When related species meet upon postglacial range expansion, hybrid zones are frequently formed. Theory predicts that such zones may move over the landscape until equilibrium conditions are reached. One hybrid zone observed to be moving in historical times (1950-1979) is that of the pond-breeding salamanders Triturus cristatus and Triturus marmoratus in western France. We identified the ecological correlates of the species hybrid zone as elevation, forestation, and hedgerows favoring the more terrestrial T. marmoratus and pond density favoring the more aquatic T. cristatus. The past movement of the zone of ca. 30 km over three decades has probably been driven by the drastic postwar reduction of the "bocage" hedgerow landscape, favoring T. cristatus over T. marmoratus. No further hybrid zone movement was observed from 1979 to the present. To explain the changing dynamics of the hybrid zone, we propose that it stalled, either because an equilibrium was found at an altitude of ca. 140 m a.s.l. or due to pond loss and decreased population densities. While we cannot rule out the former explanation, we found support for the latter. Under agricultural intensification, ponds in the study area are lost at an unprecedented rate of 5.5% per year, so that remaining Triturus populations are increasingly isolated, hampering dispersal and further hybrid zone movement.
When related species meet upon postglacial range expansion, hybrid zones are frequently formed. Theory predicts that such zones may move over the landscape until equilibrium conditions are reached. One hybrid zone observed to be moving in historical times (1950-1979) is that of the pond-breeding salamanders Triturus cristatus and Triturus marmoratus in western France. We identified the ecological correlates of the species hybrid zone as elevation, forestation, and hedgerows favoring the more terrestrial T. marmoratus and pond density favoring the more aquatic T. cristatus. The past movement of the zone of ca. 30 km over three decades has probably been driven by the drastic postwar reduction of the "bocage" hedgerow landscape, favoring T. cristatus over T. marmoratus. No further hybrid zone movement was observed from 1979 to the present. To explain the changing dynamics of the hybrid zone, we propose that it stalled, either because an equilibrium was found at an altitude of ca. 140 m a.s.l. or due to pond loss and decreased population densities. While we cannot rule out the former explanation, we found support for the latter. Under agricultural intensification, ponds in the study area are lost at an unprecedented rate of 5.5% per year, so that remaining Triturus populations are increasingly isolated, hampering dispersal and further hybrid zone movement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Triturus; amphibians; enclave; habitat preferences; mosaic hybrid zone; newt; pond loss; species distribution model
The interactions that determine a species' position in the ecosystem are many and include predation, competition, disease vectors, and many others. When species expand their geographical range, such as following a glacial period, they encounter new habitats and run into species previously unknown to them. If a species encounters another closely related species, the two may interbreed, possibly leading to offspring in a more or less narrow hybrid zone. At least 10% of animal species and 25% of plant species, mostly the youngest ones, are involved in hybridization and potential introgression with other species (Mallet, 2005). Zones where related species meet, mate, and hybridize are particularly frequent in areas of postglacial colonization (Hewitt, 1999; Taberlet, Fumagalli, Wust‐Saucy, & Cosson, 1998). Hybrid zones are important as a “natural laboratory” for speciation research and serve as windows on evolutionary process (Abbott et al., 2013; Harrison, 1990; Hewitt, 1988). Moving hybrid zones have an additional edge because, by moving, introgressed genes are continuously being tested in new environmental and genetic backgrounds. To exploit this asset, it is important to improve our understanding of the spatiotemporal dynamics of hybrid zones. We here investigate a unique case of a hybrid zone that moved and then stabilized in historical times. Distinguishing between stable (tension) and dynamic (moving) hybrid zones has important implications for our understanding of the role of differential introgression and selection in shaping species boundaries.Species hybrid zones frequently show a strong ecological component. One example is the genus Bombina in which the lowland red‐bellied toad (Bombina bombina, with an Ukrainian glacial refugium) encounters the mountain dwelling yellow‐bellied toad (Bombina variegata, with a Balkan glacial refugium) all along the lowland–mountain transition of Central Europe (Szymura, 1993; Vörös, Mikulíček, Major, Recuero, & Arntzen, 2016). This hybrid zone could have formed along the species ecotone where it remained in stable position, but another explanation is that it formed elsewhere and then moved till the lowland–mountain transition was reached. Biogeographical evidence supports the latter scenario (Arntzen, 1978). This author documented the presence of “enclaves” of