N-aryl 2-aryloxyacetamides as a new class of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors.

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is a promising target for the development of drugs to treat neurological diseases. In search of new FAAH inhibitors, we identified 2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide, 4g, with an IC50 of 2.6 µM as a chemical starting point for the development of potent FAAH inhibitors. Preliminary hit-to-lead optimisation resulted in 2-(4-phenylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide, 4i, with an IC50 of 0.35 µM.

Introduction

The endocannabinoid system is involved in a number of physiological effects including control of pain, appetite and cell proliferation1. It contains cannabinoid receptors (CBs) and their stimulating endogenous endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), which are synthesised on demand from cell membrane arachidonic acid derivatives2. AEA and 2-AG have a short lifetime due to rapid hydrolysis by the enzymes fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)3 and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL)4, respectively. AEA is the primary substrate for FAAH5; however, it has a wide substrate specificity and can hydrolyse compounds such as N-oleoylethanolamine, a lipid mediator that limits food intake and the anti-inflammatory compound N-palmitoylethanolamide6. Inhibition of FAAH produces elevated levels of AEA in the brain and periphery, as well as potentially beneficial effects in animal models of anxiety and pain7–11.

FAAH is a serine hydrolase enzyme with a unique catalytic triad consisting of two serines (Ser217 and Ser241) and one lysine (Lys142), which makes it distinct from other serine hydrolases. In contrast to other serine hydrolases, FAAH was revealed to hydrolyse amides faster than esters12. A number of FAAH inhibitors has been developed to block the catabolism of AEA13–15. A breakthrough came when inhibitors of a class of N-alkylcarbamic acid O-aryl esters (URB524 and URB597, Figure 1) were found to significantly inhibit the enzyme and to modulate AEA levels in rodents7,16. Those inhibitors blocked FAAH activity through irreversible carbamoylation of the catalytic nucleophile Ser241, where the biphenyl group served as a leaving group17. Additionally, quantum mechanics and molecular modelling simulation suggested that the process of hydrolysis by FAAH was slowed down because of the stabilised hydrogen bond formation between cyclohexylcarbamic ester and active site of the enzyme18. It is also noteworthy that compound URB597 was found to be a selective FAAH inhibitor that did not affect hydrolysis of 2-AG19. Benzoxazole-, oxazolopyridine- and benzimidazole-based compounds have previously shown to efficiently inhibit FAAH13–15. Nevertheless, the crystal structures of FAAH with covalent and non-covalent inhibitors has revealed multiple pockets near the catalytic core, which offers a wide range of binding modes that can be exploited in the design of novel inhibitors20,21. In the present study, we developed synthetic protocols and investigated a series of N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl) and N-(imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl) moieties connected by a 2-aryloxyacetamide to a aliphatic, phenylic or biphenylic hydrophobic “tail” that mimics the arachidonyl moiety of 2-AG.

Figure 1.

Known fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors.

Materials and methods

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 2a–f (Scheme 1)

To the polyphosphoric acid (1.5 g/mmol) was added 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine or 2,3-diaminopyridine (1.0 equiv) and the relevant benzoic acid (1.0 equiv). The mixture was heated to 200 °C and stirred for 6 h. The reaction was cooled slightly and poured into cold water and the mixture was neutralised to pH 8 with 5 M NaOH. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The solid residue obtained was dissolved in EtOAc and triturated with heptanes. The precipitate formed was filtered and dried under vacuum to obtain the desired compounds 2a–f. Further details are given in the Supporting information.

2-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2a)

Yield: 22%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.50 (dd, 1H, J = 4.92, 1.40 Hz), 8.18 (dd, 1H, J = 8.08, 1.40 Hz), 7.95 (dd, 1H, J = 8.10, 1.46 Hz), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.19 (bs, 2H), 6.94 (dd, 1H, J = 8.38, 0.66 Hz), 6.73–6.69 (m, 1H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 165.63, 156.00, 150.02, 146.46, 141.65, 133.85, 128.51, 120.54, 118.58, 116.93, 116.08, 106.36.

