Literature DB >> 28119141

A comparison of antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of phenothiazinium dyes between Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial biofilm.

Lama Misba1, Sahar Zaidi1, Asad U Khan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) is a process that generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in presence of photosensitizer, visible light and oxygen which destroys the bacterial cells. We investigated the photoinactivation efficiency of phenothiazinium dyes and the effect of ROS generation on Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial cell as well as on biofilm.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Enterococcus faecalis and Klebsiella pneumonia were incubated with all the three phenothiazinium dyes and exposed to 630nm of light. After PDT, colony forming unit (CFU) were performed to estimate the cell survival fraction. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected by DCFH-DA. Crystal violet (CV) assay and extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) reduction assay were performed to analyze antibiofilm effect. Confocal laser electron microscope (CLSM) scanning electron microscope (SEM) was performed to assess the disruption of biofilm.
RESULTS: 8log10 reduction in bacterial count was observed in Enterococcus faecalis while 3log10 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. CV and EPS reduction assay revealed that photodynamic inhibition was more pronounced in Enterococcus faecalis. In addition to this CLSM and SEM study showed an increase in cell permeability of propidium iodide and leakage of cellular constituents in treated preformed biofilm which reflects the antibiofilm action of photodynamic therapy.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis) are more susceptible to APDT due to increased level of ROS generation inside the cell, higher photosensitizer binding efficiency and DNA degradation. Phenothiazinium dyes are proved to be highly efficient against both planktonic and biofilm state of cells.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; DCFH-DA; DNA fragmentation; Gram negative; Gram positive; Photodynamic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28119141     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.01.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  14 in total

1.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against clinical isolates of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Mirian Marcolan De Mello; Patrícia Pimentel De Barros; Renata de Cassia Bernardes; Silvio Rubens Alves; Naiara Pires Ramanzini; Lívia Mara Alves Figueiredo-Godoi; Ana Carolina Chipoletti Prado; Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge; Juliana Campos Junqueira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Latest trends on photodynamic disinfection of Gram-negative bacteria: photosensitizer's structure and delivery systems.

Authors:  Nidia Maldonado-Carmona; Tan-Sothea Ouk; Stéphanie Leroy-Lhez
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Innovative Strategies Toward the Disassembly of the EPS Matrix in Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Rita M Pinto; Filipa A Soares; Salette Reis; Cláudia Nunes; Patrick Van Dijck
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities.

Authors:  Divakar Sharma; Lama Misba; Asad U Khan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using malachite green encapsulated mesoporous silica nanoparticles: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Parasuraman Paramanantham; Busi Siddhardha; Sruthil Lal Sb; Alok Sharan; Abdullah A Alyousef; Mohammed Saeed Al Dosary; Mohammed Arshad; Asad Syed
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Influence of In-Situ Electrochemical Oxidation on Implant Surface and Colonizing Microorganisms Evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Maximilian Göltz; Maximilian Koch; Rainer Detsch; Matthias Karl; Andreas Burkovski; Stefan Rosiwal
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Inactivation Efficacy of 405 nm LED Against Cronobacter sakazakii Biofilm.

Authors:  Yixiao Huang; Quanwei Pei; Ruisha Deng; Xiaoying Zheng; Jialu Guo; Du Guo; Yanpeng Yang; Sen Liang; Chao Shi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Authors:  Minh Tam Tran Thi; David Wibowo; Bernd H A Rehm
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Insights Into Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Action Toward Biofilms Using Phenalen-1-One Derivatives as Photosensitizers.

Authors:  Denise Muehler; Christina M Rupp; Sercan Keceli; Christoph Brochhausen; Heiko Siegmund; Tim Maisch; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Fabian Cieplik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid-Coated Toluidine Blue Nanoparticles for the Antibacterial Therapy of Wounds.

Authors:  Xiaomu Xu; Bo Liu; Haiyan Wu; Yichi Zhang; Xinyuan Tian; Jijing Tian; Tianlong Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.