B. variegata surrounded by B. bombina and argued that in low dispersal organisms, such as toads, the only reasonable explanation for enclaves is species displacement. The same line of reasoning has been applied to myobatrachid frogs in western Australia (Littlejohn & Roberts, 1975) and to Triturus newts in the Iberian (Arntzen & Espregueira Themudo, 2008) and Balkan peninsulae (Wielstra & Arntzen, 2012).Another case of a moving hybrid zone is that of the newts Triturus cristatus (the northern crested newt) and Triturus marmoratus (the marbled newt). These species engage in a habitat patchwork in central France, with adult F1 hybrids making up 4% of the total adult population (Arntzen, Jehle, Bardakci, Burke, & Wallis, 2009). Evidence for movement of the hybrid zone is threefold: first, through direct observation, involving the surveying of species and hybrids over a large area in ca. 1950 and in 1979. This showed the (northward) advance of T. cristatus, the regression of T. marmoratus, and the continued presence of hybrids (Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981; Vallée, 1959) (Figure 1). Second, T. marmoratus is surrounded by T. cristatus in enclaves and other persisting occurrences in areas of species replacement (Arntzen & Wallis, 1991; Arntzen, 1996; see also Arntzen, Burke, & Jehle, 2010). Third, genetic variation thought to result from hybridization is significantly higher in T. cristatus than in T. marmoratus (Arntzen & Wallis, 1991). This observation is in line with the direction of hybrid zone movement.
Figure 1
The historical distribution of the northern crested newt, Triturus cristatus (hatched), and the marbled newt, Triturus marmoratus (shaded), over the département Mayenne (a) at the first survey at ca. 1950 (data from Vallée, 1959) and (b) the second survey in 1979 (data from Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981). Pond localities investigated are shown by black dots. The asterisk in the left panel has initially been attributed to a T. cristatus introduction, but is likely to represent a natural occurrence (see text for details). The figure is reproduced from Arntzen and Wallis (1991), with permission
The historical distribution of the northern crested newt, Triturus cristatus (hatched), and the marbled newt, Triturus marmoratus (shaded), over the département Mayenne (a) at the first survey at ca. 1950 (data from Vallée, 1959) and (b) the second survey in 1979 (data from Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981). Pond localities investigated are shown by black dots. The asterisk in the left panel has initially been attributed to a T. cristatus introduction, but is likely to represent a natural occurrence (see text for details). The figure is reproduced from Arntzen and Wallis (1991), with permissionWe set out to survey the distributions of T. cristatus, T. marmoratus, and their hybrids over the French “département” Mayenne in 2014 and 2015. That is ca. 65 years after the first survey (Vallée, 1959) and 35 years after the second survey (Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981) in the same area. The objective of this third survey is to document the present‐day distribution of the two newt species and make comparisons to the two previous analyses of the hybrid zone, in particular to see whether (1) T. cristatus continued its advance over T. marmoratus, (2) enclaves persisted or dissolved over time, or (3) equilibrium conditions between T. cristatus and T. marmoratus have been reached. A further aim is to identify ecological correlates of the position of the hybrid zone in situations of stasis and flux.
Materials and Methods
Fieldwork
Fieldwork was carried out over the département Mayenne in western France during the spring of 2014 and 2015. Ponds and other potentially suitable habitats for reproducing Triturus newts were located in the field with the help of digital 1:25,000 topographical maps of the “Institute National de l'Information Geographique et Forestière” (IGN). Freshly deposited Triturus eggs and embryos (hereafter called “eggs”) were collected from aquatic vegetation such as Plicate sweet grass (Glyceria notata) and water mint (Mentha aquatic) from the accessible corners of the pond and stored in excess 96% alcohol. Dip netting for adult newts was performed in selected ponds. Dip nets and boots were regularly cleaned with a 1% (w/v) solution of Virkon® to prevent possible cross‐contamination of chytrid fungus between field sites (Dejean, Miaud, & Schmeller, 2010; Johnson, Berger, Philips, & Speare, 2003; Schmeller, Loyau, Dejean, & Miaud, 2011). To obtain an impression of the possible decline of amphibian breeding localities over time that might be interfering with the monitoring of the position of hybrid zone, we went back to pond locations documented ca. 35 and 18 years ago (Figure 1). We revisited the following: (1) the Triturus localities from the second survey, (2) the amphibian ponds from the second survey north of the N12 and D35 roads (AZ, unpublished data), and (3) the amphibian ponds from a survey in the Pré‐en‐Pail area in 1997 (JWA, unpublished data). We do not report on a few ponds for which we were uncertain about the exact location or where access was denied.
