Dominic A Gioia1, Brian McCool1. 1. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inbred mouse strains are differentially sensitive to the acute effects of ethanol (EtOH) and are useful tools for examining how unique genomes differentially affect alcohol-related behaviors and physiology. DBA/2J mice have been shown to be sensitive to the acute anxiolytic effects of alcohol as well as the anxiogenic effects of withdrawal from chronic alcohol exposure, while B6 mice are resistant to both. Considering that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is an important brain region for the acute and chronic effects of EtOH on fear and anxiety related behaviors, we hypothesized that there would be strain-dependent differences in the acute effects of EtOH in BLA slices. METHODS: We utilized patch clamp electrophysiology in BLA coronal slices from 4 inbred mouse strains (A/J, BALBcJ, C57BL/6J, and DBA/2J) to examine how genetic background influences acute EtOH effects on synaptic vesicle recycling and post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) in response to low (2 Hz)- and high (40 Hz)-frequency stimulation. RESULTS: We found that EtOH inhibited synaptic vesicle recycling in a strain- and stimulation frequency-dependent manner. Vesicle recycling in DBA/2J and BALBcJ cells was inhibited by acute EtOH during both low- and high-frequency stimulation, while recycling measured from A/J cells was sensitive only during high-frequency stimulation. Recycling at C57BL/6J synapses was insensitive to EtOH regardless of stimulation frequency. We additionally found that cells from DBA/2J and BALBcJ mice were sensitive to EtOH-mediated inhibition of PTP. CONCLUSIONS: Acute EtOH application inhibited vesicle recycling and PTP at glutamatergic synapses in both a strain- and frequency-dependent fashion. Several presynaptic proteins that contribute to synaptic vesicle priming in addition to PTP have been implicated in alcohol-related behaviors, including Munc13, Munc18, and RIM proteins, making them potential candidates for the molecular mechanism controlling these effects.
BACKGROUND: Inbred mouse strains are differentially sensitive to the acute effects of ethanol (EtOH) and are useful tools for examining how unique genomes differentially affect alcohol-related behaviors and physiology. DBA/2J mice have been shown to be sensitive to the acute anxiolytic effects of alcohol as well as the anxiogenic effects of withdrawal from chronic alcohol exposure, while B6 mice are resistant to both. Considering that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is an important brain region for the acute and chronic effects of EtOH on fear and anxiety related behaviors, we hypothesized that there would be strain-dependent differences in the acute effects of EtOH in BLA slices. METHODS: We utilized patch clamp electrophysiology in BLA coronal slices from 4 inbred mouse strains (A/J, BALBcJ, C57BL/6J, and DBA/2J) to examine how genetic background influences acute EtOH effects on synaptic vesicle recycling and post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) in response to low (2 Hz)- and high (40 Hz)-frequency stimulation. RESULTS: We found that EtOH inhibited synaptic vesicle recycling in a strain- and stimulation frequency-dependent manner. Vesicle recycling in DBA/2J and BALBcJ cells was inhibited by acute EtOH during both low- and high-frequency stimulation, while recycling measured from A/J cells was sensitive only during high-frequency stimulation. Recycling at C57BL/6J synapses was insensitive to EtOH regardless of stimulation frequency. We additionally found that cells from DBA/2J and BALBcJ mice were sensitive to EtOH-mediated inhibition of PTP. CONCLUSIONS: Acute EtOH application inhibited vesicle recycling and PTP at glutamatergic synapses in both a strain- and frequency-dependent fashion. Several presynaptic proteins that contribute to synaptic vesicle priming in addition to PTP have been implicated in alcohol-related behaviors, including Munc13, Munc18, and RIM proteins, making them potential candidates for the molecular mechanism controlling these effects.
Authors: Daniel T Christian; Nancy J Alexander; Marvin R Diaz; Stacey Robinson; Brian A McCool Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Nancy J Alexander; Andrew R Rau; Vanessa A Jimenez; James B Daunais; Kathleen A Grant; Brian A McCool Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-07-15 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Anibal Araya; Scarlet Gallegos; Adolfo Maldonado; Mario Rivera-Meza; Ramesh Chandra; Mary Kay Lobo; Luis G Aguayo Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Reginald Cannady; Tiffany Nguyen; Audrey E Padula; Jennifer A Rinker; Marcelo F Lopez; Howard C Becker; John J Woodward; Patrick J Mulholland Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jacqueline K Rose; Michael Butterfield; Joseph Liang; Mahraz Parvand; Conny H S Lin; Catharine H Rankin Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.617