Literature DB >> 28115545

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response to Varying RpoS Levels in Escherichia coli K-12.

Garrett T Wong1, Richard P Bonocora2, Alicia N Schep1, Suzannah M Beeler1, Anna J Lee Fong1, Lauren M Shull1, Lakshmi E Batachari1, Moira Dillon1, Ciaran Evans3, Carla J Becker1, Eliot C Bush1, Johanna Hardin3, Joseph T Wade4,5, Daniel M Stoebel6.   

Abstract

The alternative sigma factor RpoS is a central regulator of many stress responses in Escherichia coli The level of functional RpoS differs depending on the stress. The effect of these differing concentrations of RpoS on global transcriptional responses remains unclear. We investigated the effect of RpoS concentration on the transcriptome during stationary phase in rich media. We found that 23% of genes in the E. coli genome are regulated by RpoS, and we identified many RpoS-transcribed genes and promoters. We observed three distinct classes of response to RpoS by genes in the regulon: genes whose expression changes linearly with increasing RpoS level, genes whose expression changes dramatically with the production of only a little RpoS ("sensitive" genes), and genes whose expression changes very little with the production of a little RpoS ("insensitive"). We show that sequences outside the core promoter region determine whether an RpoS-regulated gene is sensitive or insensitive. Moreover, we show that sensitive and insensitive genes are enriched for specific functional classes and that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS corresponds to the timing of induction as cells enter stationary phase. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism to coordinate specific cellular processes with growth phase and may also contribute to the diversity of stress responses directed by RpoS.IMPORTANCE The sigma factor RpoS is a global regulator that controls the response to many stresses in Escherichia coli Different stresses result in different levels of RpoS production, but the consequences of this variation are unknown. We describe how changing the level of RpoS does not influence all RpoS-regulated genes equally. The cause of this variation is likely the action of transcription factors that bind the promoters of the genes. We show that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS levels explains the timing of expression as cells enter stationary phase and that genes with different RpoS sensitivities are enriched for specific functional groups. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism that coordinates specific cellular processes in response to stresses.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RpoS; promoters; stress response; transcriptional regulation; transcriptome; σS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28115545      PMCID: PMC5350281          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00755-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  81 in total

1.  DNA looping-mediated repression by histone-like protein H-NS: specific requirement of Esigma70 as a cofactor for looping.

Authors:  Minsang Shin; Miryoung Song; Joon Haeng Rhee; Yeongjin Hong; You-Jin Kim; Yeong-Jae Seok; Kwon-Soo Ha; Se-Hui Jung; Hyon E Choy
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The bacterial DNA-binding protein H-NS represses ribosomal RNA transcription by trapping RNA polymerase in the initiation complex.

Authors:  O Schröder; R Wagner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Role of DNA supercoiling and rpoS sigma factor in the osmotic and growth phase-dependent induction of the gene osmE of Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  A Conter; C Menchon; C Gutierrez
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Athanasios Typas; Regine Hengge
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Acid resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hope T Richard; John W Foster
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.086

6.  Repressor activity of the RpoS/σS-dependent RNA polymerase requires DNA binding.

Authors:  Corinne Lévi-Meyrueis; Véronique Monteil; Odile Sismeiro; Marie-Agnès Dillies; Annie Kolb; Marc Monot; Bruno Dupuy; Sara Serradas Duarte; Bernd Jagla; Jean-Yves Coppée; Mélanie Beraud; Françoise Norel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  IraL is an RssB anti-adaptor that stabilizes RpoS during logarithmic phase growth in Escherichia coli and Shigella.

Authors:  Andrew J Hryckowian; Aurelia Battesti; Justin J Lemke; Zachary C Meyer; Rodney A Welch
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Comprehensive mapping of the Escherichia coli flagellar regulatory network.

Authors:  Devon M Fitzgerald; Richard P Bonocora; Joseph T Wade
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Unprecedented high-resolution view of bacterial operon architecture revealed by RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Tyrrell Conway; James P Creecy; Scott M Maddox; Joe E Grissom; Trevor L Conkle; Tyler M Shadid; Jun Teramoto; Phillip San Miguel; Tomohiro Shimada; Akira Ishihama; Hirotada Mori; Barry L Wanner
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  28 in total

1.  Mutations in Escherichia coli Polyphosphate Kinase That Lead to Dramatically Increased In Vivo Polyphosphate Levels.

Authors:  Amanda K Rudat; Arya Pokhrel; Todd J Green; Michael J Gray
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Coxiella burnetii RpoS Regulates Genes Involved in Morphological Differentiation and Intracellular Growth.

Authors:  Derek E Moormeier; Kelsi M Sandoz; Paul A Beare; Daniel E Sturdevant; Vinod Nair; Diane C Cockrell; Heather E Miller; Robert A Heinzen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Active bacterial modification of the host environment through RNA polymerase II inhibition.

Authors:  Inès Ambite; Nina A Filenko; Elisabed Zaldastanishvili; Daniel Sc Butler; Thi Hien Tran; Arunima Chaudhuri; Parisa Esmaeili; Shahram Ahmadi; Sanchari Paul; Björn Wullt; Johannes Putze; Swaine L Chen; Ulrich Dobrindt; Catharina Svanborg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Experimental Evolution of Escherichia coli K-12 at High pH and with RpoS Induction.

Authors:  Issam Hamdallah; Nadia Torok; Katarina M Bischof; Nadim Majdalani; Sriya Chadalavada; Nonto Mdluli; Kaitlin E Creamer; Michelle Clark; Chase Holdener; Preston J Basting; Susan Gottesman; Joan L Slonczewski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  The impact of cell structure, metabolism and group behavior for the survival of bacteria under stress conditions.

Authors:  Xinyi Zhang; Zhendong Li; Shengmei Pang; Boyu Jiang; Yang Yang; Qiangde Duan; Guoqiang Zhu
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 6.  Trouble is coming: Signaling pathways that regulate general stress responses in bacteria.

Authors:  Susan Gottesman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Diversity, versatility and complexity of bacterial gene regulation mechanisms: opportunities and drawbacks for applications in synthetic biology.

Authors:  Indra Bervoets; Daniel Charlier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Collateral effects of deletion of nlpD on rpoS and rpoS-dependent genes. Reply.

Authors:  Inès Ambite; Ulrich Dobrindt; Catharina Svanborg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 19.456

9.  Physiological, Genetic, and Transcriptomic Analysis of Alcohol-Induced Delay of Escherichia coli Death.

Authors:  Christina M Ferraro; Steven E Finkel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Phospho-dependent signaling during the general stress response by the atypical response regulator and ClpXP adaptor RssB.

Authors:  Jacob Schwartz; Jonghyeon Son; Christiane Brugger; Alexandra M Deaconescu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.