3-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2b)

Yield: 47%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.22 (dd, 1H, J = 8.14, 1.42 Hz), 7.48–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.27 (t, 1H, J = 7.90 Hz), 6.86–6.83 (m, 1H), 5.55 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 166.07, 156.10, 149.96, 146.83, 143.07, 130.33, 126.79, 120.98, 119.31, 118.52, 115.38, 112.73.

4-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2c)

Yield: 57%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.42 (d, 1H, J = 4.86 Hz), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.04 Hz), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.52 Hz), 7.33–7.30 (m, 1H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 8.58 Hz), 6.16 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 166.66, 156.90, 153.84, 146.09, 142.74, 130.03, 119.70, 118.26, 114.02, 112.24.

2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2d)

Yield: 29%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.24 (bs, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 3.32 Hz), 7.96–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.16 (m, 4H), 6.84 (dd, 1H, J = 8.28, 0.88 Hz), 6.65 (t, 1H, J = 7.46 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 154.72, 149.20, 143.79, 131.43, 128.19, 118.15, 116.87, 115.62, 110.22.

3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2e)

Yield: 80%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.33 (bs, 1H), 8.31 (bs, 1H), 7.97 (bs, 1H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.33 (d, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 7.23–7.17 (m, 2H), 6.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.20 Hz), 5.33 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 153.37, 149.18, 143.57, 135.60, 130.21, 129.48, 125.99, 119.04, 117.93, 116.25, 114.32, 112.08.

4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2f)

Yield: 90%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ12.92 (bs, 1H), 8.21 (bs, 1H), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.00 Hz), 7.84 (bs, 1H), 7.13 (bs, 1H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 7.92 Hz), 5.58 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 153.86, 151.33, 149.63, 143.06, 142.26, 135.97, 128.25, 124.82, 118.01, 117.60, 117.04, 116.50, 113.58.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 3b–e (Scheme 1)

To a stirred solution of an alcohol derivative (1.0 equiv) in dry DMF (2 mL/mmol) was added NaH (2.0 equiv) and allowed to stir for 1 h at room temperature. To this mixture, sodium iodoacetate (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and washed out with EtOAc. The aqueous layer was acidified with 1 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum to obtain the desired compounds 3b–e.

2-(4-Isopropylphenoxy)acetic acid (3b)

Yield: 65%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C11H14O3 [M-H]+, 193.09; found 193.26; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.52 Hz), 6.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.76 Hz), 4.61 (s, 2H), 2.87–2.77 (m, 1H), 1.16 (d, 6H, J = 6.92 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.82, 156.30, 141.35, 127.57, 114.65, 64.96, 33.05, 24.55.

2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetic acid (3c)

Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C14H12O3 [M-H]+, 227.07; found 227.20; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.03 (bs, 1H), 7.62–7.58 (m, 4H),7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.31 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.00 (d, 2H, J = 8.84 Hz), 4.72 (s, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.67, 157.87, 140.22, 133.53, 129.33, 128.21, 127.26, 126.70, 115.36, 64.99.

2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)acetic acid (3d)

Yield: 63%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C14H18O3 [M-H]+, 233.12; found 233.24; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ12.95 (bs, 1H), 7.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 6.80 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.61 (s, 2H), 2.43–2.42 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.18 (m, 5H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.82, 156.32, 140.63, 127.92, 114.63, 64.95, 43.37, 34.68, 26.87, 26.07.

(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetic acid (3e)

Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C8H14O3 [M-H]+, 157.09; found 157.19; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.58–5.50 (m, 1H), 4.09 (s, 2H), 4.06 (dd, 2H, J = 6.50, 0.70 Hz), 2.04 (q, 2H, J = 7.22 Hz), 1.41 (sext, 2H, J = 7.41 Hz), 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 172.10, 134.36, 126.70, 71.23, 66.71, 34.18, 22.18, 13.94.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4a–c

The acid derivative (1.0 equiv) was suspended in dry DCM and was added oxalyl chloride (1.5 equiv) and a catalytic amount of DMF. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol) and added dropwise to a priorly stirred solution of amine derivative (0.8 equiv) and NaH (1.5 equiv) for 30 min in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol). The reaction mixture was continued stirring for overnight at room temperature, diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4a–c in respective yields.

