Literature DB >> 28117775

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles.

Lara D LaDage1, Tracie E Cobb Irvin2, Victoria A Gould2.   

Abstract

Clinical research has leveraged a variety of paradigms to assess cognitive decline, commonly targeting spatial learning and memory abilities. However, interest in the cognitive processes of nonmodel species, typically within an ecological context, has also become an emerging field of study. In particular, interest in the cognitive processes in reptiles is growing although experimental studies on reptilian cognition are sparse. The few reptilian studies that have experimentally tested for spatial learning and memory have used rodent paradigms modified for use in reptiles. However, ecologically important aspects of the physiology and behavior of this taxonomic group must be taken into account when testing for spatially based cognition. Here, we describe modifications of the dry land Barnes maze and associated testing protocol that can improve performance when probing for spatial learning and memory ability in small squamate reptiles. The described paradigm and procedures were successfully used with male side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana), demonstrating that spatial learning and memory can be assessed in this taxonomic group with an ecologically relevant apparatus and protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28117775      PMCID: PMC5351821          DOI: 10.3791/55103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  20 in total

1.  The effects of apparatus design and test procedure on learning and memory performance of C57BL/6J mice on the Barnes maze.

Authors:  Timothy P O'Leary; Richard E Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

3.  Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

Authors:  J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The role of age-specific learning and experience for turtles navigating a changing landscape.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Aaron R Krochmal
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Learning outdoors: male lizards show flexible spatial learning under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Daniel W A Noble; Pau Carazo; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  A role for acetylcholine in spatial memory in turtles.

Authors:  M Petrillo; C A Ritter; A S Powers
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-07

8.  Evaluation of spatial memory of C57BL/6J and CD1 mice in the Barnes maze, the Multiple T-maze and in the Morris water maze.

Authors:  Sudarshan S Patil; Berta Sunyer; Harald Höger; Gert Lubec
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Homing of invasive Burmese pythons in South Florida: evidence for map and compass senses in snakes.

Authors:  Shannon E Pittman; Kristen M Hart; Michael S Cherkiss; Ray W Snow; Ikuko Fujisaki; Brian J Smith; Frank J Mazzotti; Michael E Dorcas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Hippocampal volume and asymmetry in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: Meta-analyses of MRI studies.

Authors:  Feng Shi; Bing Liu; Yuan Zhou; Chunshui Yu; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.