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software (version 2.1).

Results

Development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance in S. aureus in vitro

Forty-two VSSA strains were treated with vancomycin in vitro for 60 days. After induction, although the MICs varied, only the MIC of the S10 strain remained unchanged compared with its parental strain. In contrast, the MICs of many strains increased significantly (Figure 1). Twenty-nine VISA strains were generated within 60 days, while 13 strains remained vancomycin susceptible (MIC < 4 μg/mL). The maximum MIC of 16 μg/mL was achieved in 4/29 strains: S8, S15, S16, and S41. The MICs of these four strains met the standard for VRSA rather than VISA strains; however, the vanA gene cluster, a common vancomycin-resistance determinant, was absent (data not shown). The MICs of all strains were listed in Table 3.
Figure 1

Hierarchical clustering of 42 strains. Based on the association between MICs and time point, the entire 42 strains were grouped into 5 clusters by hierarchical clustering.

Table 3

Amino acids mutations in VISA development.

ClusterStrainSTaMICb(μg/mL)RpoBvraSgraRgraSwalKwalR
C1S15971.5/16L466Sc, H481N, T1182IV15Gd (Q148Q)eI59L, R232KR222K, A468T, I594MA111T
S162391.5/16—(S466S, N481N)G15V— (Q148Q)— (K232K)I594M, (K222K, T468T)A111T
S4191.0/16L466S, H481NV15GD148QL26F, I59L, R232KR222K, A468T, I594MA111T
S289431.5/14T1182IQ126KK17E, (Q148Q)I59L, D97EL265R
S239431.0/12T1182IT331I— (Q148Q)I193M
C2S861.5/16D1046V— (D148D)L59ID266N
S951.5/12R917S— (D148D)G25A
S322431.5/12F279L, I1182T— (Q148Q)L26F, D97ET270S, (T468T)
C3S3581.5/12L466S, H481NV15G— (Q148Q)R232KR222K, K294N, D302N, A468T, I594MA111T
S181.5/10— (Q148Q)L59IP216S
S32391.5/10T1182I, (S466S, N481N)— (Q148Q)L26F, I59L, R232K— (K222K, T468T)
S72431.5/10T518MV136I, S207G, (Q148Q)L59IH385P, (T468T)
S274641.0/8S79F, (Q148Q)A111V
S3791.0/8— (N481N)L105F— (D148D)L59I, E97DR264K, L265R, D302N
S3891.0/8— (D148D)L59I, E97D
S3991.0/8G92D— (D148D)L26F
S4091.0/8— (D148D)L26F, G209SL10F, S506Y, S591F
S344640.5/6— (D148D)
C4S11961.0/8D631E, T1182I— (D148D)F26LA243T
S52391.5/4Y737F, I1182TG15VQ148HL59IK540R, G560C, (T468T)
S134641.5/4— (Q148Q)I183K, R265L, H464Y
S179431.5/4T1182I— (Q148Q)I59L, D97ER119H
S194641.0/4— (Q148Q)F192L
S204641.0/4— (Q148Q)T471I
S214641.5/4— (Q148Q)V15L, R265L
S252431.5/4— (Q148Q)— (T468T)
S264641.0/4G20A— (Q148Q)W158CL265R, T279I
S314641.5/4— (Q148Q)— (T468T)
S4251.5/4— (D148D)F26L, R160H, Y223D, I224TD302N
S251.5/3— (D148D)R265L
S42431.5/3— (Q148Q)— (T468T)
S62431.5/3P945S, I1182T— (Q148Q)I59L— (T468T)
S124641.5/3— (Q148Q)F26L, L59ID290E
S144641.0/3G1139V, T1182I— (Q148Q)F26LR343H
S18961.0/3T1182I— (D148D)R265L, R298MR222L
S222431.5/3T1182II136V, G207S, (Q148Q)T224I— (T468T)
S244641.5/3I1182T— (Q148Q)P216L
S294641.5/3— (Q148Q)
S304640.5/3— (Q148Q)R107H
S33301.0/3— (Q148Q)F26L, Y223DL265R, L314P
S367700.5/3— (D148D)L26F, D223Y
C5S1091.0/1— (D148D)L26F, D223Y, T224IK208N, P216Q

ST, sequence type.