2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4a)

Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 422.22; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 12.50 (bs, 1H), 8.89 (dd, 1H, J = 8.54, 0.78 Hz), 8.74 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.34–8.29 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.62 (m, 7H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.30 (m, 4H), 4.89 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.19, 163.84, 157.18, 154.97, 147.53, 142.08, 140.14, 138.67, 134.31, 134.03, 129.35, 129.17, 128.22, 127.34, 126.76, 124.35, 121.87, 120.54, 119.77, 116.12, 113.15, 67.58.

2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4b)

Yield: 42%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 428.26; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 12.44 (bs, 1H), 8.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 8.69 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.34–8.28 (m, 2H), 7.72 (t, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.58–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 4.79 (s, 2H), 2.46 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.68 (m, 5H), 1.40–1.18 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.39, 163.80, 155.69, 154.97, 147.49, 142.06, 141.20, 138.67, 134.26, 129.16, 127.98, 124.30, 121.84, 120.54, 119.73, 115.39, 113.14, 67.52, 43.41, 34.68, 26.87, 26.07.

(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4c)

Yield: 34%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.30; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 12.21 (bs, 1H), 8.82 (dd, 1H, J = 8.50, 0.86 Hz), 8.61 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.32–8.26 (m, 2H), 7.69 (t, 1H, J = 7.90 Hz), 7.56–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.36 (t, 1H, J = 7.66 Hz), 5.96–5.89 (m, 1H), 5.81–5.74 (m, 1H), 4.22 (dd, 2H, J = 6.22, 0.86 Hz), 4.14 (s, 2H), 2.00 (q, 2H, J = 7.06 Hz), 1.34 (sext, 2H, J = 7.34 Hz), 0.83 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.18, 163.77, 154.93, 147.26, 142.03, 138.74, 135.19, 134.18, 129.12, 126.64, 124.13, 121.79, 120.50, 119.64, 113.08, 72.52, 69.46, 34.12, 22.06, 13.98.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4d–k

The acid derivative (1.5 equiv), N,N′-diisopropyl ethyl amine (6.0 equiv) and TBTU (1.5 equiv) were dissolved in dry DMF (10 mL/mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. At this point, the amine derivative (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring at 70 °C for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4d–k in respective yields.

N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-phenoxyacetamide (4d)

Yield: 43%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H15N3O3 [M + H]+, 346.12; found 346.14; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.45 (bs, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.83, 1.41 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.38 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 7.86 Hz), 7.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.16, 2.10, 0.90 Hz), 7.62 (t, 1H, J = 7.95 Hz), 7.49–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 7.86 Hz), 6.99 (t, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 4.77 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.65, 165.11, 158.25, 155.91, 147.11, 143.28, 139.80, 130.47, 130.02, 126.85, 124.07, 123.34, 121.72, 121.36, 119.62, 118.93, 115.17, 67.53.

2-(4-Isopropylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4e)

Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C23H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 388.17; found 388.23; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.42 (bs, 1H), 8.71 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.40 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.92–7.89 (m, 1H), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 7.98 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 6.95 (dd, 2H, J = 6.68, 2.04 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.88–2.81 (m, 1H), 1.18 (d, 6H, J = 6.92 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.82, 165.12, 156.37, 155.92, 147.11, 143.28, 141.66, 139.81, 130.46, 127.67, 126.85, 124.06, 123.32, 121.36, 119.61, 118.93, 114.98, 67.69, 33.08, 24.57.

