S A Patel1, M-H Chen2, M Loffredo3, A Renshaw4, P W Kantoff5, A V D'Amico3. 1. Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Miami Baptist Hospital, Miami, FL, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of men with PSA failure following initial prostate cancer (PC) therapy stratified by comorbidity is unknown. We investigated the impact that PSA doubling time (DT) and comorbidity had on the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) following PSA failure. METHODS:Between 1995 and 2001, 206 men with unfavorable-risk PC were randomized to receive radiation therapy alone or in combination with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); 108 men experienced PSA failure and formed the study cohort. Cox and Fine-Gray regression analysis was used to determine whether PSA DT was associated with the risk of ACM and PCSM/OCM, respectively, stratified by comorbidity status using a validated metric. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 13.71 years following PSA failure, 81 of the 108 men (75%) died. Longer PSA DT was associated with a decreased risk of PCSM in men with no/minimal (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.65, P=0.001) and moderate/severe comorbidity (AHR 0.014, 95% CI 0.002-0.129, P=0.0002). However, because of the different contributions of the risk of OCM to risk of ACM within comorbidity subgroups, increasing PSA DT was only associated with a decreased risk of ACM in men with no/minimal (AHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, P=0.03) but not moderate/severe comorbidity (AHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.78, P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Both the extent of comorbidity and the PSA DT should be taken into consideration when deciding on appropriate management and/or clinical trial eligibility at the time of PSA failure.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of men with PSA failure following initial prostate cancer (PC) therapy stratified by comorbidity is unknown. We investigated the impact that PSA doubling time (DT) and comorbidity had on the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) following PSA failure. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2001, 206 men with unfavorable-risk PC were randomized to receive radiation therapy alone or in combination with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); 108 men experienced PSA failure and formed the study cohort. Cox and Fine-Gray regression analysis was used to determine whether PSADT was associated with the risk of ACM and PCSM/OCM, respectively, stratified by comorbidity status using a validated metric. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 13.71 years following PSA failure, 81 of the 108 men (75%) died. Longer PSADT was associated with a decreased risk of PCSM in men with no/minimal (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.65, P=0.001) and moderate/severe comorbidity (AHR 0.014, 95% CI 0.002-0.129, P=0.0002). However, because of the different contributions of the risk of OCM to risk of ACM within comorbidity subgroups, increasing PSADT was only associated with a decreased risk of ACM in men with no/minimal (AHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, P=0.03) but not moderate/severe comorbidity (AHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.78, P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Both the extent of comorbidity and the PSADT should be taken into consideration when deciding on appropriate management and/or clinical trial eligibility at the time of PSA failure.
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; James W Denham; Juanita Crook; Ming-Hui Chen; Samuel Z Goldhaber; David S Lamb; David Joseph; Keen-Hun Tai; Shawn Malone; Charles Ludgate; Allison Steigler; Philip W Kantoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janice S H Tan; Charles X Y Goh; Yen Sin Koh; Youquan Li; Jeffrey K L Tuan; Eu Tiong Chua; Terence W K Tan; Michael L C Wang; Lui Shiong Lee; Kae Jack Tay; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Chee Keong Toh; Aaron K T Tong; Winnie W C Lam; Melvin L K Chua Journal: Cancer Biol Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.248