Molecular identification
DNA extraction followed the chelating resin‐based procedure of Walsh, Metzger, and Higuchi (1991). Individual eggs were placed in 1.5‐ml tubes with 0.4 ml of a 5% chelex resin solution (Chelex® 100 sodium form, 50–100 mesh) and 5 μl proteinase K (ProtK, 20 mg/ml) and left overnight to lyse at 65°C. The dissolved tissue was heated at 95°C for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 20,000 g. Ca. 0.3 ml of the supernatant was removed for storage at −20°C. SNP genotyping was used to identify the species of each egg. This analysis is based on the fact that the two newt species have different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in their DNA. A common primer binds to the DNA of both species, while two allele‐specific primers attach to the DNA of either T. cristatus or T. marmoratus. These allele‐specific primers contain fluorescent labels to identify the different species. Primers were newly developed for the mitochondrial gene NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) as common primer 5′ GATGAAATAAGCCCGTGTGAGAT 3′ and the species‐specific primers 5′ ATTATAATTCAAACACCG 3′ for T. cristatus and 5′ ATTATAATTCAAACACCA 3′ for T. marmoratus, and for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) as common primer 5′ ATTYTAGGGGCAATTAACTTTAT 3′ and the species‐specific primers 5′ TGATGGGGGTTTTATATTAATTGATGTTGTA 3′ for T. cristatus and 5′ ATGGGGGTTTTATATTAATTGATGTTGTG 3′ for T. marmoratus. The species diagnostic nucleotides were on position 231 at the ND4 fragment (GenBank accession numbers JQ653387 and JQ653401, as in Wielstra et al., 2013) and on position 448 or 440 at the COI fragment (GenBank accession numbers KP697896, JN379828 and unpublished data JWA). The material collected in 2014 was analyzed for ND4, and the material collected in 2015 was analyzed for both COI and ND4. Because a complete match was observed between the two mtDNA markers, it was deemed unnecessary to study more than a single marker in the other material. Genotypes were called automatically by the module Kraken™ of LIMS controlling the LGC genomics SNP genotyping line, visually inspected and if necessary, manually corrected. An ambiguous signal with no call made precluded the identification of 41 eggs (3.5%).
No numerical correction on species counts
Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus are dissimilar species in many respects. Relevant for data interpretation are the parameters that could affect species counts, namely (1) the length of time the adults stay in the water when reproduction is over (long in T. cristatus and short in T. marmoratus, Bouton, 1986; JWA, unpublished data); (2) the number of immature individuals in the water (frequent in T. cristatus and absent for T. marmoratus, Vallée, 1959; JWA, unpublished data); (3) the annual female fecundity (ca. 200 eggs in T. cristatus and ca. 400 eggs in T. marmoratus, Arntzen & Hedlund, 1990); (4) the skipping of annual breeding opportunities (infrequent in T. cristatus and regular in T. marmoratus, JWA, unpublished data), and (5) the preferential transmission of the maternally inherited “cristatus” mtDNA haplotypes (Arntzen et al., 2009). Field observations were made in spring when both species are in the water for breeding, and adult phenology will not have affected our results. Observations on juveniles were excluded. To test the hypothesis that factors under (3) and (4) are in equilibrium, we determined the dry weight of 50 T. cristatus and 39 T. marmoratus eggs, collected from ponds where hybrids or the counterpart species were known to be absent. The mean dry weight of T. cristatus eggs was 1.81 ± 0.34 mg (standard deviation), and for T. marmoratus eggs, it was 1.75 ± 0.33 mg, with no significant difference between the species (t‐test, p > .10). The energetic investments per egg appear similar for both species, and we assume that the high annual fecundity of T. marmoratus females (3) is offset by the skipping of annual breeding opportunities (4). While a significant reproductive asymmetry has been reported with hybrids predominantly transmitting the cristatus mtDNA haplotype (Arntzen et al., 2009), hybrids are relatively rare and the bias is minor. In all, numerical adjustments to the species counts were deemed unnecessary.
