Literature DB >> 2811662

Telescoping is not time compression: a model of the dating of autobiographical events.

D C Rubin, A D Baddeley.   

Abstract

A model of telescoping is proposed that assumes no systematic errors in dating. Rather, the overestimation of recent occurrences of events is based on the combination of three factors: (1) Retention is greater for recent events; (2) errors in dating, though unbiased, increase linearly with the time since the dated event; and (3) intrusions often occur from events outside the period being asked about, but such intrusions do not come from events that have not yet occurred. In Experiment 1, we found that recall for colloquia fell markedly over a 2-year interval, the magnitude of errors in psychologists' dating of the colloquia increased at a rate of .4 days per day of delay, and the direction of the dating error was toward the middle of the interval. In Experiment 2, the model used the retention function and dating errors from the first study to predict the distribution of the actual dates of colloquia recalled as being within a 5-month period. In Experiment 3, the findings of the first study were replicated with colloquia given by, instead of for, the subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2811662     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  A decision-making theory of visual detection.

Authors:  W P TANNER; J A SWETS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics.

Authors:  W A Wickelgren
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-07

3.  Semantic memory content in permastore: fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school.

Authors:  H P Bahrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-03

4.  Telescoping in dating naturally occurring events.

Authors:  C P Thompson; J J Skowronski; D J Lee
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

5.  Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys.

Authors:  N M Bradburn; L J Rips; S K Shevell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmark events.

Authors:  E F Loftus; W Marburger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-03

7.  Memory for unique personal events: the roommate study.

Authors:  C P Thompson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-07
  7 in total
  25 in total

1.  What happens if you retest autobiographical memory 10 years on?

Authors:  C D Burt; S Kemp; M Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  An associative theory of estimating past dates and past prices.

Authors:  S Kemp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

3.  Time scale similarity and long-term memory for autobiographical events.

Authors:  Bryan J Moreton; Geoff Ward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

4.  The role of guessing and boundaries on date estimation biases.

Authors:  Peter James Lee; Norman R Brown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

5.  Retrospective duration estimation of public events.

Authors:  C D Burt; S Kemp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-05

6.  Positional uncertainty in long-term memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

7.  Evidence of telescoping in regular smoking onset age.

Authors:  Brianna C Bright; Julia N Soulakova
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  A year's memories: the calendar effect in autobiographical recall.

Authors:  M A Kurbat; S K Shevell; L J Rips
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

Review 9.  Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Sharda Umanath
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Relations among acute and chronic nicotine administration, short-term memory, and tactics of data analysis.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.