2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4f)

Yield: 63%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 422.09; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.50 (bs, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.26 (dd, 1H, J = 8.18, 1.41 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 7.80 Hz), 7.91–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.60 (m, 5H), 7.50–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.31 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.84 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.61, 165.11, 157.92, 155.92, 147.11, 143.28, 140.18, 139.81, 133.77, 130.49, 129.34, 128.28, 127.30, 126.87, 126.72, 124.05, 123.35, 121.36, 119.62, 118.92, 115.64, 67.63.

2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4 g)

Yield: 57%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 428.14; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.42 (bs, 1H), 8.71 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.40 Hz), 7.98 (dd, 1H, J = 6.72, 1.48 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 8.20, 1.16 Hz), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 8.00 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.68 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.38–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.84, 165.11, 156.39, 155.92, 147.11, 143.27, 140.94, 139.81, 130.46, 128.02, 126.84, 124.05, 123.31, 121.36, 119.61, 118.92, 114.96, 67.67, 43.39, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.

(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4 h)

Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.11; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.09 (bs, 1H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 8.56 (d, 1H, J = 4.74 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 8.10 Hz), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 8.19, 0.93 Hz), 7.59 (t, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 5.77–5.73 (m, 1H), 5.63–5.58 (m, 1H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 4.06 (d, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 7.06 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.34 Hz), 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.32, 165.18, 155.91, 147.09, 143.26, 139.84, 135.04, 130.34, 126.74, 126.56, 124.16, 123.19, 121.35, 119.60, 119.00, 71.82, 69.37, 34.22, 22.16, 13.99.

2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4i)

Yield: 42%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 421.91; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 10.57 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (d, 1H, J = 4.64 Hz), 8.23 (t, 3H, J = 8.16 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8.40 Hz), 7.63 (t, 4H, J = 7.10 Hz), 7.43 (t, 3H, J = 6.68 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.28 Hz), 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 8.48 Hz), 4.84 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.75, 165.17, 157.89, 156.17, 146.89, 143.16, 142.90, 140.16, 133.79, 129.35, 129.25, 128.29, 127.32, 126.72, 121.17, 120.98, 120.25, 119.31, 115.62, 67.65.

2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4j)

Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 427.95; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 10.50 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.18 Hz), 8.24–8.21 (m, 3H), 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.80 Hz), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 6.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.97, 165.16, 156.37, 156.17, 146.88, 143.15, 142.91, 140.97, 129.22, 128.03, 121.13, 120.97, 120.23, 119.29, 114.93, 67.70, 43.38, 34.67, 26.85, 26.06.

(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4k)

Yield: 54%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.05; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 10.17 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.24 Hz), 8.21 (dd, 3H, J = 9.18, 1.94 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8.80 Hz), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.62–5.55 (m, 1H), 4.08 (s, 2H), 4.05 (d, 2H, J = 6.24 Hz), 2.01 (q, 2H, J = 6.96 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.35 Hz), 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.47, 165.22, 156.19, 146.86, 143.14, 143.00, 135.06, 129.13, 126.54, 120.96, 120.94, 120.26, 119.28, 71.80, 69.40, 34.21, 22.15, 14.00.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4 l–n (Scheme 1)

The acid derivative (1.0 equiv) was suspended in dry DCM and was added oxalyl chloride (1.5 equiv) and a catalytic amount of DMF. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol) and added dropwise to a priorly stirred solution of amine derivative (0.8 equiv) and triethylamine (2.5 equiv) for 30 min in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol). The reaction mixture was continued stirring for overnight at room temperature, diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4 l–n in respective yields.

N-(2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide (4 l)

Yield: 46%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 421.09; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.47 (bs, 2H, imidazole-NH, acetamide-NH), 8.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.16 Hz), 8.45 (bs, 1H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 7.99 (dd, 1H, J = 8.00, 1.32 Hz), 7.66–7.53 (m, 6H), 7.43 (t, 3H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.31 (t, 3H, J = 7.32 Hz), 4.86 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ168.16, 157.56, 152.97, 144.93, 140.12, 138.13, 133.99, 131.67, 129.34, 128.51, 128.27, 127.33, 126.73, 124.00, 120.81, 119.00, 116.58, 116.06, 68.14.

