Literature DB >> 28118259

Comparisons in Muscle Function and Training Rehabilitation Outcomes Between Avoidance-Endurance Model Subgroups.

Elisabeth Fehrmann1, Kerstin Tuechler, Thomas Kienbacher, Patrick Mair, Juliane Spreitzer, Linda Fischer, Josef Kollmitzer, Gerold Ebenbichler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that chronic low back pain patients with fear-avoidance (FAR) or endurance behavior are at risk of treatment failure and pain maintenance, with bodily overuse or underuse being assumed as mediating mechanisms for pain chronification. This study sought to examine whether or not the avoidance-endurance model subgroups, FAR, distress-endurers (DER), eustress-endurers (EER), and adaptive responders (AR), differed in physical measures and outcomes after training therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 137 chronic low back pain patients were assessed before, at the end of, and 6 months after a 6-month rehabilitation training. Patients performed maximum back extension strength and trunk range-of-motion measures, flexion-relaxation tests, and completed the following questionnaires: Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and visual analog scale. Statistical analysis included cluster analysis, analysis of covariances, and mixed-effects models.
RESULTS: At baseline, avoidance-endurance model subgroups did not differ in physical measures and activity levels. At the end of training, patients' back-related health was significantly improved in all subgroups. However, the DER and the FAR were found to be more impaired before and after the intervention compared with EER and AR, as indicated by a higher pain intensity, higher disability levels, lower quality of life, and inferior working capacity. DISCUSSION: Although FAR and DER did not differ in physical measures or activity levels from EER and AR, they demonstrated poor lower back-related health at baseline and after intervention. Thus, future research should elucidate as to which additional interventions could optimize their health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118259     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  4 in total

Review 1.  The flexion relaxation phenomenon in nonspecific chronic low back pain: prevalence, reproducibility and flexion-extension ratios. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anaïs Gouteron; Anne Tabard-Fougère; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Jean-Marie Casillas; Stéphane Armand; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Subgroups in chronic low back pain patients - a step toward cluster-based, tailored treatment in inpatient standard care: On the need for precise targeting of treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Langenmaier; Volker Eric Amelung; Matthias Karst; Christian Krauth; Franziska Püschner; Dominika Urbanski; Christine Schiessl; Reinhard Thoma; Bernhard Klasen
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-11

3.  Endurance and avoidance response patterns in pain patients: Application of action control theory in pain research.

Authors:  Jana Buchmann; Nicola Baumann; Karin Meng; Jana Semrau; Julius Kuhl; Klaus Pfeifer; Miguel Kazén; Heiner Vogel; Hermann Faller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Florian Naye; Chloé Cachinho; Annie-Pier Tremblay; Maude Saint-Germain Lavoie; Gabriel Lepage; Emma Larochelle; Lorijane Labrecque; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2021-06-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.