Literature DB >> 28118694

Musculoskeletal disorders of the upper cervical spine in women with episodic or chronic migraine.

Gabriela N Ferracini1, Lidiane L Florencio2, Fabíola Dach1, Débora Bevilaqua Grossi2, María Palacios-Ceña3, Carlos Ordás-Bandera4, Thais C Chaves1, José G Speciali1, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of musculoskeletal disorders of the cervical spine in migraine is under debate. AIM: To investigate differences in musculoskeletal impairments of the neck including active global and upper cervical spine mobility, the presence of symptomatic upper cervical spine joints, cervicocephalic kinesthesia and head/neck posture between women with episodic migraine, chronic migraine, and controls.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Tertiary university-based hospital. POPULATION: Fifty-five women with episodic migraine, 16 with chronic migraine, and 22 matched healthy women.
METHODS: Active cervical range of motion, upper cervical spine mobility (i.e., flexion-rotation test), referred pain from upper cervical joints, cervicocephalic kinesthesia (joint position sense error test, JPSE), and head/neck posture (i.e. the cranio-vertebral and cervical lordosis angles) were assessed by an assessor blinded to the subject's condition.
RESULTS: Women with migraine showed reduced cervical rotation than healthy women (P=0.012). No differences between episodic and chronic migraine were found in cervical mobility. Significant differences for flexion-rotation test were also reported, suggesting that upper cervical spine mobility was restricted in both migraine groups (P<0.001). Referred pain elicited on manual examination of the upper cervical spine mimicking pain symptoms was present in 50% of migraineurs. No differences were observed on the frequency of symptomatic upper cervical joints between episodic and chronic migraine. No differences on JPSE or posture were found among groups (P>0.121).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with migraine exhibit musculoskeletal impairments of the upper cervical spine expressed as restricted cervical rotation, decreased upper cervical rotation, and the presence of symptomatic upper cervical joints. No differences were found between episodic or chronic migraine. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Identification treatment of the musculoskeletal impairments of the cervical spine may help to clinician for better management of patients with migraine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118694     DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04393-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  9 in total

1.  Reduced flexion rotation test in women with chronic and episodic migraine.

Authors:  Ana Izabela S Oliveira-Souza; Lidiane L Florencio; Gabriela F Carvalho; César Fernández-De-Las-Peñas; Fabiola Dach; Debora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Only cervical vertebrae C0-C2, not C3 are relevant for subgrouping migraine patients according to manual palpation and pain provocation: secondary analysis of a cohort study.

Authors:  Annika Schwarz; Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Involvement of cervical disability in migraine: a literature review.

Authors:  Naoki Aoyama
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-05-31

4.  Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine.

Authors:  Zhiqi Liang; Lucy Thomas; Gwendolen Jull; Julia Treleaven
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2021-12-08

5.  Neck-specific strengthening exercise compared with placebo sham ultrasound in patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariana Tedeschi Benatto; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Marcela Mendes Bragatto; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Repetitive Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation for Pediatric Headache Disorders: Muscular Effects and Factors Affecting Level of Response.

Authors:  Corinna Börner; Jacob Staisch; Magdalena Lang; Ari Hauser; Iris Hannibal; Kristina Huß; Birgit Klose; Matthias F Lechner; Nico Sollmann; Florian Heinen; Mirjam N Landgraf; Michaela V Bonfert
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-16

7.  Prediction models of health-related quality of life in different neck pain conditions: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hector Beltran-Alacreu; Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva; César Calvo-Lobo; Roy La Touche; Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda; Alfonso Gil-Martínez; David Fernández-Ayuso; Josué Fernández-Carnero
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Manual therapy as a prophylactic treatment for migraine: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Leonard Amons; Rene Franciscus Castien; Johannes C van der Wouden; Willem De Hertogh; Joost Dekker; Henriëtte Eveline van der Horst
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Comparison of cervical muscle isometric force between migraine subgroups or migraine-associated neck pain: a controlled study.

Authors:  Lidiane Lima Florencio; Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira; Carina Ferreira Pinheiro; Tenysson Will-Lemos; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.