Literature DB >> 28118039

Residence in Rural Areas of the United States and Lung Cancer Mortality. Disease Incidence, Treatment Disparities, and Stage-Specific Survival.

Graham T Atkins1, Taeha Kim2, Jeffrey Munson1,3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: There is increased lung cancer mortality in rural areas of the United States. However, it remains unclear to what extent rural-urban differences in disease incidence, stage at diagnosis, or treatment explain this finding.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between smoking rates, lung cancer incidence, and lung cancer mortality in populations across the rural-urban continuum and to determine whether survival is decreased in rural patients diagnosed with lung cancer and whether this is associated with rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis or the treatment received.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 348,002 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2000 and 2006. Data from metropolitan, urban, suburban, and rural areas in the United States were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database. County-level population estimates for 2003 were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, and corresponding estimates of smoking prevalence were obtained from published literature. The exposure was rurality, defined by the rural-urban continuum code area linked to each cohort participant by county of residence. Outcomes included lung cancer incidence, mortality, diagnostic stage, and treatment received.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Lung cancer mortality increased with rurality in a dose-dependent fashion across the rural-urban continuum. The most rural areas had almost twice the smoking prevalence and lung cancer incidence of the largest metropolitan areas. Rural patients diagnosed with stage I non-small cell lung cancer underwent fewer surgeries (69% vs. 75%; P < 0.001) and had significantly reduced median survival (40 vs. 52 mo; P = 0.0006) compared with the most urban patients. Stage at diagnosis was similar across the rural-urban continuum, as was median survival for patients with stages II-IV lung cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher rural smoking rates drive increased disease incidence and per capita lung cancer mortality in rural areas of the United States. There were no rural-urban discrepancies in diagnostic stage, suggesting similar access to diagnostic services. Rural patients diagnosed with stage I non-small cell lung cancer had shorter survival, which may reflect disparities in access to surgical care. No survival difference for patients with advanced-stage lung cancer is attributed to lack of effective treatment during the time period of this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; lung neoplasms; rural population; smoking

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118039     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-469OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  37 in total

1.  Finding paths with the greatest chance of success: enabling and focusing lung cancer screening and cessation in resource-constrained areas.

Authors:  Wiley D Jenkins; David Gilbert; Li-Shiun Chen; Leslie R Carnahan
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09

2.  Rural-Urban Differences in Cancer Incidence and Trends in the United States.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Aimee S James; Wiley D Jenkins; Sonya R Izadi; Amanda J Fogleman; David E Steward; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Rurality, Stage-Stratified Use of Treatment Modalities, and Survival of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Meredith A Ray; Nicholas R Faris; Anna Derrick; Matthew P Smeltzer; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Availability: Lessons From Southwest Virginia.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Taryn E Hassinger; Benjamin D Kozower; Fabian Camacho; Roger T Anderson; Nengliang Yao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Tri Le; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Sarah Zamarripa; Aurelio Rodriguez; Benjamin Barkley; Asha Kandathil; Cecelia Brewington; Keith E Argenbright; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Coronary Artery Calcifications and Cardiac Risk After Radiation Therapy for Stage III Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Kyle Wang; Hayley E Malkin; Nicholas D Patchett; Kevin A Pearlstein; Hillary M Heiling; Sean D McCabe; Allison M Deal; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Mary Oakey; Jeffrey Fenoli; Carrie B Lee; J Larry Klein; Brian C Jensen; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lawrence B Marks; Ashley A Weiner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Comparing Preventable Acute Care Use of Rural Versus Urban Americans: an Observational Study of National Rates During 2008-2017.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Hefei Wen; Ameya Kotwal; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Institutional-Level Differences in Quality and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Resections in the United States.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Helmneh M Sineshaw; Chun Chieh Lin; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Sociodemographic disparities in the management of advanced lung cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jacob Newton Stein; M Patricia Rivera; Ashley Weiner; Narjust Duma; Louise Henderson; Gita Mody; Marjory Charlot
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.005

10.  State-level rurality and cigarette smoking-associated cancer incidence and mortality: Do individual-level trends translate to population-level outcomes?

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Elias M Klemperer; Brian L Sprague; Thomas P Ahern
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.