| Literature DB >> 28116292 |
Na Shi1, Chongtian Zhu1, Liying Li2.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the recovery of motor function in rats through the silent information regulator factor 2-related enzyme 1 (Sirt1) signal pathway-mediated rehabilitation training. Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MACO) was used to induce ischemia/reperfusion injury. The rats were subjected to no treatment (model), rehabilitation training (for 21 days), resveratrol (5 mg/kg for 21 days), and rehabilitation training plus resveratrol treatment. 24 h later, They were assessed for neurobehavioral score and motor behavior score and expression of brain derived-nerve neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB). Compared with sham group, models had significantly higher neurobehavioral scores, balance beam, and rotary stick scores. Compared with the model group, rats in rehabilitation training and resveratrol groups had significantly reduced scores. Compared with rehabilitation training or resveratrol treatment alone, rehabilitation plus resveratrol further reduced the scores significantly. The percentage of cells expressing BDNF and TrkB and expression levels of BDNF and TrkB were similar between the model and sham groups, significantly increased in rehabilitation training and resveratrol groups, and further increased in rehabilitation training plus resveratrol group. These results indicate that rehabilitation raining plus resveratrol can significantly improve the recovery of motor function in rats after cerebral ischemic injury, which is likely related to the upregulation of the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28116292 PMCID: PMC5223001 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1732163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Neurobehavioral scores of rats following middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion injury, rehabilitation training, and resveratrol treatment.
| Groups | Days after the surgery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
| Sham | 0A | 0A | 0A | 0A |
| Model | 2.38 ± 0.24 | 1.79 ± 0.18 | 1.37 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.10 |
| Rehabilitation training | 2.01 ± 0.15 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.03##,D |
| Resveratrol | 2.00 ± 0.12 | 0.87 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.03##,D |
| Rehabilitation training plus resveratrol | 1.96 ± 0.17 | 0.56 | 0.40 ± 0.04##,++,C | 0.12 ± 0.01##,++,D |
∗∗, ##, and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively. Numbers labelled with different capital letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.01) based on repeated measures ANOVA.
Balance beam scores of rats following middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion injury, rehabilitation training, and resveratrol treatment.
| Groups | Days after the surgery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
| Sham | 1.00 ± 0.00A | 1.00 ± 0.00A | 1.00 ± 0.00A | 1.00 ± 0.00A |
| Model | 5.08 ± 0.52 | 2.79 ± 0.28 | 2.24 ± 0.3 | 1.69 ± 0.17 |
| Rehabilitation training | 5.01 ± 0.50 | 1.83 ± 0.19 | 1.48 ± 0.15 | 1.19 ± 0.12 |
| Resveratrol | 5.00 ± 0.52 | 1.85 ± 0.18 | 1.49 ± 0.15 | 1.20 ± 0.12 |
| Rehabilitation training plus resveratrol | 4.98 ± 0.17 | 1.45 ± 0.15 | 1.23 ± 0.12 | 1.06 ± 0.10##,++,D |
∗∗, ##, and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively. Numbers labelled with different capital letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.01) based on repeated measures ANOVA.
Rotary stick scores of rats following middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion injury, rehabilitation training, and resveratrol treatment.
| Groups | Days after the surgery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
| Sham | 0A | 0A | 0A | 0A |
| Model | 2.28 ± 0.22 | 1.95 ± 0.19 | 1.46 ± 0.13 | 1.12 ± 0.11 |
| Rehabilitation training | 2.21 ± 0.20 | 1.42 ± 0.13 | 1.07 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.05 |
| Resveratrol | 2.20 ± 0.22 | 1.43 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 0.53 ± 0.05 |
| Rehabilitation training plus resveratrol | 2.17 ± 0.21 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 0.90 ± 0.09 | 0.36 ± 0.04 |
∗∗, ##, and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively. Numbers labelled with different capital letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.01) based on repeated measures ANOVA.
Positive percentages of BDNF and TrkB in brain tissue of following middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion injury, rehabilitation training, and resveratrol treatment.
| Groups | Positive percentage of BDNF | Positive percentage of TrkB |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 28.17 ± 2.82 | 18.90 ± 1.89 |
| Model | 29.86 ± 2.99 | 20.17 ± 0.21 |
| Rehabilitation training | 42.35 ± 4.40## | 38.47 ± 3.85## |
| Resveratrol | 42.29 ± 4.23## | 38.49 ± 3.85## |
| Rehabilitation training plus resveratrol | 68.56 ± 6.26##,++ | 56.19 ± 5.62##,++ |
## and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively.
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry staining of brain cells for BDNF (×400). (a) Sham operation group; (b) model group; (c) rehabilitation training group; (d) resveratrol group; (e) rehabilitation training plus resveratrol group.
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry staining of brain cells for TrkB (×400). (a) Sham operation group; (b) model group; (c) rehabilitation training group; (d) resveratrol group; (e) rehabilitation training plus resveratrol group.
Figure 3BDNF and TrkB protein expression in brain tissues 21 days after the operation. (a) Representative Western blot; (b) relative protein content. ## and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively.
Figure 4PCR analysis of BDNF and TrkB mRNA expression in brain tissues. (a) Electrophoresis of PCR product; (b) relative mRNA levels. ## and ++ denote values with P < 0.01 versus sham, model, and rehabilitation training or resveratrol, respectively.