Literature DB >> 28116249

Proliferation, angiogenesis and differentiation related markers in compact and follicular-compact thyroid carcinomas in dogs.

P Pessina1, V A Castillo2, D César3, I Sartore1, A Meikle1.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemical markers (IGF-1, IGF-1R, VEGF, FGF-2, RARα and RXR) were evaluated in healthy canine thyroid glands (n=8) and in follicular-compact (n=8) and compact thyroid carcinomas (n=8). IGF-1, IGF-1R and VEGF expression was higher in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of compact carcinoma than in healthy glands (P < 0.05). Compared to follicular-compact carcinoma, compact carcinoma had higher IGF-1R expression in fibroblasts, and higher FGF-2 expression in endothelial cells (P < 0.05). RARα expression was higher in endothelial cells of compact carcinoma than in those of other groups (P < 0.05). The upregulation of these proliferation- and angiogenesis-related factors in endothelial cells and/or fibroblasts and not in follicular cells of compact carcinoma compared to healthy glands supports the relevance of stromal cells in cancer progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine; Histology; Immunohistochemistry; Thyroid carcinoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 28116249      PMCID: PMC5223283          DOI: 10.4314/ovj.v6i3.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Vet J        ISSN: 2218-6050


Introduction

Similar to humans, thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy in dogs and the leading cause of death among endocrine cancers (Barber, 2007). Ninety percent of canine thyroid tumours are carcinomas, and 16–38%, and even up to 60%, of patients show evidence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis (Wucherer and Wilke, 2010; Campos et al., 2012). In dogs, the most frequent thyroid tumour types are derived from follicular epithelial cells, and the most common histological patterns are follicular, follicular-compact and compact (Ramos-Vara et al., 2002; Nadeau and Kitchell, 2011). Most canine thyroid tumours are well to moderately differentiated (Klein et al., 1995). Although surgery is often successful in the early stages of the disease, unsatisfactory results are obtained in advanced tumours. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms and intracellular networks associated with oncogenesis may help discover new therapeutic options for these malignancies (Malaguarnera et al., 2012). Alterations in the expression of growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2, and their receptors, play a role in the progression of thyroid cancer in humans and dogs (de Araujo-Filho et al., 2009; Redler et al., 2013; Campos et al., 2014). The activation of the IGF system is associated with the pathogenesis of a variety of human neoplasias because of the mitogenic and anti-apoptotic properties of its cognate receptor (Vella et al., 2001; Ciampolillo et al., 2007). IGF-1, a potent mitogen in many cell types, promotes the progression of mitosis via the induction of DNA synthesis and has long-term effects on cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (Jones and Clemmons, 1995). Experimental evidence suggests that IGF-1 plays a significant role in the transformation, infiltrative growth and metastasis of tumour cells (LeRoith and Roberts, 2003; Liu and Brown, 2011). Moreover, IGF-1/IGF-1R are overexpressed in some types of thyroid carcinomas in humans, and it is correlated with poor prognosis (Liu et al., 2013). In the absence of vascular support, tumours may become necrotic or even apoptotic (Holmgren et al., 1995). New growth in the vascular network is important because the proliferation, as well as metastatic spread, of cancer cells depends on an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients, and the removal of waste products (Nishida et al., 2006). In addition, tumour angiogenesis is controlled by positive and negative modulators produced by neoplastic, stromal and tumour-infiltrating cells (Carmeliet and Jain, 2000). Studies showed that vascular tumour markers, such as VEGF expression, are increased in association with poor outcome in some canine compact tumours (Restucci et al., 2003). VEGF is essential for the growth of new vessels under normal physiological conditions as well as in tumour cells, and it plays an important role in the development of distant metastases (Lin and Chao, 2005). In dogs, VEGF is expressed at higher levels in endothelial cells of canine thyroid glands with carcinoma than in those of healthy glands, which is consistent with the higher number of blood vessels and cell density (Campos et al., 2014; Pessina et al., 2014). FGF-2 is also implicated in abnormal human thyroid growth, both as a potential follicular cell mitogen and as a stimulator of thyroid endothelial cell growth. Reports on FGF-2 levels in thyroid carcinoma are contradictory (Kondo et al., 2007), and its expression may depend on the degree of differentiation (Boelaert et al., 2003). Differentiating factors redirect cells toward their normal phenotype and may reverse or suppress carcinogenesis (Miller, 1998). Retinoids are natural or synthetic derivatives of vitamin A that modulate cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis (de Mello Souza et al., 2014). In dogs, retinoids are used to treat various types of cancer such as cutaneous lymphoma, mast cell tumours and corticotroph adenoma of the pituitary (White et al., 1993; Miyajima et al., 2006; Ohashi et al., 2006; Castillo et al., 2006; Castillo and Gallelli, 2010), and recently in thyroid carcinoma (Castillo et al., 2016). The action of retinoic acid is mediated by retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and the retinoid X receptors (RXRs) (Kasimanickam et al., 2013). Both receptors are expressed in cutaneous lymphoma in dogs (de Mello Souza et al., 2010); however, their expression in the thyroid gland has not been described to date. Based on evidence showing that primary tumours are composed of a multitude of stromal cell types in addition to cancerous cells (Tlsty and Coussens, 2006), we investigated different markers (VEGF, FGF-2, IGF-1, IGF-1R, RARα and RXR) in compact and follicular-compact canine thyroid carcinomas.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design