MIC (μg/mL), MICs of parental/vancomycin treated strains.

Bold indicates the novel mutations.

Dash indicates amino acids had no change after 60 days vancomycin treatment.

Parentheses indicates the amino acids remain unchanged.

Hierarchical clustering of 42 strains. Based on the association between MICs and time point, the entire 42 strains were grouped into 5 clusters by hierarchical clustering. Amino acids mutations in VISA development. ST, sequence type. MIC (μg/mL), MICs of parental/vancomycin treated strains. Bold indicates the novel mutations. Dash indicates amino acids had no change after 60 days vancomycin treatment. Parentheses indicates the amino acids remain unchanged. Based on the relationships between the MICs and time points, the 42 strains were grouped into five clusters by hierarchical clustering (Figure 1). Eight strains were found in C1 and C2 and showed the highest MICs (12–16 μg/mL). These strains exhibited rapid development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance, which was accompanied by several common mutations in sequenced genes, such as L466S and H481N in rpoB, R232K in graS, R222K, A468T, and I594M in walK, and A111T in walR (Table 3). The third cluster comprised 10 strains. The MICs of these strains increased gradually over time, reaching 6–12 μg/mL. Twenty-three strains, including 12 VSSA strains, were grouped in C4 and exhibited slow development of vancomycin non-susceptibility, resulting in MICs of 3–8 μg/mL. Only the MIC of S11, which harbored the A243T mutation in walK, increased to 8 μg/mL (Table 3). Only strain S10 was grouped in C5. The MIC of S10 was unchanged after the 60 days of treatment. The sequence type (ST) of all parental strains was shown in Table 3. Most (8/9) of the strains with MICs ≥ 12 μg/mL were assigned to different ST types.

Antibiotic susceptibilities of all S. aureus strains

To determine susceptibilities to other antibiotics after 60 days of treatment, the oxacillin, rifampicin, and teicoplanin MICs of all strains were measured by the E-test. The MICs of several strains from each cluster are shown in Table 4. All of the 42 VSSA parental strains were initially susceptible to teicoplanin, three (S3, S34, and S37) were resistant to oxacillin, and two (S3 and S16) were resistant to rifampicin. After vancomycin treatment, the teicoplanin MICs of most strains increased, while the oxacillin and rifampicin MICs of most strains did not change. In contrast, the oxacillin MICs of five strains (S3, S15, S16, S34, and S37) decreased. Three VISA strains (S1560, S3560, and S3760) became resistant to rifampicin, and the five rifampicin resistant strains carried Asn (N) in the 481st amino acid of rpoB (Table 3). However, the parental strains S37 and S4160, which also carried this Asn (N), were susceptible to rifampicin.
Table 4

Antibiotic susceptibilities changes of strains.

ClusterStrainaMIC (μg/mL)Antibiotic susceptibilityE-test MIC (μg/mL)
OXARIFTEIOXARIFTEI
C1S151.5SSS10.0642
S156016SRI0.5>25616
S161.5SRS1>2564
S166016SRR0.5>25616
S411SSS0.50.0641
S416016SSS0.50.0648
S281.5SSS0.250.0644
S286014SSI0.250.06416
C2S81.5SSS0.50.0642
S86016SSI0.50.06416
S91.5SSS0.250.0642
S96012SSI0.250.06416
S321.5SSS0.1250.0642
S326012SSI0.1250.06416
C3S31.5RRS>256>2561
S36010RRS32>2568
S340.5RSS320.0640.5
S34606RSS80.0644
S351.5SSS0.250.0641
S356012SRS0.5>2568
S371RSS>25610.5
S37608RRS448
C4S21.5SSS0.1250.0642
S2603SSS0.250.0642
S51.5SSS0.1250.0641
S5604SSS0.1250.0642
S111SSS0.50.0640.064
S11608SSS0.50.0648
C5S101SSS0.250.0641
S10601SSS0.250.0641

OXA, oxacillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEI, teicoplanin. S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.