N-(2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide (4m)

Yield: 21%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.43 (bs, 2H, imidazole-NH, acetamide-NH), 8.82 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 8.42 (bs, 1H), 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 6.92 Hz), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.16 Hz), 7.53 (t, 1H, J = 7.55 Hz), 7.32–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 4.75 (s, 2H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.37–1.21 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.97, 155.69, 152.92, 144.31, 140.76, 137.67, 131.10, 128.10, 127.60, 123.52, 120.35, 118.36, 116.39, 114.93, 67.77, 42.95, 34.22, 26.42, 25.62.

(E)-N-(2–(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide (4n)

Yield: 45%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 13.61 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 13.25 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.80 (dd, 1H, J = 8.28, 0.96 Hz), 8.40 (dd, 1H, J = 4.66, 1.18 Hz), 8.18(d, 1H, J = 7.34 Hz), 8.01 (dd, 1H, J = 7.92, 1.12 Hz),7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.89 Hz), 7.31–7.26 (m, 2H), 5.74 (m, 2H), 4.19 (d, 2H, J = 3.36 Hz), 4.10 (s, 2H), 2.00–1.95 (m, 2H), 1.31 (sext, 2H, J = 7.33 Hz), 0.82 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.93, 152.83, 144.86, 138.29, 135.07, 131.59, 128.51, 126.67, 123.71, 120.65, 118.85, 116.38, 72.27, 69.73, 34.16, 22.07, 13.96.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4o–t

The acid derivative (1.5 equiv), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (6.0 equiv) and TBTU (1.5 equiv) were dissolved in dry DMF (10 mL/mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. At this point, amine derivative (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring at 70 °C for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4o–t in respective yields.

N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide (4o)

Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 420.96; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.58–13.20 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.35 (bs, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 8.33 (bs, 1H), 8.05 (bs, 1H), 7.92(d, 1H, J = 7.40 Hz), 7.79(d, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.66–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.74 Hz), 7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.70 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.32, 157.95, 156.77, 153.55, 152.72, 149.83, 144.56, 144.29, 140.19, 139.43, 136.02, 133.74, 130.71, 129.91, 129.35, 128.28, 127.72, 126.72, 122.42, 122.36, 122.28, 119.77, 118.79, 118.64, 115.64, 67.64.

N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide (4p)

Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.00; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.48 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.28 (bs, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.34 (bs, 1H), 8.02 (bs, 1H), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.20 Hz), 7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.96 Hz), 7.26–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.44 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.24 Hz), 4.71 (s, 2H), 2.38 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.38–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.55, 156.42, 153.54, 152.70, 149.81, 144.60, 144.27, 140.92, 139.42, 136.02, 130.68, 129.88, 128.01, 126.77, 122.38, 119.80, 118.78, 118.63, 114.95, 67.67, 43.39, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.

(E)-N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide (4q)

Yield: 66%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.54–13.17 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 9.93 (bs, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.33 (bs, 1H), 8.05 (bs, 1H), 7.89 (d, 1H, J = 7.64 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 7.56 Hz), 7.51 (t, 1H, J = 7.64 Hz), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H, J = 7.70 Hz), 5.79–5.72 (m, 1H), 5.64–5.57 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.05 (m, 4H), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 6.97 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.35 Hz), 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.99, 156.78, 153.62, 152.80, 149.82, 144.53, 144.26, 139.45, 136.02, 134.97, 130.61, 129.83, 129.77, 127.70, 126.60, 122.37, 122.27, 119.75, 118.85, 118.62, 71.79, 69.39, 34.22, 22.17, 14.01.

N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide(4r)

Yield: 58%; ESIMS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 421.02; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.31 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.40 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 4.48 Hz), 8.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.96 (bs, 1H), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.64 (t, 4H, J = 7.38 Hz), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz),7.23–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.76 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.44, 157.92, 144.24, 140.90, 140.17, 133.77, 129.35, 128.29, 127.94, 127.31, 126.72, 125.28, 120.13, 118.51, 115.63, 67.67.

