Literature DB >> 28114688

Lumen-apposing covered self-expandable metal stents for short benign gastrointestinal strictures: a multicenter study.

Dennis Yang1, Jose M Nieto2, Ali Siddiqui3, Brian P Riff4, Christopher J DiMaio4, Satish Nagula4, Amr M Ismail5, Saowanee Ngamreungphong5, Mouen A Khashab5, Mihir S Wagh6, Demetrios Tzimas7, Jonathan M Buscaglia7, Daniel S Strand8, Andrew Y Wang8, Shailendra S Chauhan9, Christopher E Forsmark1, Peter V Draganov1.   

Abstract

Background and study aim Use of the fully covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for benign luminal gastrointestinal (GI) stricture (BLGS) has been limited by the migration rate. The role of the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) for BLGS is not well defined. We assessed the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LAMS for the treatment of BLGS. Patients and methods This was an observational, open-label, retrospective, single-arm, multicenter consecutive case series of patients undergoing LAMS placement for BLGS. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the LAMS. Short- and long-term clinical success rates were defined as symptom improvement/resolution with indwelling stent and after stent removal, respectively. All adverse events and additional interventions were recorded. Results A total of 30 patients (mean age 51.6 years; 63.3 % women) underwent LAMS placement for GI strictures (83.9 % anastomotic). Median stricture diameter and length were 4.5 mm (range 2 - 10 mm) and 8 mm (range 5 - 10 mm), respectively. Technical success was achieved in 29 patients (96.7 %), with an adverse event rate of 13.3 %. The stent migration rate was 8.0 % (2/25) on follow-up endoscopy. Short-term clinical success was achieved in 90.0 % (27/30) at a median of 60 days (interquartile range [IQR] 40 - 90 days). Most patients (19/23; 82.6 %) experienced sustained symptom improvement/resolution without the need for additional interventions at a median follow-up of 100 days (IQR 60 - 139 days) after LAMS removal. Conclusion This multicenter study demonstrated that LAMS placement represents a safe, feasible, and effective therapeutic option for patients with BLGS and is associated with a low stent migration rate. Our initial findings suggest that future prospective comparative studies are needed on the use of LAMS, endoscopic dilation, and conventional SEMS. . © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114688     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

1.  EUS-guided colo-enterostomy as a salvage drainage procedure in a high surgical risk patient with small bowel obstruction due to severe ileocolonic anastomotic stricture: a new application of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS).

Authors:  Hugh D Mai; Ethan Dubin; Arun A Mavanur; Marvin Feldman; Sudhir Dutta
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-05

Review 2.  Lumen Apposition: A Changing Landscape in Therapeutic Endoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A Wolf in LAMS Clothing: The Expansion of Off-Label Indications for Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.

Authors:  Chalapathi Rao Achanta; Sudhanva V Kinhal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Secured Lumen-Apposing Fully Covered Metallic Stents for Stenoses in Post-Bariatric Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Cem Simsek; Yervant Ichkhanian; Lea Fayad; Kimberly E Steele; Michael A Schweitzer; Katherine Lamond; Kia Vosoughi; Jay Doshi; Tazkia Shah; Andreas Oberbach; Abdulhameed Al-Sabban; Alex Gandsas; Anthony N Kalloo; Mouen A Khashab; Vivek Kumbhari
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents (Lams) in the Management of Refractory Gi Stenosis: A Series of 3 Cases.

Authors:  Marta Moreira; Inês Pita; João Fernandes; Richard Azevedo; Jorge Canena; Luís Lopes
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  Lumen-apposing metal stents for benign gastrointestinal tract strictures: An international multicenter experience.

Authors:  Javier Santos-Fernandez; Christopher Paiji; Mohammad Shakhatreh; Irene Becerro-Gonzalez; Ramon Sanchez-Ocana; Paul Yeaton; Jason Samarasena; Manuel Perez-Miranda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-12-16

Review 7.  Alternative uses of lumen apposing metal stents.

Authors:  Prabin Sharma; Thomas R McCarty; Ankit Chhoda; Antonio Costantino; Caroline Loeser; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Marvin Ryou; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Current uses and outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stents.

Authors:  Alessandro Mussetto; Alessandro Fugazza; Lorenzo Fuccio; Omero Triossi; Alessandro Repici; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-26

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stent for benign gastrointestinal stricture.

Authors:  Deepanshu Jain; Upen Patel; Sara Ali; Abhinav Sharma; Manan Shah; Shashideep Singhal
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-07

10.  Economical effect of lumen apposing metal stents for treating benign foregut strictures.

Authors:  Alexander Hallac; Wichit Srikureja; Eashen Liu; Parag Dhumal; Ashish Thatte; Nishant Puri
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.