No subscript represents parental strains.

Subscript indicates strains treated by vancomycin for 60 days.

Antibiotic susceptibilities changes of strains. OXA, oxacillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEI, teicoplanin. S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant. No subscript represents parental strains. Subscript indicates strains treated by vancomycin for 60 days.

Amino acid mutations involved in VISA development

The complete sequences of rpoB, vraS, graS, graR, walK, and walR were amplified from all strains. Only missense mutations were observed by amino acid sequence alignment between the 60 days' vancomycin-treated strains and parental strains. A large number of SNPs were detected, and the mutations varied among the strains. Multiple nonsynonymous mutations in the six genes are shown in Table 3. In rpoB, we found 10 distinct amino acid changes in 13/29 (44.8%) VISA strains: F279L, L466S, H481N, T518M, D631E, Y737F, R917S, D1046V, and T1182I/I1182T. No amino acid substitution was found at the 466th or 481st locus in the VSSA strains treated by vancomycin for 60 days. Notably, the T1182I/I1182T mutations not only occurred frequently in VISA strains but were also found in VSSA strains. In vraS, seven distinct missense mutations were identified in 10/29 (34.5%) VISA strains. No nonsynonymous SNPs were found in the other VISA or VSSA strains. In the graRS operon, 19 distinct mutations were identified in 20/29 (69.0%) VISA strains. The L26F/F26L, I59L/L59I, and Y223D mutations were present in both VISA and VSSA strains, while the D223Y and T224I mutations were detected only in VSSA strains. Twenty-two of the 29 (75.9%) VISA strains harbored mutations in the walRK operon, including 23 distinct mutations in walK and 5 in walR. Among these mutations, R222K, A468T, and I594M in walK and A111T in walR occurred more frequently. Furthermore, all VSSA strains lacked R222K, I594M, and A111T but carried several other mutations. Overall, three VISA strains (S15, S35, and S41) contained the L466S and H481N mutations in rpoB, accompanied by the mutations R232K in graS, R222K, A468T, and I594M in walK, and A111T in walR and acquired high-level vancomycin resistance (MIC ≥ 12 μg/mL). The walK mutation was carried most frequently by VISA strains. A previous report stated that mutations in walK were most frequent in 39 clinical VISA strains from various countries (Shoji et al., 2011). To analyze the associations between mutation sites and MICs, strain genotypes were coded as 0, 1, or 2 for each mutation in sequenced genes. The associations between mutations and MICs at 60 days were analyzed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra (JT) trend test. As shown in Figure 2, 10 mutations (L466S and H481N in rpoB, V15G in vraS, L26F, I59L, Y223D, and R232K in graS, R222K, and I594M in walK and A111T in walR) were significantly correlated with the MIC differences, including four novel mutation sites (L466S in rpoB, R232K in graS, I594M in walK and A111T in walR). These four mutation sites were only occurred in five strains with MICs ≥ 10 μg/mL and have not been reported to date. The P values of all mutations in graR were >0.05, indicating that this gene might be relatively unimportant in the process of VISA development.
Figure 2

The significance of association between each mutation sites and MICs. Data was analyzed by Jonckheere-Terpstra (JT) trend test. The x axis shown six sequenced genes and the y axis shown −log10 of the P values resulting from the JT trend test. Each dot represented a mutation site, and the number beside the dot shown the amino acid position. P < 0.05 were considered significant. *The novel mutation sites found in this study.