All experiments were performed in accordance with the regulations of the Animal Experimentation Committees of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, and the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Tissue samples

Tissue samples were collected from the Endocrinology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and the Veterinary Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uruguay. Canine tissue samples were selected as follows: normal thyroid tissues were obtained from dogs that had been euthanised for reasons unrelated to thyroid disease (traumatized or aggressive patients) and had histopathologically normal thyroid glands (healthy group, n = 8); thyroid follicular carcinomas were obtained postsurgically (carcinoma group, n = 16). Tumours were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Haematoxylin and eosin stained specimens were classified into two categories, namely, follicular-compact carcinoma (n = 8) and compact carcinoma (n = 8), according to the predominant histological pattern and following established criteria for thyroid neoplasms. Classification of thyroid tumours according to thyroglobulin and calcitonin immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (Patnaik and Lieberman, 1991); all tumours included in this study were positive for the former and negative for the latter. All samples were processed in the Laboratory of Nuclear Techniques, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uruguay.

Immunohistochemistry

Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemistry. Immunoreactivity against VEGF, FGF-2, IGF-1, IGF-1R, RARα, RXR, thyroglobulin and calcitonin was assessed in transverse 5 μm sections of healthy thyroid gland and thyroid carcinoma specimens using the avidin-biotin peroxidase immunohistochemical technique, as previously described (Pessina et al., 2014). Paraffin embedded tissue sections were de-waxed and re-hydrated, and antigen retrieval was performed. Sections were pretreated in a microwave oven at 900 W in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 9 min, and then allowed to cool for 20 min. After washing in buffer (0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4), non-specific endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by exposure to 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min at room temperature. After another wash in buffer (10 min), sections were blocked in normal horse or goat serum diluted in PBS (Vectastain, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 30 min at room temperature in a humidified chamber. Sections were incubated with the primary antibodies for one hour a humidity chamber at room temperature (Table 1).
Table 1

Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry.

AntibodyAntibody NameAntibody TypeDilution
CalcitoninA 0576[a]Rabbit polyclonal1:1000
Thyroglobulinsc-365997[b]Mouse monoclonal1:75
VEGFsc-152[b]Rabbit polyclonal1:200
FGF-2sc-79[b]Rabbit polyclonal1:200
IGF-1sc-1422[b]Goat polyclonal1:50
IGF-1Rab 5497[c]Rabbit polyclonal1:50
RARαsc-551[b]Rabbit polyclonal1:100
RXRsc-831[b]Rabbit polyclonal1:100

Dako, Glostrup, Denmark.

Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Dallas, TX.

Abcam, Cambridge, USA.

Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry. Dako, Glostrup, Denmark. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Dallas, TX. Abcam, Cambridge, USA. Negative control immunolabeling was performed for each receptor by replacing the primary antibody with non-immune IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), diluted 1:100 in PBS. After primary antibody binding, sections were incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody (horse anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgG; Vector Laboratories), diluted 1:200 in normal horse (thyroglobulin and IGF-1) or goat serum (the remaining antibodies). A Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) was used for the detection of all proteins. The site of the bound enzyme was visualised by 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB), a chromogen that produces a brown insoluble precipitate when incubated with the enzyme, in H2O2 using a DAB kit (Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin and dehydrated before mounting with Entellan® (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). For each protein, all samples were analysed using same immunohistochemical assay.