Species distribution models
The dependent variable in the study is species composition, in which T. cristatus and mixed populations with >50% T. cristatus are contrasted with pure and otherwise mixed T. marmoratus populations. The morphologically intermediate and easily recognizable T. cristatus × T. marmoratus F1 hybrids were taken to represent both species. Statistical evaluation was carried out with a logistic regression procedure in SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., 2011) in which (1) mixed ponds were downweighted relative to pure ponds on a 0.5 to unity scale, and (2) both species had equal impact in the analyses, in line with the number of populations investigated. One population with equal numbers of both species observed was not taken into consideration. For mixed populations, we also analyzed the arcsine‐transformed proportion of T. marmoratus against the environmental variables in linear regression.Forty explanatory variables were taken from the following sources: BioClim variables from the WorldClim database (http://www.worldclim.org/bioclim); CORINE land cover by the European Environmental Agency (http://www.eea.europa.eu), in particular the classes arable land (code 12) and pasture (code 18); the soil texture variables AWC, BD, CFrag, Clay, Sand, Silt, and USDA from the Natural Resources Conservation Service database (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/site/national/ home); and AgLim1, Crusting, DR, EAWaC_top, ParMaDo1, Use (recoded as continuous, from cultivated to grassland to seminatural), UseDo, WR, and WRBLv1 from the European Soil Data Centre (http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu). We considered IGN‐based maps on the distribution of hedgerows in 2006 and water bodies in 1993 and high‐resolution maps for altitude and forestation, provided by the “Conseil départemental de la Mayenne” (I. Brugioni, pers. comm.). The complementary forestation and hedgerow maps were combined. Variables were continuous with the exception of the categorical variables ParMaDo1, USDA, UseDo, and WRBLv1. Continuous variables were deselected from the analysis if not significant or if the coefficient of variation over the département Mayenne was <0.10. A single representative was chosen from clusters of variables with r
2 > .64 in a UPGMA analysis. The explanatory variables maintained are presented in Table 1. The conditions they describe were extracted over a circular area with a radius of 250 m around the pond, for all investigated Triturus populations. This scale is a compromise between mapping accuracy, average interpond distance in the study area, and the distance that adult amphibians reside, migrate, or disperse from ponds (Semlitsch & Bodie, 2003; Smith & Green, 2005). GIS analyses were carried out with ILWIS 3.3 (ILWIS, 2005).
Table 1
Environmental variables available for selection in logistic regression analysis
Explanatory variables
Description
Unit or classes (missing data)
AgLim
Dominant limitation to agricultural use
No limitation, gravelly, stony, lithic (3%)
Altitude
Elevation
Meter above sea level
AWC
Available water capacity
In seven classes
BD
Bulk density
In ten classes
Bio06
Minimum temperature of coldest month
Degrees Celsius
CFrag
Percentage of course fragments
In eight classes
Clay
Percentage clay
In eight classes
Corine 12
Arable field land cover
Percentage
Corine 18
Pasture land cover
Percentage
Crusting
Soil crusting class
Very weak, weak, moderate, strong, very strong
DR
Depth to roc
Shallow, moderate, deep, very deep
EAWaC_Top
Topsoil easily available water capacity
Low, medium, high, very high
Forestation
Presence/absence
Percentage land cover
Hedgerows
Presence/absence
Percentage land cover
ParMaDo1
Major group code for the dominant parent material
Categorical
Sand
Percentage sand
In eight classes
Silt
Percentage silt
In eight classes
USDA
Texture class
Silty clay, silt, loam, sandy loam
Use
Regrouped land use
Grassland, seminatural, cultivated
UseDo
Dominant land use
Categorical
Water bodies
Presence/absence
Percentage land cover
WR
Annual average soil water regime
Depth and period, from wet to dry in four classes
WrBLv1
Soil reference group
Categorical (5%)
For details on variables, see the Web sites listed in the text.