The significance of association between each mutation sites and MICs. Data was analyzed by Jonckheere-Terpstra (JT) trend test. The x axis shown six sequenced genes and the y axis shown −log10 of the P values resulting from the JT trend test. Each dot represented a mutation site, and the number beside the dot shown the amino acid position. P < 0.05 were considered significant. *The novel mutation sites found in this study.

Stability of vancomycin non-susceptibility

To investigate the stability of vancomycin non-susceptibility, strains were incubated on vancomycin-free agar plates for another 60 days after the vancomycin treatment. The MICs of all strains (except S10) decreased after the removal of vancomycin, while S35 and S41 remained as VISA strains. Six genes (rpoB, vraS, graS, graR, walK, and walR) were sequenced and compared with the genes before vancomycin removal. The strains with mutations were shown in Table 5; 27 reverse mutations and 13 random mutations were detected compared with those vancomycin treated strains. Only the reverse mutation F10L in walK might be related to a decrease in the MIC.
Table 5

Mutations after removal of vancomycin.

ClusterStrainMIC (μg/mL)arpoBvraSgraRgraSwalKwalR
C1S153I1182Tbc
S163
S418
S283I1182TR265L, A554G
S233
C2S82N266D
S93
S322E97DL265R
C3S356N294K, N302D
S12
S32I1182T
S72
S273I1182T
S373K264R, R265L, N302D
S382
S392T1182I
S401F10L, Y506S, F591S
S341
C4S113
S53H148Q, V136I, S207GF26L
S132
S172
S191L192F
S202
S213E15D
S252I136V, G207S
S261R265L
S312
S422S39FN302D
S22
S42
S62
S122
S141I1182T
S182I1182TL265R
S222I1182TV136I, S207G
S242
S292
S301I1182T
S331P314L
S362
C5S101I1182TN208K, Q216P

MIC (μg/mL), MICs after vancomycin removal for 60 days.

Bold indicates reverse mutations.

Dash indicates the amino acids remain unchanged.

Mutations after removal of vancomycin. MIC (μg/mL), MICs after vancomycin removal for 60 days. Bold indicates reverse mutations. Dash indicates the amino acids remain unchanged.