N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide(4s)

Yield: 49%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.33 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.33 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 4.12 Hz), 8.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 7.44 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 8.68 Hz), 7.24–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 6.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.60 Hz), 4.71 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.67, 156.39, 152.72, 149.91, 144.29, 143.90, 140.95, 136.09, 128.02, 126.41, 125.22, 120.12, 119.51, 118.49, 114.94, 67.72, 43.38, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.

(E)-N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide(4t)

Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 13.34 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 9.98 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 3.92 Hz), 8.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.98 (bs, 1H), 7.85(d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.23–7.20 (m, 1H), 5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.63–5.56 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.04 (m, 4H), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 7.01 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.32 Hz), 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.14, 156.98, 153.57, 152.74, 149.88, 144.30, 143.87, 140.96, 136.15, 135.03, 127.88, 127.78, 126.56, 126.39, 125.07, 120.14, 119.39, 118.49, 118.22, 71.79, 69.42, 34.22, 22.16, 14.00.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine (4a–k) and 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine derivatives (4 l–t) with 2-alkoxy and 2-aryloxyacetamidesubstituents in ortho, meta and para position (Table 1) were synthesised using the short and efficient route shown in Scheme 1. Previous methods for the preparation of oxazolopyridine derivatives were limited to one positional isomer and only demonstrated to work for phenols22. Moreover, synthetic pathways for compounds based on the imidazopyridine scaffold required protection of the imidazole NH group to avoid diacylation during the anilide bond formation23. Our synthetic pathway efficiently gives access to aryloxy- and alkyloxy acetamides in all positional isomers without the need for the protection of the imidazole NH group.

Table 1.

FAAH inhibitory profile of synthesised compounds.

ID	Structure	IC50 (μM)a	Maximum inhibition (%)b	ID	Structure	IC50 (μM)a	Maximum inhibition (%)b
4a		NAc	3 ± 5	4k		NA	46 ± 9
4b		NA	−1 ± 3	4l		1.1	70 ± 2
4c		NA	7 ± 3	4m		0.65	82 ± 3
4d		18	100	4n		5.5	100
4e		2.1	100	4o		13	71 ± 9
4f		0.63	100	4p		47	100
4g		2.6	100	4q		73	100
4h		17	100	4r		0.62	80 ± 2
4i		0.35	75 ± 4	4s		1.5	62 ± 4
4j		NA	19 ± 10	4t		64	100

Based on data pooled from three independent experiments using 5–7 compound concentrations.

Maximal attainable inhibition according to the preferred curve fit given as mean ± standard error.

NA: not active.

Scheme 1.

Reagents and conditions: (i) PPA, 200 °C, 6 h; (ii) (COCl)2, NaH/Et3N, DMF, rt, overnight (for 4a–c and 4 l–n); (iii) TBTU, DIPEA, DMF, 70 °C, overnight (for 4d–k and 4o–t).

The intermediates 2a–c and 2d–f were obtained by condensation of respective aminopyridines 1a and 1b with corresponding amino benzoic acid derivatives in the presence of polyphosphoric acid (PPA)22,24. The acid building blocks 3b–e were synthesised from the modified procedure by reacting aryl- or aliphatic alcohols with sodium iodoacetate in the presence of NaH in moderate yields25. The final meta and para compounds 4d–k and 4o–t were obtained in moderate yields from corresponding amines 2b, 2c, 2e and 2f and acid derivatives 3a–e by using N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)uroniumtetrafluoroborate (TBTU) as coupling agent and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) as base. The ortho-oxazolopyridineanilides 4a–c were synthesised by reacting the respective acid chloride with compound 2a in presence of NaH as a base and the ortho-imidazopyridineanilides 4 l–n by reacting the respective acid chloride with 2d using triethylamine as a base.