Environmental variables available for selection in logistic regression analysisFor details on variables, see the Web sites listed in the text.
Results
A total of N = 183 adult Triturus newts were observed in 25 ponds. One hundred thirty‐five (74%) were T. cristatus in 20 ponds, 33 (18%) were T. marmoratus in nine ponds, and 15 (8%) were T. cristatus × T. marmoratus F1 hybrids in three ponds. A total of 1,155 eggs from 97 ponds were identified to the species. Approximately two‐third of the investigated eggs had the cristatus mtDNA haplotype, and one‐third had the marmoratus mtDNA haplotype. The number of ponds with the Triturus species composition determined was 102 with an average sample size of 13.1. Mixed populations are not significantly more or less frequent now (34%) than they were 35 years ago (28%) or 65 years ago (24%) (G‐test for independence, p > .10 in both cases). The survey results are plotted in Figure 2 as T. cristatus exclusively, 60% < T. cristatus < 100%, both species about equally frequent (i.e., in the 40%–60% range), 60% < T. marmoratus < 100%, and T. marmoratus exclusively. For ease of interpretation, the distribution results are presented in Dirichlet cells for which the spatial extrapolation does not exceed 10 km.
Figure 2
The distribution of Triturus cristatus (red dots, red shading, ventral side orange) and Triturus marmoratus (green dots, green shading, dorsal side green) in the département Mayenne in western France, presented in Dirichlet cells. The amount of species mixing is shown by light (<40%) and heavy shading (>40%) surrounding black dots. P—Pré‐en‐Pail, F—les Féages (see Figure 4). Drawn images are by Bas Blankevoort, copyright Naturalis Biodiversity Center
The distribution of Triturus cristatus (red dots, red shading, ventral side orange) and Triturus marmoratus (green dots, green shading, dorsal side green) in the département Mayenne in western France, presented in Dirichlet cells. The amount of species mixing is shown by light (<40%) and heavy shading (>40%) surrounding black dots. P—Pré‐en‐Pail, F—les Féages (see Figure 4). Drawn images are by Bas Blankevoort, copyright Naturalis Biodiversity Center
Figure 4
Example of the postwar disappearance of the “bocage” aspect from the landscape in western France. Lines are hedgerows, stippled areas are orchards, and shading is forestation. (a) 1949, (b) 1977, (c) 1992 (from Arntzen, 1998, with permission), and (d) situation in 2013 (from Geoportail at http://tab.geoportail.fr). The local situation in the southwest of the département Mayenne around farmhouse ‘les Féages’ (F) is peculiar as hedgerows initially remained (a–c), but were not maintained (d)
Environmental variables that significantly contributed to the distribution model of T. cristatus vs. T. marmoratus were Altitude, Forest_hedgerows, and Water bodies, with an overall model fit of AUC = 0.847 ± 0.040 and kappa (κ) = 0.505 (Table 2). The three components to the model are illustrated in Figure 3. An alternative model, based just upon the variables Altitude and Forest_Hedgerows (cf. Arntzen & Wallis, 1991), yielded a fit of AUC = 0.778 ± 0.047 and κ = 0.373. For mixed populations, the proportion of T. marmoratus was correlated with the same parameters (Table 2).
Table 2
Models for the distribution of Triturus cristatus‐ vs. Triturus marmoratus‐dominated populations in the département Mayenne, France
Selected variables
(A) Logistic regression model
(B) Linear regression model
Arntzen and Wallis (1991)
Present study
Altitude
−0.019
−0.017
0.117
Forest_hedgerows
−0.033
−0.025
0.248
Water bodies
2.328
NA
−11.521
Constant
2.764
3.030
−75.104
Number of populations
101
154
35
Model fit
AUC ± SD
0.847 ± 0.040
0.778 ± 0.047
NA
Kappa
0.51
0.37
NA
Pearson r
NA
NA
0.50
Explanatory variables available for selection are listed in Table 1. (A) Logistic regression analysis on a binary classification of species composition. (B) Linear regression analysis on arcsine‐transformed proportion of T. marmoratus to the total population.