Discussion

VISA strains are increasingly prevalent in the hospital setting and are a major issue in the treatment of MRSA infections. It has been suggested that the occurrence of VISA strains is relatively frequent, representing a threat to public health (Sader et al., 2009). Prolonged vancomycin exposure in patients can contribute to generation of VISA, resulting in treatment failure (Liu et al., 2011). In addition, VISA can also be generated in vitro from VSSA strains by exposure to vancomycin (Matsuo et al., 2011; Doddangoudar et al., 2012). Previous studies of the mechanisms of VISA development focused on clinical MRSA strains (Doddangoudar et al., 2012), while few studies have addressed VISA development in methicillin-susceptible strains. In this study, 29 (69%) VISA strains were generated from 42 S. aureus strains by vancomycin treatment for 60 days in vitro. Our results suggest that seven mutation sites are important for VISA development, including four novel mutations: L466S in rpoB, R232K in graS, I594M in walK, and A111T in walR. Hierarchical clustering which can directly decompose the dataset into a set of disjoint clusters was performed to trace the dynamic changes in VISA development, and investigate different vancomycin non-susceptibility evolution patterns. The 42 strains were grouped into five clusters, and the MICs of nine strains (eight from C1 and C2 and one from C3) were ≥12 μg/mL (Figure 1). Among those nine strains, only S28 and S23 were assigned to the same ST type (Table 3). 38/42 parental strains was susceptible to oxacillin, rifampicin and teicoplanin. The three MRSA strains (S3, S34, and S37) were resistant to oxacillin, and 2/42 strains (S3 and S16) were resistant to rifampicin. Strains S3 and S16 developed high MICs (10–16 μg/mL) after vancomycin treatment. Three methicillin-susceptible strains—S8, S15, and S41—showed the highest MIC of 16 μg/mL. There was no significant correlation between VISA development and initial resistance to oxacillin, rifampicin or teicoplanin. The oxacillin MICs of five strains (S3, S15, S16, S34, and S37) decreased after vancomycin treatment. It has been suggested that upon acquisition of vancomycin resistance, some strains show a concomitant decrease in oxacillin resistance (Bhateja et al., 2006), and a previous study reported that mutated graR may impair oxacillin resistance (Neoh et al., 2008). In this study, no graR mutation was detected in these five strains. The H481Y/N mutation is located in the rifampin resistance-determining region, and this locus has been reported repeatedly in clinical rifampicin-resistant S. aureus strains (Aubry-Damon et al., 1998; O'Neill et al., 2006; Mick et al., 2010). In this study, five rifampicin-resistant strains harbored the Asn (N) mutation in the 481st amino acid of rpoB (Table 3). However, the parental strains S37 and S4160, which harbor Asn (N), were susceptible to rifampicin. In summary, no significant association was found between these mutations and antibiotic susceptibility changes. The genetic basis for vancomycin resistance in VISA remains unclear. The rpoB, vraSR, graSR, and walRK genes have been reported to be highly associated with vancomycin resistance. In this study, the complete sequences of rpoB, vraS, graS, graR, walK, and walR were analyzed and compared with those of the susceptible parental strains. Seven mutations occurred more frequently in strains with high MICs (12–16 μg/mL), including L466S and H481N in rpoB, R232K in graS, R222K, A468T, and I594M in walK, and A111T in walR (Table 3). In vitro experiment and JT trend test indicated that four novel mutation sites were important for VISA development—L466S, R232K, I594M, and A111T—which were first reported in this study (Figure 2). Alam et al. reported that rpoB H481 is the predominant locus associated with an increased vancomycin MIC (Alam et al., 2014). The mutations H481Y/N in rpoB play a dual role in rifampin and vancomycin resistance (Watanabe et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2013). Moreover, it has been suggested that the rpoB mutation itself, and not any other incidental genetic change caused by rifampin resistance, was responsible for the decreased vancomycin susceptibility (Matsuo et al., 2011). In this study, two mutations (L466S and H481N) were significantly associated with increased vancomycin MICs. Although the L466S mutation had not been reported previously, it might be important for the development of VISA. In vraS, the 15th amino acid locus was significantly associated with MIC according to the JT trend test, but both the V15G and G15V mutations were detected in different VISA strains. Therefore, V15G/G15V seemed to be less important in VISA development. D148Q mutation in graR was