Literature DB >> 28118743

Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.

Heather L Colquhoun1,2, Tiago S Jesus3,4, Kelly K O'Brien2,5,6, Andrea C Tricco7,8, Adora Chui1, Wasifa Zarin7, Erin Lillie7, Sander L Hitzig1,9, Sharon Straus7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scoping reviews are increasingly popular in rehabilitation. However, significant variability in scoping review conduct and reporting currently exists, limiting potential for the methodology to advance rehabilitation research, practice and policy. Our aim is to conduct a scoping review of rehabilitation scoping reviews in order to examine the current volume, yearly distribution, proportion, scope and methodological practices involved in the conduct of scoping reviews in rehabilitation. Key areas of methodological improvement will be described. Methods and analysis: We will undertake the review using the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology. Our search will involve two phases. The first will combine a previously conducted scoping review of scoping reviews (not distinct to rehabilitation, with data current to July 2014) together with a rehabilitation keyword search in PubMed. Articles found in the first phase search will undergo a full text review. The second phase will include an update of the previously conducted scoping review of scoping reviews (July 2014 to current). This update will include the search of nine electronic databases, followed by title and abstract screening as well as a full text review. All screening and extraction will be performed independently by two authors. Articles will be included if they are scoping reviews within the field of rehabilitation. A consultation exercise with key targets will inform plans to improve rehabilitation scoping reviews. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics will be required for the consultation phase of our scoping review. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publication and conferences in rehabilitation-specific contexts.

Keywords:  Methodology; knowledge synthesis; quality of reporting; rehabilitation science; scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118743     DOI: 10.1177/0269215516688514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  13 in total

1.  Evolving Trends in Physiotherapy Research Publications between 1995 and 2015.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Silvia Gianola; Greta Castellini; Heather Colquhoun; Dina Brooks
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  Assessing Sensory Processing Dysfunction in Adults and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Denise DuBois; Erin Lymer; Barbara E Gibson; Pushpal Desarkar; Emily Nalder
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-08-19

Review 3.  Protocol for a scoping review of skin self-care of people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Daniella Karine Souza Lima; Soraia Dornelles Schoeller; Neide da Silva Knihs; Caroline Porcelis Vargas; Adriana Dutra Tholl; Soraia Geraldo Rozza Lopes; Maria Manuela Martins; Karina Silveira de Almeida Hammerschmidt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Explicit and implicit experience of own's body in painful musculoskeletal disorders and rheumatic diseases: A scoping review protocol of available quantitative and qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Antonello Viceconti; Eleonora Maria Camerone; Deborah Luzzi; Matteo Pardini; Diego Ristori; Alberto Gallace; Marco Testa
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 5.  Occupational Therapy's Unique Contribution to Chronic Pain Management: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Émilie Lagueux; Andréa Dépelteau; Julie Masse
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Strategies occupational therapists employ to facilitate work-related transitions for persons with hand injuries: a study protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Michelle Elizabeth Uys; Helen Buchanan; Lana Van Niekerk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Explicit and Implicit Own's Body and Space Perception in Painful Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Antonello Viceconti; Eleonora Maria Camerone; Deborah Luzzi; Debora Pentassuglia; Matteo Pardini; Diego Ristori; Giacomo Rossettini; Alberto Gallace; Matthew R Longo; Marco Testa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Bridging knowledge, policies and practices across the ageing and disability fields: a protocol for a scoping review to inform the development of a taxonomy.

Authors:  Emily Joan Nalder; Michelle Putnam; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Andria Spindel; Zinnia Batliwalla; Erica Lenton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Protocol for a scoping review on nursing care and the autonomy of disabled persons.

Authors:  Soraia Dornelles Schoeller; Daniella Karine Souza Lima; Maria Manuela Martins; Flávia Regina Souza Ramos; Milena Amorim Zuchetto; Luciana Neves da Silva Bampi; Cristine Moraes Roos; Adriana Dutra Tholl; Liliam Cristiana Julio Tonnera; Wiliam Cesar Alves Machado; Caroline Porcelis Vargas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Impact of economic recessions on healthcare workers and their crises' responses: study protocol for a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence for the development of an evidence-based conceptual framework.

Authors:  Tiago Silva Jesus; Elias Kondilis; Jonathan Filippon; Giuliano Russo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.