| Literature DB >> 28114953 |
Kumiko Tanaka1,2, Taka-Aki Nakada3,4, Hiroshi Fukuma1, Shota Nakao1, Naohisa Masunaga1, Keisuke Tomita2, Yosuke Matsumura2, Yasuaki Mizushima1, Tetsuya Matsuoka1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A sudden shortage of physician resources due to overwhelming patient needs can affect the quality of care in the emergency department (ED). Developing effective response strategies remains a challenging research area. We created a novel system using information and communication technology (ICT) to respond to a sudden shortage, and tested the system to determine whether it would compensate for a shortage.Entities:
Keywords: Cloud server; Critical care; Information sharing; Life threatening; Mail; Mass casualty; Mobile phone; Night; Trauma
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28114953 PMCID: PMC5260081 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0347-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ISSN: 1757-7241 Impact factor: 2.953
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of data flow in the newly developed system. A requester in the hospital activates the system by filling in a request form. The request is securely transferred to a cloud server via Internet line. The cloud-based software automatically creates an e-mail based on the content of a request, and sends the e-mail to physicians’ personal mobile phones. Responses from physicians outside the hospital are transferred to the cloud server, where a list of current response status is created and updated at all times, and shared in real-time among physicians both inside and outside the hospital
Fig. 2Input screen for request. The requester selects 4 input items by button input including categories of request, rationales for request, and needed type and number of physicians. To enable inclusion of key information in the request, two text input fields in the section (rationale and note) were provided
Fig. 3a. Received mail text in mobile phone of physician outside hospital. b. List of current response status in mobile phone
Data on patients and the novel emergency mail system
| Patient data | |
| Admitted patients -n | 3559 |
| Timing of admission -n (%) | |
| Daytime -n, total (per hour) | 1573 (174.8) |
| Night -n, total (per hour) | 1986 (132.4) |
| Weekday -n, total (per day) | 2515 (503) |
| Weekend -n, total (per day) | 1044 (522) |
| Multiple simultaneous patients -n (%) | 997 (28.0) |
| 2 patients | 868 (24.4) |
| ≥ 3 patients | 129 (3.6) |
| System data | |
| Category of request | |
| Standby | 12 |
| Attendance | 12 |
| Timing of activation -n | |
| Daytime on a Weekday | 1 |
| Off-hours | 23 |
| Weekend | 12 |
| Night | 19 |
| During emergency surgery | 14 |
| Rationale for activation -n | |
| Mass casualty | 15 |
| Severe trauma | 4 |
| Others | 5 |
| Attendance request | |
| Pre-existing physicians -n | 5.1 ± 1.6 |
| Pre-existing patients -n | 2.5 ± 1.4 |
| Requested physicians -n | 2.2 ± 0.8 |
| Attended physicians -n | 2.0 ± 1.2 |
| Cancelled physicians -n | 2.0 ± 2.0 |
| Arrival time -min | 21 ± 9.0 |
| Fulfillment rate -% | 100 (12/12) |
Data from September 2013 to August 2015 are shown
Daytime, 8:00–17:00; Weekend, Saturday and Sunday
Fulfillment rate, (Number of cases for which the new system achieved sufficient physician attendance) / (Total number of emergency attendance requests) × 100
Data are mean and standard deviation
Fig. 4Probability of multiple casualties with a high likelihood of a life-threatening condition before and after system introduction. The probability of multiple casualties with a high likelihood of life-threatening conditions before and after system introduction was not significantly different during daytime weekday hours (before vs. after, 10.0% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.062) (a). However, during nights or weekends, the probability of multiple casualties with a high likelihood of life-threatening conditions after system introduction was significantly higher compared to before system introduction (before vs. after [nights or weekends], 4.8% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001) (b), as well as in the overall time period (before vs. after, 6.2% vs. 13.6%, P < 0.0001) (c). P value was calculated using a chi-square test