reported previously to be important for development of high-level resistance (Neoh et al., 2008; Doddangoudar et al., 2012). In this study, only the S41 strain contained the D148Q mutation in graR (MIC = 16 μg/mL), while 28/42 (66.7%) VSSA parental strains initially harbored Gln (Q) at locus 148. Therefore, we speculated that the D148Q mutation in graR did not significantly affect the development of vancomycin resistance. The S79F mutation is important in the development of VISA strains (Neoh et al., 2008; Shoji et al., 2011; Doddangoudar et al., 2012; Hafer et al., 2012). Among our strains, only S27 carried the S79F mutation, and exhibited a MIC of 8 μg/mL. According to the JT trend test, no mutation in graR and four mutations (L26F, I59L, Y223D, and R232K) in graS were significantly related to elevated vancomycin MICs. However, the L26F/F26L, I59L/L59I, and Y223D mutations were detected in both VISA and VSSA strains. Thus, these mutation sites were unlikely to be responsible for VISA development. The R232K mutation occurred frequently (3/9) in strains with high MICs (12–16 μg/mL) and was absent in VSSA strains. This suggests that the R232K mutation is involved in the development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance. G223D mutation in walK and K208R mutation in walR were associated with increased vancomycin MICs (Howden et al., 2011; Shoji et al., 2011). However, these genetic changes are not observed frequently in clinical and laboratory S. aureus strains (Howden et al., 2008a,b; Kato et al., 2010). Shoji et al. collected 39 clinical VISA strains from various countries worldwide and then analyzed the complete sequences of vraSR, graSR, clpP, and walRK. Nine of the 39 (23%) VISA strains from four countries harbored R222K and A468T mutations in walK. The L10F and A243T mutations in walK and P216S in walR have been reported previously in VISA strains (Shoji et al., 2011; Hafer et al., 2012). In this study, 3/9 VISA strains with MICs ≥ 12 μg/mL harbored the R222K mutation, S3 and S16 initially carried Lys (K) at locus 222. The A468T mutation occurred in the same three VISA strains as R222K, while other ten strains carried Thr (T) including seven VISA strains initially (Table 3). Therefore, A468T seemed to be important for VISA development. According to the JT trend test, R222K, I594M in walK and A111T in walR were significantly associated with vancomycin resistance. Although the mutations I594M in walK and A111T in walR have not been reported to date, they were frequently detected (4/9) in strains with MICs ≥ 12 μg/mL. The presence of I594M and A111T in the same strain may result in development of the VISA phenotype. Overall, seven amino acid changes—L466S, H481N, R232K, R222K, A468T, I594M, and A111T—were detected frequently in our VISA strains. Although the four novel non-synonymous mutations L466S, R232K, I594M, and A111T have not been reported to date, we speculate that these mutations may play an important role in development of VISA strains, together with the H481N, R222K, and A468T mutations, synergistically promote and maintain high-level vancomycin resistance. Several other mutations were detected in both VISA and VSSA strains or in only VSSA strains. Whether these mutations affect development of a VISA phenotype remains unknown. Notably, certain VISA strains did not harbor any important mutations within the sequenced genes. The increased MICs of these strains may be caused by mutations in other undetected/unidentified genes, such as the proteolytic regulatory gene clp (Shoji et al., 2011) and the accessory gene regulator agr (Sakoulas et al., 2002, 2005). After removal of vancomycin for 60 days, the MICs of all strains decreased. The L10F mutation in walK has been reported previously in VISA strains, thus, the reverse mutation F10L in walK might be associated with loss of vancomycin resistance. These findings suggest that VISA development is affected by a complex gene regulatory network, although other genes or pathways might be involved in decreased MICs observed. The presence of stop codons in vraS and graR was reported to be related to loss of vancomycin non-susceptibility (Doddangoudar et al., 2012). However, no stop codon was detected in this study. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that prolonged vancomycin exposure leads to development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains. Compared with the susceptible parental strains, four novel missense mutations—L466S in rpoB, R232K in graS, I594M in walK and A111T in walR—were detected in high-level vancomycin-resistant strains. Our results also suggest that rpoB, graS, walK and walR are more important than vraS and graR in the evolution of vancomycin non-susceptibility.