NA—not available for selection or not applicable.
Figure 3
Environmental variables that significantly contribute to the model describing the distribution of Triturus cristatus vs. Triturus marmoratus in the département Mayenne in western France. Red and green colors are attributed to character states that support the presence of T. cristatus and T. marmoratus, respectively. (a) Altitude and the border of the département. The solid red color signifies the relatively flat area <113 m a.s.l. where the modeled probability of occurrence of T. cristatus is >60%; solid green signifies the more hilly area >161 m a.s.l. where the modeled probability of occurrence of T. marmoratus is >60%. (b) Forestation and Gabriel network of dense hedgerows. (c) Gabriel network of water bodies. The contributions to the logistic regression model (Table 2) are statistically significant as follows: altitude—p < .001, cover by forestation and hedgerows—p < .05, and water bodies—p < .01. For the linear regression model, the significances are altitude—p < .05, cover by forestation and hedgerows—p < .05, and water bodies—p < .10
Models for the distribution of Triturus cristatus‐ vs. Triturus marmoratus‐dominated populations in the département Mayenne, FranceExplanatory variables available for selection are listed in Table 1. (A) Logistic regression analysis on a binary classification of species composition. (B) Linear regression analysis on arcsine‐transformed proportion of T. marmoratus to the total population.NA—not available for selection or not applicable.Environmental variables that significantly contribute to the model describing the distribution of Triturus cristatus vs. Triturus marmoratus in the département Mayenne in western France. Red and green colors are attributed to character states that support the presence of T. cristatus and T. marmoratus, respectively. (a) Altitude and the border of the département. The solid red color signifies the relatively flat area <113 m a.s.l. where the modeled probability of occurrence of T. cristatus is >60%; solid green signifies the more hilly area >161 m a.s.l. where the modeled probability of occurrence of T. marmoratus is >60%. (b) Forestation and Gabriel network of dense hedgerows. (c) Gabriel network of water bodies. The contributions to the logistic regression model (Table 2) are statistically significant as follows: altitude—p < .001, cover by forestation and hedgerows—p < .05, and water bodies—p < .01. For the linear regression model, the significances are altitude—p < .05, cover by forestation and hedgerows—p < .05, and water bodies—p < .10Throughout the département Mayenne, 145 recorded Triturus ponds were revisited with a 35‐year interval. Most ponds had either lost their depth or disappeared completely (n = 103, 71%). Forty‐two ponds persisted, of which 20 with Triturus newts (14%) and 22 without Triturus newts (15%). In the section of Mayenne north of the N12 and D35 roads, 64 amphibian ponds were revisited with the same time interval, and only 11 of these ponds persisted (17%). In the Pré‐en‐Pail area, 99 amphibian ponds were revisited with an 18‐year interval. Forty‐three ponds persisted (43%). The occupancy by Triturus newts in this area was 46% in 1997 and 16% in 2015.
