Literature DB >> 28117158

Life cycle assessment of constructed wetland systems for wastewater treatment coupled with microbial fuel cells.

Clara Corbella1, Jaume Puigagut1, Marianna Garfí2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the environmental impact of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) implemented in constructed wetlands (CWs). To this aim a life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out comparing three scenarios: 1) a conventional CW system (without MFC implementation); 2) a CW system coupled with a gravel-based anode MFC, and 3) a CW system coupled with a graphite-based anode MFC. All systems served a population equivalent of 1500 p.e. They were designed to meet the same effluent quality. Since MFCs implemented in CWs improve treatment efficiency, the CWs coupled with MFCs had lower specific area requirement compared to the conventional CW system. The functional unit was 1m3 of wastewater. The LCA was performed with the software SimaPro® 8, using the CML-IA baseline method. The three scenarios considered showed similar environmental performance in all the categories considered, with the exception of Abiotic Depletion Potential. In this impact category, the potential environmental impact of the CW system coupled with a gravel-based anode MFC was around 2 times higher than that generated by the conventional CW system and the CW system coupled with a graphite-based anode MFC. It was attributed to the large amount of less environmentally friendly materials (e.g. metals, graphite) for MFCs implementation, especially in the case of gravel-based anode MFCs. Therefore, the CW system coupled with graphite-based anode MFC appeared as the most environmentally friendly solution which can replace conventional CWs reducing system footprint by up to 20%. An economic assessment showed that this system was around 1.5 times more expensive than the conventional CW system.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constructed wetland; Decentralised wastewater treatment system; Environmental impact assessment; Life cycle assessment; Microbial fuel cells; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28117158     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Cedar Wood-Based Biochar: Properties, Characterization, and Applications as Anodes in Microbial Fuel Cell.

Authors:  Gregory Bataillou; Carine Lee; Virginie Monnier; Tony Gerges; Andrei Sabac; Christian Vollaire; Naoufel Haddour
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Microbial Electrochemically Assisted Treatment Wetlands: Current Flow Density as a Performance Indicator in Real-Scale Systems in Mediterranean and Northern European Locations.

Authors:  Lorena Peñacoba-Antona; Carlos Andres Ramirez-Vargas; Colin Wardman; Alessandro A Carmona-Martinez; Abraham Esteve-Núñez; Diego Paredes; Hans Brix; Carlos Alberto Arias
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 3.  SMFC as a tool for the removal of hydrocarbons and metals in the marine environment: a concise research update.

Authors:  Rosa Anna Nastro; Edvige Gambino; Kuppam Chandrasekhar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Assessing METland® Design and Performance Through LCA: Techno-Environmental Study With Multifunctional Unit Perspective.

Authors:  Lorena Peñacoba-Antona; Jorge Senán-Salinas; Arantxa Aguirre-Sierra; Pedro Letón; Juan José Salas; Eloy García-Calvo; Abraham Esteve-Núñez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.