Author contributions

YJ, XH, and RW conceived and designed the experiments. YW, XL, LJ, and WH. performed the experiments. XX, YJ, XH, and RW analyzed the data, YW and YJ. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (TD2012-03), the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (201404102), Natural Science Foundation of China (51108029) and a “One-Thousand Person Plan” award.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer SA and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.
  43 in total

Review 1.  The management of infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  R C Moellering
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Molecular genetic and structural modeling studies of Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase and the fitness of rifampin resistance genotypes in relation to clinical prevalence.

Authors:  A J O'Neill; T Huovinen; C W G Fishwick; I Chopra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The RpoB H₄₈₁Y rifampicin resistance mutation and an active stringent response reduce virulence and increase resistance to innate immune responses in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Wei Gao; David R Cameron; John K Davies; Xenia Kostoulias; Justin Stepnell; Kellie L Tuck; Michael R Yeaman; Anton Y Peleg; Timothy P Stinear; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Mutation of RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) promotes hVISA-to-VISA phenotypic conversion of strain Mu3.

Authors:  Miki Matsuo; Tomomi Hishinuma; Yuki Katayama; Longzhu Cui; Maria Kapi; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin and platelet microbicidal protein correlates with defective autolysis and loss of accessory gene regulator (agr) function.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; George M Eliopoulos; Vance G Fowler; Robert C Moellering; Richard P Novick; Natalie Lucindo; Michael R Yeaman; Arnold S Bayer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Health care-associated invasive MRSA infections, 2005-2008.

Authors:  Alexander J Kallen; Yi Mu; Sandra Bulens; Arthur Reingold; Susan Petit; Ken Gershman; Susan M Ray; Lee H Harrison; Ruth Lynfield; Ghinwa Dumyati; John M Townes; William Schaffner; Priti R Patel; Scott K Fridkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  New trends in Staphylococcus aureus infections: glycopeptide resistance in hospital and methicillin resistance in the community.

Authors:  Keiichi Hiramatsu; Keiko Okuma; Xiao Xue Ma; Munetaka Yamamoto; Satoshi Hori; Maria Kapi
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.915

9.  Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Michael M Mwangi; Shang Wei Wu; Yanjiao Zhou; Krzysztof Sieradzki; Herminia de Lencastre; Paul Richardson; David Bruce; Edward Rubin; Eugene Myers; Eric D Siggia; Alexander Tomasz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genomic analysis reveals a point mutation in the two-component sensor gene graS that leads to intermediate vancomycin resistance in clinical Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; Timothy P Stinear; David L Allen; Paul D R Johnson; Peter B Ward; John K Davies
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

1.  Detection of heterogeneous vancomycin intermediate resistance in MRSA isolates from Latin America.

Authors:  Betsy E Castro; Maritza Berrio; Monica L Vargas; Lina P Carvajal; Lina V Millan; Rafael Rios; Angie K Hernandez; Sandra Rincon; Paola Cubides; Erika Forero; An Dinh; Carlos Seas; Jose M Munita; Cesar A Arias; Jinnethe Reyes; Lorena Diaz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  RNA polymerase mutations cause cephalosporin resistance in clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates.

Authors:  Samantha G Palace; Yi Wang; Daniel Hf Rubin; Michael A Welsh; Tatum D Mortimer; Kevin Cole; David W Eyre; Suzanne Walker; Yonatan H Grad
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  In Vitro Evaluation of Gentamicin or Vancomycin Containing Bone Graft Substitute in the Prevention of Orthopedic Implant-Related Infections.

Authors:  Alessandro Bidossi; Marta Bottagisio; Nicola Logoluso; Elena De Vecchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Impact of vancomycin use trend change due to the availability of alternative antibiotics on the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility: a 14-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu Ri Kang; Si-Ho Kim; Doo Ryeon Chung; Jae-Hoon Ko; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Cheol-In Kang; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.454

5.  A vancomycin resistance-associated WalK(S221P) mutation attenuates the virulence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yifan Rao; Huagang Peng; Weilong Shang; Zhen Hu; Yi Yang; Li Tan; Ming Li; Renjie Zhou; Xiancai Rao
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 12.822

6.  Effect of genetic background on the evolution of Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA).

Authors:  Michelle Su; Michelle H Davis; Jessica Peterson; Claudia Solis-Lemus; Sarah W Satola; Timothy D Read
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  Phenotypic Plasticity of Staphylococcus aureus in Liquid Medium Containing Vancomycin.

Authors:  Mengdi Rong; Xuyang Zheng; Meixia Ye; Jun Bai; Xiangming Xie; Yi Jin; Xiaoqing He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Genomic insights on heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A first report from South India.

Authors:  Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam; Priyanka Babu; Elakkiya Munusamy; Hariharan Triplicane Dwarakanathan; Priscilla Rupali; Marcus Zervos; Peter John Victor; Balaji Veeraraghavan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.