Discussion
The notion that hybrid zones may move over the landscape is relatively new to science (for a review see Buggs, 2007). The argument for movement is mostly inferential (Buggs, 2007; see also Carling & Zuckerberg, 2011; Charpentier et al., 2012; Gay, Crochet, Bell, & Lenormand, 2008; Krosby & Rohwer, 2009; Leafloor, Moore, & Scribner, 2013). Examples of direct observation on hybrid zone dynamics are rare, because of the time frame involved (Buggs, 2007; see also Engebretsen, Barrow, Rittmeyer, Brown, & Moriarty Lemmon, 2016; Ouanes, Bahri‐Sfar, Ben Hassine, & Bonhomme, 2011; Roy, O'Connor, & Green, 2012; Smith et al., 2013; Taylor, Curry, White, Ferretti, & Lovette, 2014). We here document by direct observation a unique case of a hybrid zone that first moved and then stabilized in historical times.Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus are hybridizing species in which the frequency of hybrids in the adult F1 class averages at 4% (Arntzen et al., 2009; Vallée, 1959). The fertility of the F1 hybrids is low, and interspecific gene flow is limited. The T. cristatus and T. marmoratus contact classifies as a traditional “mosaic hybrid zone” (sensu Harrison & Rand, 1989) on account of the following: (1) the bimodal (or “trimodal,” Gay et al., 2008) genetic profile displayed, (2) the pronounced ecological differentiation expressed by the species, and (3) the patchy distribution pattern at which they engage. Following the initial survey on Triturus newts in Mayenne shortly after the Second World War (Vallée, 1959), T. cristatus has superseded T. marmoratus over a large portion of the département (Arntzen & Wallis, 1991; Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981) (Figures 1 and 2). Hybrid zone movement and species displacement are thought to be triggered or accelerated by anthropogenic change, namely the removal of hedgerows in the postwar period that allowed the fairly aquatic T. cristatus to supersede T. marmoratus, which is a more terrestrial species with preferences for hilly and forested terrain (Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981).Triturus cristatus has a northerly European distribution, and T. marmoratus has a distribution in southern France and Iberia. In spite of this general pattern, the area T. cristatus took over is in the south of Mayenne, whereas the distribution of T. marmoratus over the northern part of Mayenne remained largely unchanged (Figures 1 and 2). The effective dispersal of T. cristatus was ca. 1 km per year (Arntzen & Wallis, 1991). Triturus marmoratus was not wiped out completely from the south of the département but persisted in local populations at low frequency, often in syntopy with T. cristatus and with ongoing hybridization and introgression. The continued syntopy of the species is not surprising given the newts' longevity, with an observed maximum of 14 years in T. cristatus and T. marmoratus and 17+ years in F1 hybrids (Francillon‐Vieillot, Arntzen, & Géraudie, 1990). A wider analysis of the distribution of Triturus species and the landscape suggests that the dispersal route taken by T. cristatus is along the Loire river (JWA, unpublished) and that T. cristatus entered Mayenne from the east. An eastern point of entrance is supported by Vallée's (1959) distribution data (Figure 1a). From here, the species dispersed westwards and northwards, both prior to 1950. The northernmost T. cristatus locality near Pré‐en‐Pail was initially interpreted as an introduction (cf. footnote to Table 2 in Vallée, 1959), but molecular genetic data indicate that the local presence is natural. The arguments underlying this claim are as follows: (1) assignment tests indicate a closer genetic relationship with other northern T. cristatus populations than with the presumed source of the introduction near the city of Laval in the center of the département, and (2) the genetic variability of the Pré‐en‐Pail T. cristatus population is such that the propagule size of an introduction must have been large, which is unlikely (Arntzen et al., 2010). The alternative scenario is the northward dispersal of T. cristatus to have reached the Pré‐en‐Pail area along the Mayenne river. The existence (or past existence) of this dispersal corridor is supported by observations to the northwest (first survey, Figure 1a) and northeast of Mayenne city (third survey, Figure 2). We assume that at the second survey, this connection remained unnoticed due to sparse sampling (Figure 1b).The present‐day distribution of species and hybrids is comparable to that of the second survey (Figure 2). Southern localities with just T. marmoratus (“marmoratus enclaves”) are rare. The local absence of T. cristatus may reflect small sample sizes and stochastic effects in small populations. The most likely places for genuine marmoratus enclaves are the large forests in the south of Mayenne. Unfortunately, access to forests was frequently denied, and forest ponds are underrepresented in our survey. Mixed T. cristatus–T. marmoratus populations are frequent, especially along the Mayenne river and in the southwest of the département. Given the arrival of T. cristatus in the east of the département and its widespread advance, it is tempting to interpret the current pattern (with more mixed populations in the southwest than in