Image analysis

Cell density (number of cells/field) and number of blood vessels were counted in 15 images captured from each histological section at 40× magnification. Three cell types, namely, follicular cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts, were evaluated in the same images. Immunolabeling of the nucleus or cytoplasm was scored as negative (-), faint (+), moderate (++) or intense (+++) by two independent observers who were blinded to the treatment groups (Pessina et al., 2014). The average labeling intensity was calculated as (1 × n1) + (2 × n2) + (3 × n3), where n is the number of cells in each field exhibiting faint (n1), moderate (n2) and intense (n3) labeling (Boos et al., 1996). The average of the abovementioned variables in the 15 images captured from each histological section was used for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Univariate analyses were performed on all variables to identify outliers and to verify the normality of residuals. Antigen immunolabeling intensity was evaluated by analysis of variance using a mixed model (Statistical Analysis System, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The statistical model used to assess labeling intensity included observer effects, animal group (healthy thyroid gland, follicular-compact carcinoma and compact carcinoma), and cell type (follicular cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells) and their interactions. Cell density was analysed by PROC MIXED (SAS, V9.0) with the animal group included in the model. Since blood vessels were not detected in the images of most healthy animals (7/8), the number of blood vessels was analysed by PROC GENMOD using a binomial distribution (presence or not of vessels) including the animal group in the model. Data are presented as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Number of blood vessels and cell density

Cell density was higher in compact carcinomas and follicular-compact carcinomas than in healthy glands (cells per field: 288 ± 24, 221 ± 24 and 142 ± 24, respectively, P < 0.03). Moreover, the number of cells per field tended to be higher in compact carcinomas than in follicular-compact carcinomas (P = 0.06). A significant group effect was observed regarding the number of blood vessels (P = 0.007), with a greater number of blood vessels observed in thyroid follicular-compact carcinomas than in healthy thyroid tissue (P = 0.01), and in compact carcinomas than in the healthy group (P < 0.1), although the latter did not reach statistical significance.

Protein localisation

Positive immunolabeling for IGF-1, IGF-1R, VEGF, FGF-2, RARα and RXR was observed in the cytoplasm in all cell types analysed (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). Five carcinoma samples (two compact and three follicular-compact) had positive labeling for nuclear IGF-1R, although the percentage of positive cells was too low for statistical analysis. Nuclear RARα and RXR labeling was also detected in follicular cells in eight (three compact and five follicular-compact) and two (one compact and one follicular-compact) carcinoma samples. For all assays, no immunolabeling was observed when the primary antibody was replaced by non-specific IgG.
Fig. 1

Immunoreactivity of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1, A) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R, B) in thyroid compact carcinoma. Cytoplasmic labeling in follicular cells is shown. The asterisk (*) shows expression in healthy thyroid tissue. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×.

Fig. 2

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2, B) cytoplasmic labeling in thyroid compact carcinoma. The asterisk (*) shows expression in healthy thyroid tissues. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×.

Fig. 3

Cytoplasmic immunolabeling of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα, A) and retinoid X receptor (RXR, B) in thyroid compact carcinoma. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×.

Immunoreactivity of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1, A) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R, B) in thyroid compact carcinoma. Cytoplasmic labeling in follicular cells is shown. The asterisk (*) shows expression in healthy thyroid tissue. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2, B) cytoplasmic labeling in thyroid compact carcinoma. The asterisk (*) shows expression in healthy thyroid tissues. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×. Cytoplasmic immunolabeling of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα, A) and retinoid X receptor (RXR, B) in thyroid compact carcinoma. All images were captured at a magnification of 400×. Overall, IGF-1 and IGF-1R labeling intensities were higher in compact carcinoma than in healthy thyroid tissues, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09 and P = 0.07, respectively). IGF-1 and IGF-1R expression was higher in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of compact carcinomas than in those of healthy thyroid tissues (P < 0.05), whereas no differences were observed for follicular cells (Fig. 4A and B).
Fig. 4

Immunolabeling intensity of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1, A) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05.