Inhibition of FAAH

All synthesised compounds 4a–t were evaluated for their in vitro FAAH inhibitory profile using rat brain homogenates as enzyme source and 0.5 µM [3H] AEA as substrate26,27. The data are summarised in Table 1, and examples of the inhibition curves obtained for compounds of different potency are shown in Figure 2. A structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis revealed that the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-ortho-anilides a–c were void of activity while in the set of oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-meta-anilides 4d–h all compounds inhibited FAAH. Compound 4f with a biphenyl ether was the most potent and completely blocked AEA hydrolysis with an IC50 of 0.63 µM. Among the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-para-anilides 4i–k, the results were less clear. In this set, we identified the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-para-anilide with a biphenyl ether group 4i as the most potent compound with an IC50 of 0.35 µM. However, this compound did not reach 100% inhibition even at high concentrations. The other compounds all proved to be less effective as FAAH inhibitors. To further investigate the importance of the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine core, the ortho, meta and para isomers 4 l–t with hex-2-en-1-yl, biphenyl and 4-cyclohexylphenyl groups on the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine anilide were synthesised an evaluated. In this set, the most potent compound proved to be the biphenyl para-substituted compound 4r with an IC50 value of 0.62 µM and maximum inhibition of 80%, thus equipotent with the oxazolo derivative 4i. The ortho-oxazolo derivatives 4a–c were all inactive in contrast to the imidazo isosteres 4 l–n with IC50 values ranging from 0.65 to 5.5 µM. The meta-substituted imidazo compounds 4o–q were all less potent than their corresponding oxazoloisosteres 4f–h. For the para-substituted compounds, no clear trends were observed and potent as well as poor inhibitors were found among both oxazolo and imidazo compounds, for example, 4i and 4r compared to, for example, 4k and 4t. The data show that the oxazolo and imidazo compounds display slightly different SARs based on the positioning of these groups and the amide on the central aromatic ring. Based on the low IC50 and maximum inhibition, the oxazolo scaffold, for example, 4f is superior when carrying large cyclic substituents in meta position.

Figure 2.

Inhibition of 0.5 μM [3H]AEA hydrolysis in rat brain hydrolysis by 4a, 4 h and 4i. Shown are means ± sem. (when not enclosed by the symbols, n = 3). The curves are those of best fit using the log[inhibitor] versus response, variable slope algorithm available in the GraphPad Prism software (v6.0 h for the Macintosh). The curves were constrained to a maximum value of 100% and the minimum value was either set at 0% or allowed to float. The preferred model was then selected by the software using Akaike’s informative criteria.

The data summarised in Table 1 was according to an assay where the compounds were not pre-incubated with the enzyme prior to the addition of substrate, in order to give an estimate of the initial affinity between inhibitor and FAAH. However, for most of the compounds, concentration–response curves were also obtained using a 60-min pre-incubation period, in order to determine whether or not the observed inhibition was time-dependent. A small degree of time-dependent inhibition was seen with 4t (IC50 values of 43 vs. 64 µM for 60 vs. 0 min of pre-incubation). For compound 4i, the IC50 valued were essentially the same (0.28 vs. 0.35 µM for 60 vs. 0 min of pre-incubation), but the maximum observed inhibition was lower for the pre-incubated samples (39 ± 2% vs. 75 ± 4%, respectively). A reduced maximal inhibition was also seen with 4 l, 4m and 4r, whereas essentially identical inhibition curves were seen with 4n–q and 4s.

Compounds 4a–c were not active, even after pre-incubation. These data support the conclusion that the compounds are reversible FAAH inhibitors. Under our assay conditions with a 60-min pre-incubation, the irreversible inhibitor URB597 gave an IC50 value of around 2 nM28–30, which is in line with previously reported data of 4.6 ± 1.6 nM7.

We determined the thermodynamic aqueous solubility in phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM, pH 7.48) at 37 °C of a subset of compounds essentially as described previously31. It is clear that all the tested compounds (4f, 4i, 4m, 4r and 4s) are poorly soluble under these conditions with solubility ranging from 3 to 20 µM. Comparison of 4i and 4r indicates that there is no difference in solubility, 18 and 20 µM, respectively, between oxazolo and imidazo compounds. Compounds with the cyclohexylphenoxy substitutent were generally less soluble than compounds with the biphenyl substituent, as seen for 4s (3 µM) and 4r (20 µM).

