Steven G Terra1, Kristen Focht2, Melanie Davies3, Juan Frias4, Giuseppe Derosa5, Amanda Darekar6, Gregory Golm7, Jeremy Johnson7, Didier Saur8, Brett Lauring7, Sam Dagogo-Jack9. 1. Pfizer, Andover, Massachusetts. 2. Pfizer, Collegeville, Pennsylvania. 3. Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 4. National Research Institute, Los Angeles, California. 5. University of Pavia and IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy. 6. Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK. 7. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey. 8. Pfizer, Paris, France. 9. University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
AIMS: To conduct a phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 52-week, double-blind, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study with a 26-week, placebo-controlled treatment period (phase A), followed by a 26-week active-controlled treatment period (phase B) in 461 men and women, aged ≥18 years with inadequate glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] concentration 7.0% to 10.5% [53-91 mmol/mol], inclusive) despite diet and exercise. Results from phase A are reported in the present paper. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: At week 26, the placebo-adjusted least squares mean HbA1c changes from baseline were -0.99% and -1.16% for the ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg doses, respectively ( P < .001 for both doses). The odds of having HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) were significantly greater in the ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg groups compared with the placebo group. Both doses of ertugliflozin significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour postprandial glucose levels and body weight. The placebo-adjusted differences in changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure were not statistically significant. A higher incidence of genital mycotic infections occurred in men and women treated with ertugliflozin compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between treatments in the proportion of participants with symptomatic hypoglycaemia or adverse events associated with urinary tract infection or hypovolaemia. CONCLUSIONS:Ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg treatment for 26 weeks provides effective glycaemic control, reduces body weight and is generally well tolerated, when used as monotherapy.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To conduct a phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 52-week, double-blind, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study with a 26-week, placebo-controlled treatment period (phase A), followed by a 26-week active-controlled treatment period (phase B) in 461 men and women, aged ≥18 years with inadequate glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] concentration 7.0% to 10.5% [53-91 mmol/mol], inclusive) despite diet and exercise. Results from phase A are reported in the present paper. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: At week 26, the placebo-adjusted least squares mean HbA1c changes from baseline were -0.99% and -1.16% for the ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg doses, respectively ( P < .001 for both doses). The odds of having HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) were significantly greater in the ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg groups compared with the placebo group. Both doses of ertugliflozin significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour postprandial glucose levels and body weight. The placebo-adjusted differences in changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure were not statistically significant. A higher incidence of genital mycotic infections occurred in men and women treated with ertugliflozin compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between treatments in the proportion of participants with symptomatic hypoglycaemia or adverse events associated with urinary tract infection or hypovolaemia. CONCLUSIONS:Ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg treatment for 26 weeks provides effective glycaemic control, reduces body weight and is generally well tolerated, when used as monotherapy.
Authors: E G Dorsey-Treviño; J G González-González; N Alvarez-Villalobos; V González-Nava; B M Contreras-Garza; A Díaz González-Colmenero; G Rodríguez-Tamez; F J Barrera-Flores; A M Farrell; V M Montori; R Rodriguez-Gutierrez Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Jie Liu; Roy Eldor; Guillermo Amorin; Jeremy Johnson; Darcy Hille; Yuqin Liao; Susan Huyck; Gregory Golm; Steven G Terra; James P Mancuso; Samuel S Engel; Brett Lauring Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Priscilla Hollander; Jie Liu; Julie Hill; Jeremy Johnson; Zhi Wei Jiang; Gregory Golm; Susan Huyck; Steven G Terra; James P Mancuso; Samuel S Engel; Brett Lauring Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: George Grunberger; Sarah Camp; Jeremy Johnson; Susan Huyck; Steven G Terra; James P Mancuso; Zhi Wei Jiang; Gregory Golm; Samuel S Engel; Brett Lauring Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.945