Immunolabeling intensity of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1, A) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05. No differences were observed between compact and follicular-compact carcinomas, except in fibroblasts, where compact carcinomas showed higher IGF-1R labeling intensity (P < 0.05). Overall, VEGF expression was higher in compact carcinomas than in healthy thyroid tissues (P < 0.05) and follicular-compact carcinomas (P < 0.1). Stronger labeling for VEGF was detected in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of compact carcinomas than in those of normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5A). No differences in FGF-2 labeling intensity were detected in follicular cells and fibroblasts, whereas endothelial cells of compact carcinomas showed higher FGF-2 immunolabeling than the other two groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 5

Immunolabeling intensity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05.

Immunolabeling intensity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05. In endothelial cells, RARα immunolabeling was higher in compact carcinomas than in the other two groups (P < 0.01). An altered pattern of RARα expression in different cells types according to group was observed; a stronger labeling in follicular cells than fibroblasts and endothelial cells of healthy glands was found (P < 0.05), whereas no differences according to cells types in follicular compact carcinoma were observed, and endothelial cells presented greater RARα labeling than fibroblasts in compact carcinoma (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6A). Similar profile of RXR expression was observed, with stronger labeling in follicular cells than fibroblasts and endothelial cells of healthy glands (P < 0.05), whereas RXR expression in both types of carcinomas did not differ according to cell type (Fig. 6B).
Fig. 6

Immunolabeling intensity of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα, A) and retinoid X receptor (RXR, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05.

Immunolabeling intensity of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα, A) and retinoid X receptor (RXR, B). Data are expressed as the least square mean ± pooled S.E.M. Different letters within the same cell type indicate differences, P < 0.05.

Discussion

Most canine thyroid tumours arise from the follicular epithelium and are classified as follicular, compact or a mixture of the two patterns (follicular-compact) (Barber, 2007). As reported previously (Pessina et al., 2014), cell density and the number of blood vessels were higher in thyroid carcinoma tissues than in healthy glands. Cell density was increased in compact carcinomas when compared to follicular-compact carcinomas, which is consistent with their corresponding histological classification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing simultaneous detection of immunoreactive IGF-1/IGF-1R in healthy and carcinomatous thyroid glands in dogs. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity of both factors was observed in follicular cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, as reported previously for other cancers in dogs (Buishand et al., 2012; Maniscalco et al., 2014). In carcinomas, a portion of thyroid follicular cells had positive immunolabeling for nuclear IGF-1R, which is consistent with the findings of Sarfstein et al. (2012), who described the translocation of IGF-1R to the nucleus in breast cancer cells and identified a novel mechanism of IGF-1R gene autoregulation. In the present study, IGF-1 and IGF-1R labelling intensity was higher in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of compact carcinoma than in those of healthy thyroid tissues, while follicular-compact carcinoma had intermediate labelling intensity. These findings are consistent with human studies, such as the report by Vella et al. (2001), who showed that IGF-1 and its receptor are overexpressed in thyroid cancer, suggesting that IGF-1R is activated in an autocrine/paracrine manner. The simultaneous increase of IGF-1 and IGF-1R expression in the stroma (fibroblasts and endothelial cells) supports the existence of crosstalk between these cell types; this can lead to the activation of proliferation signals and/or facilitate nutrient access, thus contributing to tumour growth (Bissell and Radisky, 2001; Gribben et al., 2010). These factors were expressed at an intermediate level in follicular-compact carcinomas, which is consistent with the degree of differentiation of this type of tumour compared with compact carcinoma. Indeed, we have recently shown (Castillo et al., 2016) that thyroid follicular compact carcinomas had a greater time to recurrence than compact carcinomas in dogs. In the present study, we showed that the pattern of expression of VEGF was similar to that of IGF-1/IGF-1R in the different groups, as demonstrated by the upregulation of VEGF expression in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of compact carcinoma. The upregulation of VEGF in endothelial cells in compact carcinoma when compared to the healthy thyroid tissue was consistent with the findings of our previous study (Pessina et al., 2014). This is in agreement with Campos et al. (2014) that suggested that VEGF may play an important role in the progression of canine thyroid cancer. Our present results showed that FGF-2 expression was higher in endothelial cells of compact carcinoma than in those of healthy glands or follicular-compact glands. These data were consistent with the pattern of VEGF expression in the same cell type, and support the fact that VEGF stimulates endothelial cells to produce FGF-2, which further enhances angiogenesis (Pallares et al., 2006). Overall, data suggest a positive feedback loop between VEGF and FGF-2 that contributes to tumour progression, despite the higher efficacy of the VEGF system for neovascularization compared to FGF-2 as reported previously (Giavazzi et al., 2003). In the present study, no differences in follicular cell expression of IGF-1/IGF-1R, VEGF and FGF-2 were found among groups, whereas the expression of these factors in stromal cells differed. Tumour progression is promoted by crosstalk between the tumour and its surrounding supporting tissue either via cell-to-cell contact, or mediated by secreted molecules (Bouziges et al., 1991). Indeed, the stroma itself can trigger tumour development (Bissell and Radisky, 2001), and one hypothesis on oncogenesis is based on stromal cell functionality, despite the fact that the mechanisms by which tumour and stromal cells co-evolve remain unclear (Gribben et al., 2010). The expression of RARα and RXR in healthy thyroid glands and thyroid carcinomas in dogs has not been reported previously. In humans, the expression of these retinoic receptors in healthy thyroid tissue, thyroid cell lines, and in thyroid adenomas and carcinomas has been reported (Hoftijzer et al., 2009); however, the expression of these receptors in dogs has only been described in lymphoma, melanoma and osteosarcoma (Miyajima et al., 2006; Ohashi et al., 2006; de Mello Souza et al., 2010, 2014). In the present study, RARα expression in follicular cells did not differ in carcinomas and healthy thyroid glands. However, endothelial cells of compact carcinomas showed higher expression of RARα than those of the other groups (healthy and follicular-compact carcinomas), and further studies are needed to help our understanding of the role of this receptor in carcinoma progression. Retinoic receptor expression in thyroid carcinoma is consistent with our recent study (Castillo et al., 2016) in which isotretinoin 9-cis (RA9-cis) treatment increased time of recurrence and survival time in dogs with follicular-compact and compact thyroid carcinoma when compared to doxorubicin after surgery. Miyajima et al. (2006) showed that in canine masts cells, RARα expression was positively correlated with response to retinoic acid treatment. Because the present study did not test all isoforms of RXR, these data should be considered preliminary. Indeed, Haugen et al. (2004) showed that while RXRγ was expressed in different cell lines of thyroid human tumours, it was not expressed in normal thyroid tissue. Moreover, none of the RXR isoforms are expressed in canine non-tumoural lymphocytes, whereas RXRγ is expressed in 78% of tumour T cells (de Mello Souza et al., 2014). In conclusion, factors related to proliferation and angiogenesis were expressed at higher levels in fibroblasts and/or endothelial cells of compact carcinomas than in those of healthy glands, with mostly intermediate expression in follicular-compact carcinomas, suggesting a role of stromal cells in tumour progression.
  46 in total