Molecular modelling

To evaluate potential binding poses of the compounds to FAAH, 4a–t were docked to a crystal structure of FAAH (PDB code: 3QJ9)32 using a docking protocol validated on the crystal ligand’s docking performance (Figure 3(a)). Further details on method and results are given in the Supporting information. The crystal ligand 1-{(3S)-1-[4–(1-benzofuran-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl]piperidin-3-yl}-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one bound to FAAH with the benzofurane in the ligand binding site entrance interacting with Trp531 through a T-shaped aromatic interaction, and the benzimidazole-2-one deep inside the protein closer to the catalytic triad (Figure 3(a)). The pyrimidine bound to the protein via a water-mediated hydrogen bond, but no other classical hydrogen bonds were present, indicating a protein–ligand interaction mainly dominated by hydrophobic forces. Analysis of the docking binding poses revealed that molecules with the amide in para-position to the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine moiety (4i–k) or to the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (4r–t) bound with the aromatic parts at the same binding site as those of the ligand present in the crystal structure (Figure 3(b)). Molecules with the amide in ortho-position (4a–c and 4 l–m), the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine or 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine rings bound in the same place as the crystal ligand benzofurane, while the other aromatic parts did not overlay (Figure 3(c)). Thus, the ortho molecules did not display the same binding mode as the crystal ligand and the hex-2-en-1-yl, biphenyl and 4-cyclohexylphenyl groups (Figure 3(c)) extending towards the catalytic triad (Figure 3(a)). The meta molecules displayed a mix of binding modes varying between those similar to the crystal ligand and those similar to the ortho molecules. Notably, the potent meta-molecule 4i bound with all aromatic parts overlaying with the crystal ligand’s ditto, very similar to compound 4r (Figure 3(b)) indicating a plausible binding conformation. The docking scores (Glidescore)33 and the binding free energies (MM-GBSA)34 of the docked compounds were compared to the measured IC50 values. The crystal ligand was the strongest binder according to MM-GBSA (ΔGbind = −95 kcal/mol) and the reported IC50 for that compound was 0.1 µM32 compared to our strongest inhibitors (ΔGbind of −47 to −71 kcal/mol) with IC50 of 0.35–0.65 µM. Nevertheless, the binding free energies could not be used as a reliable indicator of binding strength between the molecules and FAAH. For instance, the difference seen between ortho-molecules carrying the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine ring, which were inactive, and the ones carrying the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, which included strong to weak inhibitors, could not be differentiated based on the binding free energy. Moreover, the potent inhibitor 4f was deemed weak according to ΔGbind (−47 kcal/mol), while the equipotent inhibitors 4i and 4r had a ΔGbind of −71 and −67 kcal/mole, respectively. Thus, the binding event of these inhibitors to FAAH is intricate, possibly including water-mediated interactions that has not been accounted in the energy calculations. The binding poses of the molecules, and especially for some of the meta and para molecules, are similar to the one seen in the crystal structure, although the affinity for FAAH cannot be completely and accurately described with MM-GBSA calculations.

Figure 3.

The FAAH protein with (a) the inhibitor from crystal structure with PDB code 3QJ9 in stick, the catalytic triad marked with a circle, and water molecules removed prior to docking indicated with name; (b) the highest ranked docking pose of 4r in stick and crystal pose in wire; (c) the highest ranked docking pose of 4m in stick and crystal pose in wire.

Conclusions

In conclusion, for the first time, N-aryl 2-aryloxyacetamides were identified as FAAH inhibitors. These chemical scaffolds may serve to be useful as templates for the design of novel inhibitors of this physiologically important enzyme.

Supporting information

Information on the docking method, results and references, general chemistry and 1H and 13C spectra of final compounds 4a–t.