the southeast of the département) as reflecting the colonization and superseding process (Figure 2). It is puzzling though why the same pattern was not found already at the second survey (Figure 1b). It is equally tempting to attribute the northward shift of the species border to climate warming, but this counteracts the fact that it is T. marmoratus from southern France and Iberia, presumably well adapted to high temperatures, that is the receding party (cf. Taylor, Larson, & Harrison, 2015; Taylor et al., 2014) and other parameters appear to be involved. A remarkable feature is the natural occurrence of a syntopic/allotopic T. cristatus population in the northeast of the département. This occurrence was observed at all three surveys and goes to show that an isolated occurrence or enclave may actively be formed as an expansion of the range ahead of the main distribution.The study of a wide variety of environmental variables yielded no new insights into the ecological parameters that determine the mutual T. cristatus/T. marmoratus distribution in Mayenne, except for the density of water bodies that was identified as a significant contributor to the best distribution model, in addition to altitude and the density of hedgerows and forestation (cf. Arntzen & Wallis, 1991). Of the parameters that contributed to the species model, the density of hedgerows is most likely to change over time. Indeed, the typical “bocage” (dense network of mature hedgerows) landscape has largely been eradicated to allow for larger field sizes, in particular in the flat, southern part of Mayenne. For a dramatic illustration of the magnitude of the change, see Figure 4. The flat southern part of Mayenne with a high density of water bodies appears particularly suited for (the advance of) T. cristatus, the more aquatic of the two species. Its relative advantage over T. marmoratus, the more terrestrial species, was boosted by the removal of hedgerows. Other habitat features are likely to play a role, such as the preference of T. marmoratus for springs and well‐vegetated ponds (Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981), but parameters like these are difficult to model in a spatial context. In mixed ponds, the contribution of T. cristatus to the total population was negatively correlated with the density of hedgerows around the pond. Accordingly, the cutting of hedgerows may well have been the prime factor that caused the hybrid zone to move.Example of the postwar disappearance of the “bocage” aspect from the landscape in western France. Lines are hedgerows, stippled areas are orchards, and shading is forestation. (a) 1949, (b) 1977, (c) 1992 (from Arntzen, 1998, with permission), and (d) situation in 2013 (from Geoportail at http://tab.geoportail.fr). The local situation in the southwest of the département Mayenne around farmhouse ‘les Féages’ (F) is peculiar as hedgerows initially remained (a–c), but were not maintained (d)As noted, the changes we documented in the distribution of T. cristatus vs. T. marmoratus over Mayenne from the second to the third survey are relatively small. Triturus cristatus has not markedly continued its advance over T. marmoratus, and mixed populations are equally frequent now as they were 35 and 65 years ago. It is therefore fair to judge that the T. cristatus vs. T. marmoratus moving hybrid zone has come to a standstill. Prime candidates for forming a barrier to the further advance of T. cristatus are the ecological variables that help to explain the current species distribution, namely altitude (p < .001), pond density (p < .01), and hedgerow and forestation (p < .05) (Figure 3). The transition from flat to hilly terrain at 113–161 m a.s.l. that sets the species apart also separates the south of the département from the north (Figure 3a). This parameter to some extent represents the other selected parameters because the amount of shelter provided by hedgerows and other small landscape elements (favoring T. marmoratus) is higher in hilly terrain than in flat areas and more ponds (favoring T. cristatus) are found in flat than in hilly areas. To disentangle the relative contribution of altitude, forestation and pond density will require data at either a larger scale (e.g., countrywide), or at a smaller scale where species interactions are most intense. An alternative explanation for hybrid zone fixation is the pond loss that followed agricultural intensification and the change from pasture to arable land use. In Mayenne, the loss of Triturus ponds was 82% in the 1950–1979 interval (Schoorl & Zuiderwijk, 1981) and another 86% in the 1979–2015 interval. This amounts to a steady loss of 5.5% of ponds per year. This rate is substantially higher than the annual loss averaging at 0.8% in United Kingdom (Wood, Greenwood, & Agnew, 2003) and 3.5% in northwestern France (Curado, Hartel, & Arntzen, 2011). The decline will have compromised the dense network of ponds that is required for a healthy Triturus population network (Halley, Oldham, & Arntzen, 1996). Without ponds as “stepping stones,” new areas cannot be colonized.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Zdeněk Mačát; Martin Rulík; Daniel Jablonski; Antonín Reiter; Lenka Jeřábková; Stanislav Rada; Peter Mikulíček Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 2.912