1.  Pituitary tumor transforming gene and fibroblast growth factor-2 expression: potential prognostic indicators in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  K Boelaert; C J McCabe; L A Tannahill; N J L Gittoes; R L Holder; J C Watkinson; A R Bradwell; M C Sheppard; J A Franklyn
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  Vascular endothelial growth factor in thyroid cancers.

Authors:  Jen-Der Lin; Tzu-Chieh Chao
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Detection of retinoid receptors in non-neoplastic canine lymph nodes and in lymphoma.

Authors:  Carlos H de Mello Souza; Victor E O Valli; Barbara E Kitchell
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Immunohistochemical detection of thyroid transcription factor-1, thyroglobulin, and calcitonin in canine normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic thyroid gland.

Authors:  J A Ramos-Vara; M A Miller; G C Johnson; L W Pace
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.221

5.  Gross, histologic, cytochemical, and immunocytochemical study of medullary thyroid carcinoma in sixteen dogs.

Authors:  A K Patnaik; P H Lieberman
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.221

6.  Use of isotretinoin and etretinate for the treatment of benign cutaneous neoplasia and cutaneous lymphoma in dogs.

Authors:  S D White; R A Rosychuk; K V Scott; A L Trettien; L Jonas; P Denerolle
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Semiquantitative immunohistochemical marker staining and localization in canine thyroid carcinoma and normal thyroid gland.

Authors:  P Pessina; V Castillo; I Sartore; J Borrego; A Meikle
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.613

8.  Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression.

Authors:  L Holmgren; M S O'Reilly; J Folkman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  The IGF-I axis in thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  A Ciampolillo; C De Tullio; E Perlino; E Maiorano
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  The insulin and igf-I pathway in endocrine glands carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Roberta Malaguarnera; Alaide Morcavallo; Antonino Belfiore
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.