Literature DB >> 28116488

Antibiofilm effects of topical corticosteroids and intranasal saline in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps depend on bacterial species and their biofilm-forming capacity.

Ivana Cirkovic1, Bojan Pavlovic2,3, Dragana D Bozic4, Ana Jotic2,3, Ljubica Bakic5, Jovica Milovanovic2,3.   

Abstract

Microbial biofilms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Intranasal application of corticosteroids and saline is a reliable option for their management. The aim of our study was to evaluate in vitro antibiofilm effects of corticosteroids and isotonic and hypertonic nasal saline in CRSwNP patients. The sinus mucosal specimens were harvested from the ethmoid cavity of 48 patients with CRSwNP and further subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining and microbiology analysis. The biofilm-forming capacity of isolated bacterial strains was detected by microtiter-plate method and the effects of therapeutic doses of mometasone, fluticasone, isotonic and hypertonic saline on biofilm production were investigated. Bacterial strains were isolated in 42 (87.5%) patients: one organism in 34 (80.9%) and two organisms in 8 (19.1%). Staphylococcus epidermidis (34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (28%) were the most prevalent bacteria in biofilms of CRSwNP patients. Corticosteroids and saline solutions significantly reduced biofilm formation (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) with better efficacy of fluticasone and isotonic nasal saline. Treatment with fluticasone, mometasone, isotonic and hypertonic nasal saline completely prevented biofilm production in 66, 50, 84 and 38% of bacterial strains, respectively. The most significant density reduction was observed in biofilm formed by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae compared to other bacterial species (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). The antibiofilm effects of corticosteroids and saline solutions also greatly depended on bacterial biomass (p < 0.05), with the most significant effect on high compared to small amount of formed biofilm. The topical steroids and nasal saline are shown to be potent antibiofilm agents in patients with CRSwNP. The effects of tested compounds depend on bacterial species and volume of formed biofilm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis; Corticosteroids; Nasal saline

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28116488     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4454-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  23 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Biofilm detection with hematoxylin-eosin staining.

Authors:  Christian J Hochstim; Judy Yujin Choi; Derek Lowe; Rizwan Masood; Dale H Rice
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-05

Review 4.  Biofilms.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Suh; Vijay Ramakrishnan; James N Palmer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Demonstration of biofilm in human bacterial chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Berrylin J Ferguson; Donna B Stolz
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

6.  Cousins, siblings, or copies: the genomics of recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Amanda Drilling; Geoffrey W Coombs; Hui-leen Tan; Julie C Pearson; Samuel Boase; Alkis Psaltis; Peter Speck; Sarah Vreugde; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 7.  Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.

Authors:  Rodney M Donlan; J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Role of bacterial and fungal biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Andrew Foreman; Sam Boase; Alkis Psaltis; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 9.  The role of biofilms in otolaryngologic infections: update 2007.

Authors:  J Christopher Post; N Luisa Hiller; Laura Nistico; Paul Stoodley; Garth D Ehrlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 10.  The relationship of biofilms to chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Darrell H Hunsaker; Jeff G Leid
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  4 in total

1.  An analysis of the histomorphometric and clinical significance of mucosal biofilm in tonsil tissue of the children with a history of recurrent/chronic tonsillitis in both the mother and father.

Authors:  Fuat Bulut; Alev Cumbul; Ayse Sezim Safak
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Understanding the Role of Biofilms and Superantigens in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Ivy W Maina; Neil N Patel; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 3.  Chronic Rhinosinusitis, S. aureus Biofilm and Secreted Products, Inflammatory Responses, and Disease Severity.

Authors:  Gohar Shaghayegh; Clare Cooksley; Mahnaz Ramezanpour; Peter-John Wormald; Alkis James Psaltis; Sarah Vreugde
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 4.  Staphylococcus aureus Infection and Persistence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Focus on Leukocidin ED.

Authors:  Dimitri Poddighe; Luca Vangelista
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.