Literature DB >> 28118204

Can Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Structural and Functional Measures?

Wolfgang A Schrems1, Laura-M Schrems-Hoesl, Christian Y Mardin, Robert Laemmer, Friedrich E Kruse, Folkert K Horn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography (OCT), morphometric parameters of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), and frequency-doubling technique perimetry to predict visual field conversion of normal individuals, ocular hypertensive subjects, and early preperimetric glaucoma patients as determined by standard automated perimetry (SAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This longitudinal single-center study included 107 eyes of 56 controls, 164 eyes of 98 patients with ocular hypertension, and 169 eyes of 110 patients with preperimetric glaucoma. At baseline, all patients and controls underwent OCT (Spectralis OCT), CSLO (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph) examination, optic disc photography, and frequency-doubling technique perimetry. At baseline SAP was normal in all participants. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) were measured to model the conversion-free survival including morphometric functional and clinical variables.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 6.9 years. In total, 48 eyes (10.9%) demonstrated visual field conversion in the follow-up. RNFLT temporal-inferior outside normal limits demonstrated the highest HR with 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4) per 10 μm loss for OCT, and Glaucoma probability score global outside normal limits demonstrated the highest HR with 1.3 (95 % confidence interval, 1.1-1.5) per 0.1 increase for CSLO in a multivariate model adjusted for photograph-based glaucoma staging, central corneal thickness, and SAP pattern SD.
CONCLUSIONS: Both measurement of RNFLT by OCT and Glaucoma probability score by CSLO are highly predictive of future visual field conversion and provide independent predictive information beyond optic disc assessment, central corneal thickness, and SAP pattern SD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118204     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Telemedicine for Glaucoma: Guidelines and Recommendations.

Authors:  Kenman Gan; Yao Liu; Brian Stagg; Siddarth Rathi; Louis R Pasquale; Karim Damji
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Practice Guidelines for Ocular Telehealth-Diabetic Retinopathy, Third Edition.

Authors:  Mark B Horton; Christopher J Brady; Jerry Cavallerano; Michael Abramoff; Gail Barker; Michael F Chiang; Charlene H Crockett; Seema Garg; Peter Karth; Yao Liu; Clark D Newman; Siddarth Rathi; Veeral Sheth; Paolo Silva; Kristen Stebbins; Ingrid Zimmer-Galler
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Prediction of Visual Field Progression from OCT Structural Measures in Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Alessandro Rabiolo; Kiumars Edalati; Joseph Caprioli; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.488

Review 4.  Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Lessons Learned From Glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Glaucoma and Alzheimer: Neurodegenerative disorders show an adrenergic dysbalance.

Authors:  Bettina Hohberger; Harald Prüss; Christian Mardin; Robert Lämmer; Johannes Müller; Gerd Wallukat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.